This study attempts to optimize the operations of the Recycling Fund Management Board (RFMB), founded by the Environmental Protection Administration of the ROC Government (in Taiwan), by using a subsidy rate decision for domestic printer recyclers. The hierarchical and interactive relation between the two parties is modeled by bi-level programming, where the RFMB serves as the upper-level decision unit, recyclers are the lower-level counterpart, and the consumer’s action is embedded in the constraints of the lower level problem. The problem is solved by the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker transformation approach. Practical data including sales of printers per year, a survey of recycling intention, recycler cost structure, and resource recycling value are used to solve the problem. The resulting solution discovers the inefficiency of the current operations of RFMB, and suggests an appropriate recycling fee and subsidy rate that balance the interests of printer manufacturers, recyclers, and the RFMB.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors are grateful to Dr. Lih-Chyi Wen at Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taiwan, and Mr. Chipwu Cheng at the Recycling Fund Management Board, Environmental Protection Administration, ROC (Taiwan), for their valuable help.
Aiyoshi E, Shimizu K (1984) A solution method for the static constrained stackelberg problem via penalty method. IEEE Trans Autom Control 29:1111–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allende GB, Still G (2013) Solving bilevel programs with the KKT-approach. Math Program 138:309–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amendola A, Wilkinson DR (2000) Risk assessment and environmental policy making. J Hazard Mater 78:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anandalingam G (1988) A mathematical programming model of decentralized multi-level systems. J Oper Res Soc 39:1021–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenmiller B (2009) Cash recycling, waste disposal costs, and the incomes of the working poor: evidence from California. Land Econ 85:539–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard JF (1984) Optimality conditions for the bilevel programming problem. Naval Res Logist Q 31:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard JF, Falk JE (1982) An explicit solution to the multi-level programming problem. Comput Oper Res 9:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan K-S, Lin C-H, Chang T-C (2005) Management and performance of Taiwan’s waste recycling fund. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 55:574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtinger G (1999) Dynamic economic models of optimal law enforcement. In: Leopold-Wildburger U et al (eds) Modelling and decisions in economics. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtinger G (2001) Environmental policy design and the economics of crime: some analogies in intertemporal optimization. In: Kischka P et al (eds) Models, methods and decision support for management. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliege J, Vicente LN (2006) Multicriteria approach to bilevel optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 131:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortuny-Amat J, McCarl B (1981) A representation and economic interpretation of a two-level programming problem. J Oper Res Soc 32:783–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goicoechea A, Hanson DR, Duckstein L (1982) Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Kinnaman TC, Fullerton D (2000) Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. J Urban Econ 48:419–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh A (2007) Solving transportation bi-level programs with differential evolution. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 2243–2250Google Scholar
Wen L-C (2008) Analysis and planning of the waste electronic and information products recycling system. In: Environmental protection administration, Taiwan. Unpublished report (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Yang Y (2012) Environmental policy for chemical pollution in Taiwan: the An-Shun plant case. In: Deflem M (ed) ) Disasters, hazards and law. Emerald Group Publishing, UKGoogle Scholar
Yang H-L, Innes R (2007) Economic incentives and residential waste management in Taiwan: an empirical investigation. Environ Resour Econ 37:489–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeleny M (1973) Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 262–301Google Scholar