Skip to main content
Log in

Price-setting based combinatorial auction approach for carrier collaboration with pickup and delivery requests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A carrier collaboration problem with pickup and delivery requests is considered, in which multiple carriers form an alliance to share their pickup and delivery requests and vehicle capacities in order to reduce their transportation costs and consequently increase their profits. A multi-round pricing-setting based combinatorial auction approach is proposed to solve the problem. In each round of the auction, the auctioneer updates the price for serving each request based on Lagrangian relaxation, and each carrier, who is a bidder, determines its requests to be outsourced and the requests to be acquired from other carriers by solving a request selection problem based on the prices. Different price adjustment methods are proposed and compared. Numerical experiments on randomly generated instances demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann H, Ewe H, Kopfer H, Kufer KH (2011a) Combinatorial auctions in freight logistics. In: Proceedings of the Second international conference on Computational logistics, pp 1–17

  • Ackermann H, Ewe H, Küfer K-H, Schröder M (2011b) Modeling profit sharing in combinatorial exchanges by network flows, ITWM Report. http://www.itwm.fraunhofer.de/fileadmin/ITWM-Media/Zentral/Pdf/Berichte_ITWM/2011/bericht_205.pdf

  • Agarwal R, Ergun O (2009) Mechanism design for a multicommodity flow game in service network alliances. Oper Res Lett 36(5):520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnetis A, Pacciarelli D, Pacifici A (2007) Combinatorial models for multi-agent scheduling problems, multiprocessor scheduling, theory and applications. I-Tech Education and Publishing, Vienna, pp 21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel L (2006) An efficient dynamic auction for heterogeneous commodities. Am Econ Rev 96(3):602–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger S, Bierwirth C (2010) Solutions to the request reassignment problem in collaborative carrier networks. Transp Res Part E 46(5):627–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumrosen L, Nisan N (2007) Combinatorial auctions. In: Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani V (eds) Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–300

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dai B, Chen HX (2009) Mathematical model and solution approach for collaborative logistics in less than truckload (LTL) transportation. 39th International conference on computers and industrial engineering. Troyes, pp 767–772

  • Dai B, Chen HX (2009b) A Benders decomposition approach for collaborative logistics planning with LTL transportation. The third international conference on operations and supply chain management. Wuhan pp 565–573

  • Dai B, Chen HX (2011) A multi-agent and auction based framework and approach for carrier collaboration. Logist Res 3(2–3):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai B, Chen HX (2012) Profit allocation mechanisms for carrier collaboration problem. Comput Ind Eng 62(2):633–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergun Ö, Kuyzu G, Savelsbergh M (2007a) Shipper collaboration. Comput Oper Res 34(6):1551–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergun Ö, Kuyzu G, Savelsbergh M (2007b) Reducing truckload transportation costs through collaboration. Transp Sci 41(2):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ML (2004) The lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Manag Sci 50(12 Supplement):1861–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez S, Peeta S, Kalafatas G (2011) A less-than-truckload carrier collaboration planning problem under dynamic capacities. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 47(6):933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holguín-Veras J, Xu N, Jong G, Maurer H (2009) An experimental economics investigation of shipper-carrier interactions in the choice of mode and shipment size in freight transport. Netw Spat Econ. http://www.springerlink.com/content/m2m8h0077h83p102/

  • Houghtalen L, Ergun Ö, Sokol J (2007) Designing allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances, Unpublished. http://www.agifors.org/award/submissions2007/Houghtalen_paper.pdf

  • Kalagnanam J, Parkes DC (2004) Auction, bidding and exchange design. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the e-business era. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin, pp 143–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewska MA, Kopfer H (2006) Collaborating freight forwarding enterprises: request allocation and profit sharing. OR Spectr 28(2):301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutanoglu E, Wu SD (1999) On combinatorial auction and lagrangean relaxation for distributed resource. IIE Trans 31(9):813–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon RH, Lee CG, Ma Z (2005) An integrated combinatorial auction mechanism for truckload transportation procurement. Working paper, Unpublished, University of Toronto, Canada. http://www.mie.utoronto.ca/labs/ilr/MultiRound.pdf

  • Lee CG, Kwon RH, Ma Z (2007) A carrier’s optimal bid generation problem in combinatorial auctions for transportation procurement. Transp Res Part E 43(2):173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh PB, Yu DQ, Soorapanth S, Khibnik AI, Rajamani R (2005) A Lagrangian relaxation based approach to schedule asset overhaul and repair services. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2(2):145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mes M (2008) Sequential auctions for full truckload allocation. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands

  • Mes M, Van der Heijden M (2007) Pricing and scheduling strategies for carriers and shippers in sequential transportation auctions. In: Proceedings of the sixth triennial symposium on transportation analysis, Phuket Island

  • Parkes DC (2006) Iterative combinatorial auctions. In: Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R (eds) Combinatorial auctions, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind M, Gujo O, Vykoukal J (2009) A combinatorial intra-enterprise exchange for logistics services. IseB 7(4):447–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (2004) Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces 34(4):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham Y, Brown KL (2009) Multiagent systems algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 329–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Zhao QC, Luh PB (2007) On the surrogate gradient algorithm for lagrangian relaxation. J Optim Theory Appl 133(3):413–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villahoz JJL, Martinez RO, Arauzo AA, Ordax JMG (2010). Price updating in combinatorial auctions for coordination of manufacturing multiagent systems. 8th International conference on practical applications of agents and multiagent systems, Springer, pp 201–207

  • Vries S, Vohra RV (2003) Combinatorial auctions: a survey. INFORMS J Comput 15(3):284–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Luh PB, Wang J (1999) Surrogate gradient algorithm for Lagrangian relaxation. J Optim Theory Appl 100(3):699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Dai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, B., Chen, H. & Yang, G. Price-setting based combinatorial auction approach for carrier collaboration with pickup and delivery requests. Oper Res Int J 14, 361–386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-014-0141-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-014-0141-1

Keywords

Navigation