Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory

  • Cases with Images
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Abbreviations

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

Computed tomography

d-TGA:

Dextro-transposition of the great arteries

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

FDG:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

LV:

Left ventricle

MPI:

Myocardial perfusion imaging

PET:

Positron emission tomography

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computerized tomography

TID:

Transient ischemic dilatation

References

  1. Ou P, Khraiche D, Celermajer DS, Agnoletti G, Le Quan Sang KH, Thalabard JC, Bonnet D. Mechanisms of coronary complications after the arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145(5):1263-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taqueti VR. Myocardial perfusion imaging in extreme obesity: Leveraging modern technologies to meet a modern challenge. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26(1):284-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0956-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson RC, Heller GV, Johnson LL, Case JA, Cullom SJ, Garcia EV, et al. Value of attenuation correction on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12(2):195-202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma P, Patel CD, Karunanithi S, Maharjan S, Malhotra A. Comparative accuracy of CT attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37(4):332-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31823ea16b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bajaj NS, Singh S, Farag A, El-Hajj S, Heo J, Iskandrian AE, Hage FG. The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23(3):390-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0441-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lester D, El-Hajj S, Farag AA, Bhambhvani P, Tauxe L, Heo J, Hage FG. Prognostic value of transient ischemic dilation with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23(5):1147-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0272-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill J, Timmis A. Exercise tolerance testing. BMJ 2002;324(7345):1084-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rywik TM, Zink RC, Gittings NS, Khan AA, Wright JG, O’Connor FC, Fleg JL. Independent prognostic significance of ischemic ST-segment response limited to recovery from treadmill exercise in asymptomatic subjects. Circulation 1998;97(21):2117-22. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.97.21.2117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katritsis DG, Zareba W, Camm AJ. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60(20):1993-2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, Page RL. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: Executive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72(14):1677-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolognese L, Neskovic AN, Parodi G, Cerisano G, Buonamici P, Santoro GM, Antoniucci D. Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. Circulation 2002;106(18):2351-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000036014.90197.fa.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quinones MA, Greenberg BH, Kopelen HA, Koilpillai C, Limacher MC, Shindler DM, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the SOLVD registry and trials: significance of left ventricular hypertrophy. Studies of left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35(5):1237-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00511-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Lai S, Cohen I, Lewin HC, Berman DS. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999;100(10):1035-42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Birnie DH, Sauer WH, Bogun F, Cooper JM, Culver DA, Duvernoy CS, Soejima K. HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Rhythm 2014;11(7):1305-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulten E, Aslam S, Osborne M, Abbasi S, Bittencourt MS, Blankstein R. Cardiac sarcoidosis-state of the art review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016;6(1):50-63. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2015.12.13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chareonthaitawee P, Beanlands RS, Chen W, Dorbala S, Miller EJ, Murthy VL, Blankstein R. Joint SNMMI-ASNC expert consensus document on the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Cardiac Sarcoid Detection And Therapy monitoring. J Nucl Med 2017;58(8):1341-53. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.196287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jefic D, Joel B, Good E, Morady F, Rosman H, Knight B, Bogun F. Role of radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in cardiac sarcoidosis: report from a multicenter registry. Heart Rhythm 2009;6(2):189-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Bajaj is supported by American College of Cardiology Presidential Career Development award, Walter B. Frommeyer, Junior Fellowship in Investigative Medicine and National Center for Advancing Translational Research of the National Institutes of Health under award number UL1TR001417. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American College of Cardiology or National Institutes of Health. Dr. Hage has grants/grants pending from Astellas Pharma, Novartis Pharma, and GE healthcare. Dr. Iskandrian receives payments for lectures from the Alabama American College of Cardiology chapter. The remainder of the authors have no disclosed conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vedran Oruc MD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 10891 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oruc, V., Smith, B., Bajaj, N.S. et al. Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 27, 305–314 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01985-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01985-5

Navigation