Advertisement

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 665–670 | Cite as

Technical aspects of acquiring and measuring myocardial blood flow: Method, technique, and QA

  • John R. Votaw
  • René R. Sevag Packard
Technologist Corner

Abstract

Measuring absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) is becoming a common aid for diagnosing patients suspected to have coronary artery disease. An MBF study, however, requires a scanner with high count rate capability, is more susceptible to artifacts, and is much more technically involved than static imaging, which leads to a greater risk of artifactual results contaminating the final result. This technical note gives the reader an introductory understanding of the method for calculating MBF. It then describes the scanning protocol, potential pitfalls and how to recognize them, and quality control steps that should be taken to avoid basing a clinical decision on possibly inaccurate flow information.

Keywords

PET Image quality Coronary flow reserve Coronary blood flow 

Abbreviations

MBF

Myocardial blood flow

BGO

Bismuth germanate

LSO

Lutetium oxyorthosilicate

LYSO

Lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate

GSO

Gadolinium oxyorthosilicate

ROI

Region of interest

TAC(s)

Time activity curve(s)

QC

Quality control

Notes

Disclosure

John R. Votaw has received consulting fees from Syntermed, Inc. René R. Sevag Packard reports no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Schindler TH, Schelbert H. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):623–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maddahi J, Packard RR. Cardiac PET perfusion tracers: Current status and future directions. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44(5):333–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moody JB, Lee BC. Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22(5):935–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105(4):539–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedman J, Van Train K. Upward creep of the heart: A frequent source of false-positive reversible defects during thallium-201 stress-redistribution SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(10):18–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations