Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging (CSP MPI) has been shown to reduce attenuation artifact in comparison to supine-only (SU) MPI in mixed-gender populations with varying risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), often where patients served as their own controls. However, there is limited direct comparison of these imaging strategies in men.

Methods

934 male patients underwent CSP or SU MPI. Diagnostic certainty of interpretation was compared. Within the cohort, 116 were referred for left heart catheterization (LHC) to assess for CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared with additional analysis based on body mass index (BMI).

Results

597 patients completed the SU protocol and 337 patients completed the CSP protocol. Equivocal studies were seen more frequently in the SU group (13%) than in the CSP group (4%, P < .001). At catheterization, the specificity for CSP MPI of 70% was higher than 40% for SU MPI (P = .032). The CSP AUC (0.80 ± 0.06) was significantly larger than SU AUC (0.57 ± 0.05, P = .004). CSP specificity was significantly higher in obese patients.

Conclusions

CSP MPI increases diagnostic certainty and improves test accuracy for CAD detection in men with CAD risk factors, especially obese patients, compared to SU MPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AC:

Attenuation correction

BMI:

Body mass index

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CSP:

Combined supine-prone

EKG:

Electrocardiogram

FFR:

Fractional flow reserve

LHC:

Left heart catheterization

MPI:

Myocardial perfusion imaging

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

SPECT:

Single photon emission computed tomography

SU:

Supine

References

  1. Hendel RC. Attenuation correction: Eternal dilemma or real improvement? J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;49:30-42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Esquerre J-P, Coca FJ, Martinez SJ, Guiraud RF. Prone decubitus: A solution to inferior wall attenuation in thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1989;30:398-401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Segall GM, Davis M. Prone versus supine thallium myocardial SPECT: A method to decrease artifactual inferior defects. J Nucl Med 1989;30:548-55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiat H, Van Train KF, Friedman JD, Germano G, Silagan G, Wang FP, et al. Quantitative stress-redistribution thallium-201 SPECT using prone imaging: Methodologic development and validation. J Nucl Med 1992;33:1509-15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Abidov A, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Berman DS, et al. Combined quantitative supine-prone myocardial perfusion SPECT improves detection of coronary artery disease and normalcy rates in women. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:44-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berman DS, Kang XP, Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Shaw LJ, Hayes SW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of gated Tc-99m sestamibi stress myocardial perfusion SPECT with combined supine and prone acquisitions to detect coronary artery disease in obese and non-obese patients. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:191-201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes SW, DeLorenzo A, Hachamovich R, Dhar SC, Hsu P, Cohen I, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1633-40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malkemeker D, Brenner R, Martin WH, Sampson UK, Feurer ID, Kronenberg MW, et al. CT-based attenuation correction versus prone imaging to decrease equivocal interpretation of rest/stress TC-99m tetrofosmin SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:314-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, et al. CCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation 2009;119:e561-87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Winchester DE, Kitchen A, Brandt JC, Dusaj RS, Virani SS, Bradley SM, et al. Metrics of quality care in veterans: Correlation between primary-care performance measures and inappropriate myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Cardiol 2015;38:195-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Grossman GB, Mcallister BD, Ward BD, Clinical Guidelines and Quality Standards, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. ASNC Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures: Standardized reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion and function. Am Soc Nucl Cardiol 2009. doi:10.1007/s12350-009-9095-8.11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hendel RC, Wackers FJ, Berman D, Ficaro E, DePuey E, Klein EG, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Consensus Statement: Reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:705-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A non-parametric approach. Biometrics 1998;44:837-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Abidov A, Yoda S, Akincioglu C, Kang X, et al. Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: Method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:51-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arsanjani R, Hayes SW, Fish M, Shalev A, Nakanishi R, Thomson L, et al. Two-position supine/prone myocardial perfusion SPECT(MPS) imaging improves visual inter-observer correlation and agreement. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:703-11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Perault C, Loboguerro A, Lien J-C, Wampach H, Gibold C, Ouzan J, et al. Quantitative comparison of prone and supine myocardial SPECT images. Clin Nucl Med 1994;20:678-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katayama T, Ogata N, Tsuruya Y. Diagnostic accuracy of supine and prone thallium-201 stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease in inferior wall of the left ventricle. Ann Nucl Med 2008;24:317-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Berman D, Forrester JS, Morris D, Swan HJC. The declining specificity of exercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med 1983;309:518-22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rozanski A, Berman D. The efficacy of cardiovascular nuclear medicine studies. Semin Nucl Med 1987;2:104-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Elrashidi MY, Flammer AJ, Lennon RJ, Bell MR, Holmes D, et al. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1375-83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Takamura T, Horiguchi Y, Kanna M, Matsushita H, Sudo Y, Kikuchi S, et al. Validation of prone myocardial perfusion SEPCT with a variable focus collimator versus supine myocardial perfusion SPECT with or without computed tomography-derived attenuation correction. Ann Nucl Med 2015. doi:10.1007/s12149-015-1019-x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malkerneker D, Brenner R, Martin WH, Sampson UK, Feurer ID, Kronenberg MW, et al. CT-based attenuation correction versus prone imaging to decrease equivocal interpretations of rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:314-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reyes E, Wiener S, Underwood SR, European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: A survey of the European Council of Nuclear. Cardiology 2012;39:160-4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shin J, Pokhara H, Williams K, Mehta R, Ward RP. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with prone only acquisitions: Correlation with coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:590-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicente Taasan MD.

Additional information

See related editorial, doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0389-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taasan, V., Wokhlu, A., Taasan, M.V. et al. Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 23, 1470–1476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0358-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0358-2

Keywords

Navigation