References
Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial. Circulation 2011;124:1239-49.
Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:709-18.
Fazel R, Gerber TC, Balter S, Brenner DJ, Carr JJ, Cerqueira MD, et al. Approaches to enhancing radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;130:1730-48.
Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2201-29.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Jane Dunne for assistance in organizing the ethics session.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, A.V., Kontak, A., Shaw, L.J. et al. How to approach an inappropriately ordered myocardial perfusion stress study: A case-based ethics discussion. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 22, 923–926 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0231-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0231-3