Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: The value of nuclear cardiology techniques

  • Debate Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

References

  1. Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B, Perugini A, Kim H, Jones C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease. Clinical perspective: A bivariate meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:700-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma P, Patel CD, Karunanithi S. Comparative accuracy of CT attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37:332-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:74-82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman D. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003;107:2900-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tio RA, Dabeshlim A, Siebelink HM, De Sutter J, Hillege HL, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Comparison between the prognostic value of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Med 2009;50:214-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1828-37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Klein J, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2012;126:1858-68.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bengel FM. Leaving relativity behind: Quantitative clinical perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:749-51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neglia D, Michelassi C, Trivieri MG, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Pratali L, et al. Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2002;105:186-93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taqueti VR, Hachamovitch R, Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, et al. Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization. Circulation 2015;131:19-27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells RG, Timmins R, Klein R, Lockwood J, Marvin B, Wei L, et al. Dynamic SPECT measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in a porcine model. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1685-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Lai S, Cohen I, Lewin HC, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999;100:1035-42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tillisch J, Brunken R, Marshall R, Schwaiger M, Mandelkern M, Phelps M, et al. Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography. N Engl J Med 1986;314:884-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E, Humen D, Racine N, Freeman M, et al. F-18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: A randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2002-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abraham A, Nichol G, Williams KA, Guo A, Garrard L, Davies RA, et al. 18F-FDG PET imaging of myocardial viability in an experienced center with access to 18F-FDG and integration with clinical management teams: The Ottawa-FIVE substudy of the PARR 2 trial. J Nucl Med 2010;51:567-74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobson AF, Senior R, Cerqueira MD, Wong ND, Thomas GS, Lopez VA, et al. Myocardial iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure. Results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2212-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerson MC, Caldwell JH, Ananthasubramaniam K, Clements IP, Henzlova MJ, Amanullah A, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on prognostic utility of imaging of myocardial sympathetic innervation in heart failure patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:87-93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fallavollita JA, Heavey BM, Luisi AJ Jr, Michalek SM, Baldwa S, Mashtare TL, et al. Regional myocardial sympathetic denervation predicts the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:141-9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schatka I, Bengel FM. Advanced imaging of cardiac sarcoidosis. J Nucl Med 2014;55:99-106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bengel FM. The non-invasive biopsy: Molecular imaging for the detection of cardiac involvement in systemic disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1299-300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Caobelli is supported by a fellowship grant from Mallinckrodt Pharma. Dr. Bengel receives research grants from Mallinckrodt Pharma and Siemens, and speaker honoraria from Bayer, Siemens, GE Healthcare and Mallinckrodt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl Neuberg Straße, 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany

    Federico Caobelli MD, FEBNM & Frank M. Bengel MD, FAHA

Authors
  1. Federico Caobelli MD, FEBNM
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank M. Bengel MD, FAHA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank M. Bengel MD, FAHA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caobelli, F., Bengel, F.M. Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: The value of nuclear cardiology techniques. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 22, 971–974 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0128-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0128-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation