Abstract
Background
We have recently validated a quarter-time protocol in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging named IQ-SPECT, whose basic principle is to implement a multifocal collimator; However, in clinical practice, it may sometimes be difficult to center the heart in the region of highest magnification of the multifocal collimators (the so-called sweet spot). We therefore aimed to evaluate whether a heart mispositioning may affect results in MPI.
Methods
We simulated a rest study with an anthropomorphic phantom with an in vivo distribution of 400 MBq [99mTc]tetrofosmin, with and without a transmural defect (TD). For each set of images, we performed 5 acquisitions, one with a correct centering and with other 4 degrees of mispositioning. Raw data and reconstructed images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, including no corrections, correction for attenuation, for scatter or for both. We assessed polar plot uniformity, LV wall thickness, and TD and cavity contrast.
Results
Images obtained either with a correct heart centering or with mild misposition showed no differences, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Those obtained with major mispositioning differed in uniformity and TD contrast depending on correction parameters.
Conclusion
This is the first study investigating how a heart mispositioning can affect diagnostic accuracy with IQ-SPECT system. Mild-to-moderate mispositioning (≤2.5 cm) is unlikely to significantly affect results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garcia EV, Faber TL, Esteves FB. Cardiac dedicated ultrafast SPECT cameras: New designs and clinical implications. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:210–7.
Caobelli F, Pizzocaro C, Paghera B, Guerra UP. Evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease. IQ-SPECT protocol in myocardial perfusion imaging: Preliminary results. Nuklearmedizin. 2013;52:178–85.
Rajaram R, Bhattacharya M, Ding X, Malmin R, Rempel TD, Vija H, Zeintl J. Tomographic performance characteristics of the IQ-SPECT system. In: IEEE nuclear science symposium conference record; 2011.
Higley B, Smith FW, Smith T, Gemmell HG, Das Gupta P, Gvozdanovic DV, et al. Technetium-99m-1,2-bis[bis(2-ethoxyethyl)phosphino]ethane: Human biodistribution, dosimetry and safety of a new myocardial perfusion imaging agent. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:30–8.
Zoccarato O, Scabbio C, De Ponti E, Matheoud R, Leva L, Morzenti S, Menzaghi M, Campini R, Marcassa C, Del Sole A, Garancini S, Crivellaro C, Brambilla M, Lecchi M. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:135–48.
Rasband WS. ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: U. S. National Institutes of Health; 1997-2012. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
Imbert L, Poussier S, Franken PR, Songy B, Verger A, Morel O, Wolf D, Noel A, Karcher G, Marie PY. Compared performance of high-sensitivity cameras dedicated to myocardial perfusion SPECT: A comprehensive analysis of phantom and human images. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1897–903.
Dong X, Niu T, Jia X, Zhu L. Relationship between X-ray illumination field size and flat field intensity and its impacts on X-ray imaging. Med Phys. 2012;39:5901–9.
Hindorf C, Oddstig J, Hedeer F, Hansson MJ, Jögi J, Engblom H. Importance of correct patient positioning in myocardial perfusion SPECT when using a CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:695–702.
Ethical Standard
The research reported in the paper was undertaken in compliance with the Helsinki declaration and the International Principles governing research on animals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors disclosure of any personal or financial support or author involvement with organization(s) with financial interest in the subject matter—or any actual or potential conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caobelli, F., Ren Kaiser, S., Thackeray, J.T. et al. The importance of a correct positioning of the heart using IQ-SPECT system with multifocal collimators in myocardial perfusion imaging: A phantom study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 22, 57–65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9994-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9994-1