Skip to main content
Log in

A novel clinically relevant segmentation method and corresponding maximal ischemia score to risk-stratify patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) represents a key prognostic tool, but its predictive yield is far from perfect. We developed a novel clinically relevant segmentation method and a corresponding maximal ischemia score (MIS) in order to risk-stratify patients undergoing MPS.

Methods

Patients referred for MPS were identified, excluding those with evidence of myocardial necrosis or prior revascularization. A seven-region segmentation approach was adopted for left ventricular myocardium, with a corresponding MIS distinguishing five groups (no, minimal, mild, moderate, or severe ischemia). The association between MIS and clinical events was assessed at 1 year and at long-term follow-up.

Results

A total of 8,714 patients were included, with a clinical follow-up of 31 ± 20 months. Unadjusted analyses showed that subjects with a higher MIS were significantly different for several baseline and test data, being older, having lower ejection fraction, and achieving lower workloads (P < .05 for all). Adverse outcomes were also more frequent in patients with higher levels of ischemia, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and their composites (P < .05 for all). Differences in adverse events remained significant even after extensive multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio for each MIS increment = 1.57 [1.29-1.90], P < .001 for cardiac death; 1.19 [1.04-1.36], P = .013 for MI; 1.23 [1.09-1.39], P = .001 for cardiac death/MI).

Conclusions

Our novel segmentation method and corresponding MIS efficiently yield satisfactory prognostic information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beller GA. First annual Mario S. Verani, MD, Memorial lecture: Clinical value of myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:529-42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark AN, Beller GA. The present role of nuclear cardiology in clinical practice. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;49:43-58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:240-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:200-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang SJ, Cho YR, Park GM, Ahn JM, Han SB, Lee JY, et al. Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: An integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1183-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen CL, Goldstein RA, Akinboboye OO, Berman DS, Botvinick EH, Churchwell KB, et al. Myocardial perfusion and function: Single photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:e39-60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaduganathan P, He ZX, Vick GW 3rd, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin: A comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6:3-10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cerci RJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, George RT, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Mehra V, et al. Aligning coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion territories: An algorithm for the CORE320 multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:587-95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Candell-Riera J, Ferreira-González I, Marsal JR, Aguadé-Bruix S, Cuberas-Borrós G, Pujol P, et al. Usefulness of exercise test and myocardial perfusion-gated single photon emission computed tomography to improve the prediction of major events. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:531-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DePasquale EE, Nody AC, DePuey EG, Garcia EV, Pilcher G, Bredlau C, et al. Quantitative rotational thallium-201 tomography for identifying and localizing coronary artery disease. Circulation 1988;77:316-27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Wang FP, van Train K, Matzer L, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: A clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1455-64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereztol-Valdés O, Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Angel J, Aguadé-Bruix S, Castell-Conesa J, Garcia EV, Soler-Soler J. Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2637-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003;107:2900-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: Results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117:1283-91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

All authors have no funding or conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Nudi MD.

Additional information

See related editorial, doi:10.1007/s12350-014-9929-x.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 68 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nudi, F., Pinto, A., Procaccini, E. et al. A novel clinically relevant segmentation method and corresponding maximal ischemia score to risk-stratify patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 21, 807–818 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9877-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9877-5

Keywords

Navigation