Skip to main content

Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the incremental diagnostic value of fusion images of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) over MPI alone or MPI and CTA side-by-side to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD > 50% stenosis) using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the gold standard.

Methods

50 subjects (36 men; 56 ± 11 years old) underwent rest-stress MPI and CTA within 12-26 days of each other. CTAs were performed with multi-detector CT-scanners (31 on 64-slice; and 19 on 16-slice). 37 patients underwent ICA while 13 subjects did not because of low (<5%) pre-test likelihood (LLK) of disease. Three blinded readers scored the images in sequential sessions using (1) MPI alone (2) MPI and CTA side-by-side, (3) fused CTA/MPI images.

Results

One or more critical stenoses during ICA were found in 28 patients and non-critical stenoses were found in 9 patients. MPI, side-by-side MPI-CTA, and fused CTA/MPI showed the same normalcy rate (NR:13/13) in LLK subjects. The fusion technique performed better than MPI and MPI and CTA side-by-side for the presence of CAD in any vessel (overall area under the curve (AUC) for fused images: 0.89; P = .005 vs MPI, P = .04 vs side-by-side MPI-CTA) and for localization of CAD to the left anterior descending coronary artery (AUC: 0.82, P < .001 vs MPI; P = .007 vs side-by-side MPI-CTA). There was a non-significant trend for better detection of multi-vessel disease with fusion.

Conclusions

Using ICA as the gold standard, fusion imaging provided incremental diagnostic information compared to MPI alone or side-by-side MPI-CTA for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD and for localization of CAD to the left anterior descending coronary artery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  1. Shaw LJ, Shaw RE, Merz CN, et al. Impact of ethnicity and gender differences on angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and in-hospital mortality in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2008;117:1787-801.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2004;232:18-37.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman TM, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:263-72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Case JAPT, O’Brian-Penny B, King MA, Luo DS, Rabin MSZ. Reduction of truncation artifacts in fan beam transmission imaging using a spatially varying gamma prior. IEEE-TNS 1995;42:1310-20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nichols KJ, Bacharach SL, Bergmann SR, et al. Instrumentation quality assurance and performance. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:e25-41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nye JA, Esteves F, Votaw JR. Minimizing artifacts resulting from respiratory and cardiac motion by optimization of the transmission scan in cardiac PET/CT. Med Phys 2007;34:1901-6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-824.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Faber TL, Santana CA, Garcia EV, et al. Three-dimensional fusion of coronary arteries with myocardial perfusion distributions: Clinical validation. J Nucl Med 2004;45:745-53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1059-67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: Clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2007;48:696-703.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by General Electric healthcare LTD; National Institute of Health, NHLBI grant number K01 HL70422; Carlos III Institute; Thematic networks of cooperative research, (Red C03/01, RECAVA), and National Institute of Health; NHLBI grant number R01 HL085417. Two of the authors (TLF, EVG) receive royalties from the sale of the Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ utilized to conduct the research described in this article. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with it is conflict-of-interest practice.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Raggi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santana, C.A., Garcia, E.V., Faber, T.L. et al. Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 16, 201–211 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-008-9019-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-008-9019-z

Keywords

  • Myocardial perfusion imaging
  • SPECT
  • PET imaging
  • computed tomography (CT)
  • coronary artery disease
  • diagnostic and prognostic application