Advertisement

Nutritional concerns of cancer patients and their families

  • M. N. Patella
  • D. Goldin
  • M. Aggujaro
  • L. De Gobbi
  • R. Giarretta
  • E. Michieli
  • P. Pallini
  • G. Ronzani
  • E. Salice
  • P. Fiduccia
  • R. Pertile
  • D. Fedele
Original Article

Abstract

Aim and methods

Nutrition, unhealthy lifestyles and cancer appear to be strictly related, but few authors have analysed the interest in dietary information of cancer patients and their families. This survey was conducted in the Veneto area (Italy) to investigate the concern of cancer patients and their family members about diet as a health tool before and after diagnosis of cancer.

Results

Seven hundred and four questionnaires were collected: 380 from cancer patients and 324 from family members of cancer subjects. Breast cancer (BC) was the most frequent disease for patients (61.8%) as well as families (26.5%). Generally, the importance of having precise diet information after diagnosis is recognised by 40.3% of patients, with significant differences between the various types of cancer: gastric and colon/rectum cancer (GCC) patients were more concerned than BC women about precise information concerning a diet to follow immediately after diagnosis (p = 0.000, ODs = 3.10, CI 1.68–5.71) or during treatments (p = 0.001, ODs = 2.67, CI 1.46–4.89). The nutritional information is supplied to patients in 34% of cases and to relatives in 30.3%, often from non-medical sources. In total healthcare workers (family doctor, oncologist, surgeon, dietician) represented the exclusive source of dietary information for 24.9% of patients and 22.9% of family members. Diet after diagnosis changes in 69.1% of GCC patients and in 39.2% of BC women. Relatives, particularly women, report difficulties preparing patients’ meals in 30.7% of cases, changes in the eating habits of the entire family in 29.9% and discontent connected with patients diet in 13.9%. The concern about proper nutrition after diagnosis increases more in GCC subjects (p < 0.025) when compared to BC subjects and in patients with more recent diagnosis (p < 0.041) when compared with patients with diagnosis >5 years ago, while in family members the interest in diet after diagnosis increases more in women than in men (p < 0.030) without other differences regarding the degree of relationship, type of cancer or diagnosis time. Relatives (92.7%) have more interest in nutritional education than patients (74.9%). Cancer patients <65 years were more interested in educational initiatives concerning nutrition (p = 0.000, ODs = 4.46, CI 2.6–7.4) than older patients (>65 years) and female subjects were more concerned than male patients (p = 0.008, ODs = 2.11, CI 1.2–3.6).

Conclusions

The interest in the dietary knowledge and in educational initiatives concerning nutrition is high in cancer patients and their relatives, although it decreases with the age. The poor attention paid to nutrition of cancer patients by various healthcare workers deserves consideration, since the psychophysical wellbeing and perhaps also survival of cancer patients can be improved by correct dietary management, as well as, naturally, by the principal treatments themselves.

Keywords

Nutritional interest Nutritional education Breast cancer Gastric and colon/rectum cancer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Key TJ, Schatzkin A, Willet WC et al (2004) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 7:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bingham SA, Day NE, Luben R et al (2003) Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet 361:1496–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Key TJ, Allen NE, Spencer EA, Travis RC (2002) The effect of diet on risk of cancer. Lancet 360:861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ (2003) Overweight, obesity and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 348:1625–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berclaz G, Li S, Price KN et al (2004) Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group experience. Ann Oncol 15:875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camoriano JK, Loprinzi CL, Ingle JN et al (1990) Weight change in women treated with adjuvant therapy or observed following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 8:1327–1334Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT et al (1980) Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med 69:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Segura A, Pardo J, Jara C et al (2005) An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clin Nutr 24:801–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rivadeneira DE, Evoy D, Fahey III TJ et al (1998) Nutritional support of the cancer patient. CA Cancer J Clin 48:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wen KY, Gustafson DH (2004) Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Quality Life Outcomes 2:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carlson LE, Angen M, Cullum J et al (2004) High level of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90:2297–2304Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Halteren HK, Bongaerts GPA, Wagener DJ (2004) Cancer and psychosocial distress: frequent companions. Lancet 364:824–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rossi Ferrario S, Zotti AM, Ippoliti M, Zotti P (2003) Caregiving-related needs analysis: a proposed model reflecting current research and socio-political developments. Health Soc Care Community 11:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grunfeld E, Coyle D, Whelan T et al (2004) Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ 170:1795–1801Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weitzner MA, McMillan SC, Jacobsen PB (1999) Family caregivers quality of life: differences between curative and palliative cancer treatment settings. J Pain Symptom Manage 17:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rossi Ferrario S, Cardillo V, Vicario F et al (2004) Advanced cancer at home: caregiving and bereavement. Palliat Med 18:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. JAMA 282:2215–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monnin S, Schiller MR, Sachs L, Smith AM (1993) Nutritional concerns of women with breast cancer. J Cancer Educ 8:63–69Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feather BL, Wainstoch JM, Remington A, Ringenberg QS (1988) Postmastectomy educational needs and social support. J Cancer Educ 3:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chlebowski RT, Aiello E, McTiernan A (2002) Weight loss in breast cancer patient management. J Clin Oncol 20:1128–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Courneya KS, Katzmarzyk PT, Bacon E (2008) Physical activity and obesity in Canadian cancer survivors: population-based estimates from the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey. Cancer 112:2475–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal PM, Camilo ME (2005) Dietary counselling improves patient outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in colorectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:1431–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hartmuller VW, Desmond SM (2004) Professional and patient perspectives on nutritional needs of patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kottke TE, Foels JK, Hill C et al (1984) Nutrition counseling in private practice: attitudes and activities of family physicians. Prev Med 13:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fatati G, Mirri E, Venturi S et al (2004) A management initiative: the obesity day. In: Fatati G (ed) 277.7: From insulin-resistance to metabolic syndrome. Critical Medicine Publishing, Rome, pp 294–304Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin (53):356–371Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Woerkum CMJ (2003) The Internet and primary care physicians: coping with different expectations. Am J Clin Nutr 77:1016S–1018SGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eysenbach GT, Diepgen TL (1999) Labeling and filtering of medical information on the Internet. Methods Inf Med 38:80–88Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wayne SJ, Lopez ST, Butler LM et al (2004) Changes in dietary intake after diagnosis of breast cancer. J Am Diet Assoc 104:1561–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rock CL and Demark-Wahnefried W (2002) Nutrition and survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer: a review of the evidence. J Clin Oncol 20:3302–3316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Demark-Wahnefried W, Peterson B, McBride C et al (2000) Current health behaviors and readiness to pursue life-style changes among men and women diagnosed with early stage prostate and breast carcinomas. Cancer 88:674–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thomson CA, Flatt SW, Rock CL et al (2002) Increased fruit, vegetable and fiber intake and lower fat intake reported among women previously treated for invasive breast cancer. J Am Diet Assoc 102:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pierce JP, Newman AV, Flatt SW et al for the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study Group (2004) Telephone counseling intervention increases intakes of micronutrient- and phytochemical-rich vegetables, fruit and fiber in breast cancer survivor. J Nutr 134:452–458Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Worsley A (2002) Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour? Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 11:S579–S585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Silver HJ, Wellman NS (2002) Nutrition education may reduce burden in family caregivers of older adults. J Nutr Educ Behav 34:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Patella
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Goldin
    • 2
  • M. Aggujaro
    • 2
  • L. De Gobbi
    • 2
  • R. Giarretta
    • 2
  • E. Michieli
    • 2
  • P. Pallini
    • 2
  • G. Ronzani
    • 2
  • E. Salice
    • 2
  • P. Fiduccia
    • 3
  • R. Pertile
    • 4
  • D. Fedele
    • 1
  1. 1.Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition UnitULSS (Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria) 16PaduaItaly
  2. 2.Italian Association of Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition (ADI)Veneto AreaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)PaduaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical PsychologyUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations