Abstract
The isosceles three-body problem with nonnegative energy is studied from a variational point of view based on the Jacobi–Maupertuis metric. The solutions are represented by geodesics in the two-dimensional configuration space. Since the metric is singular at collisions, an approach based on the theory of length spaces is used. This provides an alternative to the more familiar approach based on the principle of least action. The emphasis is on the existence and properties of minimal geodesics, that is, shortest curves connecting two points in configuration space. For any two points, even singular points, a minimal geodesic exists and is nonsingular away from the endpoints. For the zero energy case, it is possible to use knowledge of the behavior of the flow on the collision manifold to see that certain solutions must be minimal geodesics. In particular, the geodesic corresponding to the collinear homothetic solution turns out to be a minimal for certain mass ratios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barutello, V., Secchi, S.: Morse index properties of colliding solutions to the N-body problem. Ann Inst. Henri Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 25, 539–565 (2008)
Burago, D., Burago, Y., Ivanov, S.: A Course in Metric Geometry. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 33. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2001)
Chenciner, A.: Action minimizing solutions of the Newtonian n-body problem: from homology to symmetry. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics, vol. III (Beijing), pp. 279–294, Higner Ed. Press (2002)
Da Luz, A., Maderna, E.: On free time minimizers for the newtonian \(N\)-body problem. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 156, 209–227 (2014)
Devaney, R.: Triple collision in the planar isosceles three-body problem. Invent. Math. 60, 249–267 (1980)
Ewing, G.M.: Calculus of Variations with Applications. Dover, New York (1985)
Gromov, M.: Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces. Birkhauser, Basel (1999)
Maderna, E., Venturelli, A.: Globally minimizing parabolic motions in the Newtonian N-body problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. 194, 283–313 (2009). arxiv: 1502.06278
Marchal, C.: How the minimization of action avoids singularities. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 83, 325–354 (2002)
McGehee, R.: Triple collision in the collinear three-body problem. Invent. Math. 27, 191–227 (1974)
McGehee, R.: Singularities in classical celestial mechanics. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Helsinki), pp. 827–834 (1978)
Moeckel, R.: Orbits of the three-body problem which pass infinitely close to triple collision. Am. J. Math. 103(6), 1323–1341 (1981)
Moeckel, R., Montgomery, R., Venturelli, A.: From brake to syzygy. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 204(3), 1009–1060 (2012)
Moeckel, R., Montgomery, R., Sánchez Morgado, H.: Free time minimizers for the three-body problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 130, 28 (2018)
Percino, B., Sánchez Morgado, H.: Busemann functions for the N-body problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. 213(3), 981–991 (2014)
Pugh, C.: Real Mathematical Analysis. Springer, New York (2002)
Rinow, W.: Die innere Geometrie der metrische Räume. Springer, New York (1961)
Simo, C.: Analysis of triple collision in the isosceles problem. In: Devaney, R.L., Nitecki, Z. (eds.) Classical Mechanics and Dynamical Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York (1980)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NSF Grant DMS-1712656. It was also supported by MSRI, Berkeley, during the semester on Hamiltonian Systems in the Fall of 2019. It benefitted from helpful discussions with R.Montgomery, G. Yu, N. Duignan and C. Jackman. I am grateful to a referee for pointing our several significant errors in the first version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moeckel, R. Minimal Geodesics of the Isosceles Three Body Problem. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 19, 48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00381-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00381-6