Abstract
The technological development in endoscopy is directed toward improved accuracy of the diagnoses of novel diseases. The capsule endoscope and balloon-assisted endoscope are examples of such technological development. By these novel technologies, the small intestine can be examined in more detail. Therefore, an increasing number of novel diseases have been discovered, requiring the establishment of diagnosis and treatment strategies for these unknown diseases. In particular, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn’s disease, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy are of great interest to endoscopists. The capsule endoscope is the best method for screening the small intestine; however, the development of supporting methods such as the patency capsule is eagerly desired.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fisher L, Lee Krinsky M, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Ben-Menachem T, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:471–9.
Leighton JA, Goldstein J, Hirota W, Jacobson BC, Johanson JF, Mallery JS, et al. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:650–5.
Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E, Abbiati C, Beccari G, Rossini FP, et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:643–53.
de Leusse A, Vahedi K, Edery J, Tiah D, Fery-Lemonnier E, Cellier C, et al. Capsule endoscopy or push enteroscopy for first-line exploration of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? Gastroenterology 2007;132:855–62 (quiz 1164–5).
Pasha SF, Hara AK, Leighton JA. Diagnostic evaluation and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a changing paradigm. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2009;5:839–50.
Carey EJ, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, Shiff AD, Sharma VK, Post JK, et al. A single-center experience of 260 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:89–95.
Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI, Gurudu SR, Fleischer DE, Hara AK, et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:954–64.
Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, Cipolletta L. Meta-analysis: capsule enteroscopy vs. conventional modalities in diagnosis of small bowel diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:595–604.
Dionisio PM, Gurudu SR, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI, Fleischer DE, Hara AK, et al. Capsule endoscopy has a significantly higher diagnostic yield in patients with suspected and established small-bowel Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1240–8 (quiz 1249).
Efthymiou A, Viazis N, Mantzaris G, Papadimitriou N, Tzourmakliotis D, Raptis S, et al. Does clinical response correlate with mucosal healing in patients with Crohn’s disease of the small bowel? A prospective, case-series study using wireless capsule endoscopy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1542–7.
Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, et al. Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1015–22.
Jensen MD, Nathan T, Rafaelsen SR, Kjeldsen J. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy for small bowel Crohn’s disease is superior to that of MR enterography or CT enterography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;9:124–9.
Rondonotti E, Sunada K, Yano T, Paggi S, Yamamoto H. Double-balloon endoscopy in clinical practice: where are we now? Dig Endosc. 2012;24:209–19.
Legnani P, Kornbluth A. Video capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease 2005. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:438–42.
Herrerias JM, Leighton JA, Costamagna G, Infantolino A, Eliakim R, Fischer D, et al. Agile patency system eliminates risk of capsule retention in patients with known intestinal strictures who undergo capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:902–9.
Bourreille A, Ignjatovic A, Aabakken L, Loftus EV Jr, Eliakim R, Pennazio M, et al. Role of small-bowel endoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an international OMED-ECCO consensus. Endoscopy. 2009;41:618–37.
Gorlewicz JL, Battaglia S, Smith BF, Ciuti G, Gerding J, Menciassi A, et al. Wireless insufflation of the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012.
Toennies JL, Ciuti G, Smith BF, Menciassi A, Valdastri P, Webster RJ. Toward tetherless insufflation of the GI tract. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:1946–9.
Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Susilo E, Menciassi A, Dario P, Ho CN, et al. Wireless therapeutic endoscopic capsule: in vivo experiment. Endoscopy. 2008;40:979–82.
Graham DY, Opekun AR, Willingham FF, Qureshi WA. Visible small-intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:55–9.
Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Lewis B, Gralnek IM, Zlotnick S, Fort JG. Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:133–41.
Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Theodors A, Gonzalez J, Bjarnason I. A quantitative analysis of NSAID-induced small bowel pathology by capsule enteroscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1172–8.
Fujimori S, Gudis K, Takahashi Y, Seo T, Yamada Y, Ehara A, et al. Distribution of small intestinal mucosal injuries as a result of NSAID administration. Eur J Clin Investig. 2010;40:504–10.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) to Y. Naito (no. 22590705) and by an Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through target-driven R&D to Y. Naito (no. AS2114020E) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handa, O., Naito, Y., Okayama, T. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of small intestinal diseases. Clin J Gastroenterol 6, 94–98 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-013-0364-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-013-0364-3