Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Burden of Recurrence in Completely Resected Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study Using Nationwide Claims Data of South Korea

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Although many patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience recurrence despite complete resection, few studies have reported on the corresponding economic burden. This study aimed to understand the economic impact of recurrence by measuring healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with recurrent stage IB-IIIA NSCLC.

Methods

Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment claims data from South Korea, we included patients who underwent complete resection for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC during the index period (January 1, 2012, to October 31, 2018). Patients who experienced recurrence were matched with those who did not using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching. The mean healthcare costs and resource utilization were analyzed from the date of complete resection to the last claims for cancer treatment. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to estimate the impact of covariates on healthcare costs. A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was conducted to analyze the healthcare costs between the two groups before and after recurrence.

Results

Patients with recurrence incurred higher healthcare costs, particularly in outpatient settings. The cost of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors primarily contributed to cost differences, and medication costs increased over time after complete resection. Patients with recurrence were also hospitalized more frequently (9.3 vs. 5.0, p < 0.0001) for a longer period (74 days vs. 42 days, p < 0.0001) than those without recurrence. GLM analysis showed that the total cost was 2.31-fold higher in patients with recurrence (95% confidence interval: 2.19–2.44). The DID analysis showed significantly increased total costs in patients with recurrence (β = 26,269, p < 0.0001), which was mostly attributed to medication costs (β = 17,951, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Recurrence of completely resected NSCLC leads to a substantial increase in healthcare costs and resource utilization. The results of this study show the economic burden of recurrence, which may help future economic analyses and resource allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Visbal AL, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2005;128(4):2933–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgensztern D, et al. Trends in stage distribution for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Database survey. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(1):29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta D, Lahiri B. Preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing lung resection surgery. Chest. 2003;123(6):2096–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laack E, Bokemeyer C, Hossfeld DK. Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. 2008;105(14):249–54.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pirker R. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2014;3(5):305–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blandin Knight S, et al. Progress and prospects of early detection in lung cancer. Open Biol. 2017;7(9): 170070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pignon JP, et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3552–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao P, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs for resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carnio S, et al. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: tumor based approaches including gene signatures. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2013;2(5):372–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Uramoto H, Tanaka F. Recurrence after surgery in patients with NSCLC. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2014;3(4):242–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fedor D, Johnson WR, Singhal S. Local recurrence following lung cancer surgery: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2013;22(3):156–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashimoto M, et al. Significant increase in circulating tumour cells in pulmonary venous blood during surgical manipulation in patients with primary lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18(6):775–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gainor JF. Adjuvant PD-L1 blockade in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2021;398(10308):1281–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sekihara K, et al. Long-term survival outcome after postoperative recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer: who is “cured” from postoperative recurrence? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52(3):522–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshino I, et al. Survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with postoperative recurrence at distant organs. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;7(4):204–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams BA, et al. Predicting postrecurrence survival among completely resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):1021–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin J, et al. Long-term results of combined-modality therapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(8):1989–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugimura H, et al. Survival after recurrent nonsmall-cell lung cancer after complete pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):409–17 ((discussion 417–8)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sasaki H, et al. Prognosis of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer following complete resection. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(4):1300–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Consonni D, et al. Lung cancer prognosis before and after recurrence in a population-based setting. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):djv059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi PJ, Jeong SS, Yoon SS. Prediction and prognostic factors of post-recurrence survival in recurred patients with early-stage NSCLC who underwent complete resection. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(1):152–60.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, 2022 Feb 7. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US); 2002.

  24. Zimmermann FB, Molls M, Jeremic B. Treatment of recurrent disease in lung cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21(2):122–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim H, Liew D, Goodall S. Cost-effectiveness and financial risks associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(9):1703–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim MK, Kim KS. Factors affecting health care utilization in patients with lung cancer. Perspect Nurs Sci. 2013;10(1):52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sheehan DF, et al. Lung cancer costs by treatment strategy and phase of care among patients enrolled in Medicare. Cancer Med. 2019;8(1):94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Andreas S, et al. Economic burden of resected (Stage IB-IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer in France, Germany and the United Kingdom: a retrospective observational study (LuCaBIS). Lung Cancer. 2018;124:298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jo C. Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014;20(4):327–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JS, et al. The impact of systemic treatment on brain metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective nationwide population-based cohort study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shim YB, et al. Economic burden of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients in South Korea: a retrospective cohort study using nationwide claims data. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(9): e0274876.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rassen JA, et al. One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(Suppl 2):69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Okada M, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors of five-year survivors with complete resection of non–small cell lung carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(2):558–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee HY, et al. Clinical characteristics and economic burden of tuberculous-destroyed lung in Korea: a National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort-based study. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(6):2324–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Warton EM, Permanente K. Time after time: difference-in-differences and interrupted time series models in SAS. SAS Global Forum, 2020.

  37. Choi PJ, Jeong SS, Yoon SS. Prognosis of recurrence after complete resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;46(6):449–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kelsey CR, et al. Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer. 2009;115(22):5218–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Soh J, et al. Ethnicity affects EGFR and KRAS gene alterations of lung adenocarcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(3):1775–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Galvez C, et al. The role of EGFR mutations in predicting recurrence in early and locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma following definitive therapy. Oncotarget. 2020;11(21):1953–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Verleger K, et al. Costs and cost drivers associated with non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received two or more lines of therapy in Europe. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;12:23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeon SM, et al. Economic burden of lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study in South Korea, 2002–2015. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2): e0212878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee JG, Kim HC, Choi CM. Recent trends of lung cancer in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2021;84(2):89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kojima K, et al. PD-L1 expression as a predictor of postoperative recurrence and the association between the PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Shigematsu H, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(5):339–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Planchard D, et al. Differential expression of biomarkers in men and women. Semin Oncol. 2009;36(6):553–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wen M, et al. Detection of EML4-ALK fusion gene and features associated with EGFR mutations in Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Onco Targ Ther. 2016;9:1989–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Doval D, et al. Clinical and epidemiological study of EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK fusion genes among Indian patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Onco Targ Ther. 2015;8:117–23.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pan Y, et al. Unique distribution of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in East Asian non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(8):2579–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Walter J, et al. “Age matters”-German claims data indicate disparities in lung cancer care between elderly and young patients. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6): e0217434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Yoneyama R, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment strategies for young lung cancer patients. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(5):100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Banegas MP, et al. Medical care costs associated with cancer in integrated delivery systems. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(4):402–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Suidan AM, et al. Lung cancer in young patients: higher rate of driver mutations and brain involvement, but better survival. J Glob Oncol. 2019;5:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gergen AK, Scott CD, Mitchell JD. Surgery for limited stage small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(10):6291–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Park JY, Jang SH. Epidemiology of lung cancer in Korea: recent trends. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2016;79(2):58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Service NHI. A survey on the actual condition of health insurance patients' medical expenses in 2020: National health insurance, 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

In this study, the journal’s Rapid Service Fees was supported by AstraZeneca, Korea.

Medical Writing, Editorial, and Other Assistance

We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

Authorship

All authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Joo-Young Byun, Ju-Eun Lee, Yoon-Bo Shim, Mi-Hai Park, and Eui-Kyung Lee. Methodology: Joo-Young Byun, Ju-Eun Lee, Yoon-Bo Shim, Mi-Hai Park, and Eui-Kyung Lee. Formal analysis and Investigation: Joo-Young Byun, Ju-Eun Lee; Writing—original draft preparation: Joo-Young Byun and Ju-Eun Lee. Writing—review and editing: Joo-Young Byun, Ju-Eun Lee, Jihyun Kim, Sun Young Lee, Bo Ra Shin, Na Ri Yoon, Mi-Hai Park, and Eui-Kyung Lee. Funding acquisition: Eui-Kyung Lee; Resources: Mi-Hai Park, Eui-Kyung Lee; Supervision: Mi-Hai Park, Eui-Kyung Lee. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this article and have approved this version for publication.

Disclosures

Joo-Young Byun, Ju-Eun Lee, and Yoon-Bo Shim have nothing to disclose. Mi-Hai Park and Eui-Kyung Lee have received research grants from AstraZeneca. Jihyun Kim, Sun Young Lee, Bo Ra Shin, and Na Ri Yoon are the employees of AstraZeneca.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Sungkyunkwan University (IRB no. SKKU202101026). This study was a retrospective cohort analysis using healthcare claims data from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) of South Korea; therefore, the requirement for informed consent was waived. The HIRA data used in this study were anonymously recorded.

Data Availability

The datasets generated in this study are potentially identifiable from the corresponding author on reasonable request but are not publicly available owing to ethical restrictions by the HIRA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mi-Hai Park or Eui-Kyung Lee.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 276 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byun, JY., Lee, JE., Shim, YB. et al. Economic Burden of Recurrence in Completely Resected Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study Using Nationwide Claims Data of South Korea. Adv Ther 40, 550–567 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02358-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02358-0

Keywords

Navigation