Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Fasting Glucose Levels on Achieving Glycemic Target in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: a Post Hoc Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

FPG GOAL was a 24-week, open-label, treat-to-target randomized controlled trial which demonstrated that the optimal self-monitored fasting blood glucose (SM-FBG) target for most Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using insulin glargine 100 IU/mL was 3.9–6.1 mmol/L. Individuals who achieved lower fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels might achieve the target HbA1c of < 7% without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Methods

For this post hoc analysis, individuals were redivided into three groups based on their actual laboratory FPG levels at 24 weeks: level 1, ≤ 5.6 mmol/L; level 2, > 5.6 to ≤ 6.1 mmol/L; and level 3, > 6.1 to ≤ 7.0 mmol/L.

Results

At week 24, 863 individuals with diabetes had available FPG data and 179, 122, and 179 individuals achieved FPG levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The proportion of individuals with HbA1c < 7% or HbA1c < 7% without hypoglycemia (≤ 3.9 or ≤ 3.0 mmol/L) was significantly higher in FPG levels 1 (p < 0.01) and 2 (p < 0.05) than in level 3. The least squares mean changes from baseline in HbA1c (− 1.77% and − 1.66% vs − 1.34%; both p < 0.001) and 2-h postprandial glucose (− 3.88 mmol/L and − 3.98 mmol/L vs − 3.22 mmol/L; both p < 0.05) were also significantly higher in FPG levels 1 and 2 compared with level 3. Linear regression analysis showed a moderate relationship between FPG and HbA1c levels at 24 weeks (r = 0.449).

Conclusions

Chinese individuals with T2D who achieved lower FPG levels with insulin glargine 100 IU/mL were more likely to achieve the recommended target HbA1c of < 7% compared with those with higher FPG levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02545842.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamagishi S, Imaizumi T. Diabetic vascular complications: pathophysiology, biochemical basis and potential therapeutic strategy. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11:2279–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zoungas S, Chalmers J, Ninomiya T, et al. Association of HbA1c levels with vascular complications and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of glycaemic thresholds. Diabetologia. 2012;55:636–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Riddle M, Umpierrez G, DiGenio A, Zhou R, Rosenstock J. Contributions of basal and postprandial hyperglycemia over a wide range of A1C levels before and after treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2508–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Owens DR, Traylor L, Dain M-P, Landgraf W. Efficacy and safety of basal insulin glargine 12 and 24 weeks after initiation in persons with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of data from treatment arms of 15 treat-to-target randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106:264–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Monnier L, Colette C, Owens D. Postprandial and basal glucose in type 2 diabetes: assessment and respective impacts. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(Suppl 1):S25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blonde L, Merilainen M, Karwe V, Raskin P, TITRATE Study Group. Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets - the TITRATE study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:623–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang W, Ma J, Yuan G, et al. Determining the optimal fasting glucose target for patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the multicentre, open-label, randomized-controlled FPG GOAL trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21:1973–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang W, Yang Z, Zhao J, Lu H, Luo T. Assessment of three fasting plasma glucose targets for insulin glargine-based therapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C. Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA1c. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:881–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schernthaner G, Guerci B, Gallwitz B, et al. Impact of postprandial and fasting glucose concentrations on HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36:389–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Woerle HJ, Neumann C, Zschau S, et al. Impact of fasting and postprandial glycemia on overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: importance of postprandial glycemia to achieve target HbA1c levels. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77:280–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yki-Järvinen H, Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Tiikkainen M, et al. Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study. Diabetologia. 2006;49:442–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramachandran A, Riddle MC, Kabali C, Gerstein HC. Relationship between A1C and fasting plasma glucose in dysglycemia or type 2 diabetes: an analysis of baseline data from the ORIGIN trial. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:749–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guan X, Zheng L, Sun G, et al. The changing relationship between HbA1c and FPG according to different FPG ranges. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39:523–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants included in the study.

Funding

This study and the journal's rapid service fee were funded by Sanofi.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Authorship Contributions

The study was designed by Wenying Yang, Jianhua Ma, and Minxiang Lei who were in charge of individual study centers, recruited patients, and conducted the study. Yunguang Li, Xia Zhang, and Nan Cui participated in study design and coordinated between study centers. All authors contributed to writing and reviewing the manuscript before submission. Wenying Yang is the guarantor for this manuscript.

Medical Writing and Editorial Assistance

The authors would like to thank Nishad Parkar, PhD, of inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare, for writing the outline and the subsequent drafts of this manuscript. This medical writing assistance was funded by Sanofi.

Disclosures

Wenying Yang has received honoraria for speakers’ bureau and advisory board participation from Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lily, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, and Servier and has also received investigator-initiated trial research grants from AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work. Jianhua Ma and Minxiang Lei have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Yunguang Li, Xia Zhang, and Nan Cui are employees of Sanofi China.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki and in line with the International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. An institutional review board at each site approved the study, and all participants gave written informed consent to participate. The study protocol and the informed consent to participate were reviewed and approved by China-Japan Friendship Hospital Ethics Committee.

Data Availability

Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of our trial participants. Further details on Sanofi’s data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenying Yang.

Additional information

Digital Features

To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12464729.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, J., Lei, M., Li, Y. et al. Influence of Fasting Glucose Levels on Achieving Glycemic Target in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: a Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther 37, 3816–3826 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01410-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01410-1

Keywords

Navigation