Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, et al. The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum Genet. 2017;136:665–77.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Bennett RL, French KS, Resta RG, Doyle DL. Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: update and assessment of the recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2008;17:424–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Chong JX, Buckingham KJ, Jhangiani SN, et al. The genetic basis of mendelian phenotypes: discoveries, challenges, and opportunities. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:199–215.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Saxena N, Taneja N, Shome P, Mani S. Mitochondrial donation: a boon or curse for the treatment of incurable mitochondrial diseases. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11:3–9.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson WP. Mechanisms leading to uniparental disomy and their clinical consequences. BioEssays. 2000;22:452–9.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Butler MG. Genomic imprinting disorders in humans: a mini-review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:477–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Ahn JW, Mann K, Walsh S, et al. Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance. Mol Cytogenet. 2010;3:9.
Article
Google Scholar
Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:528–33.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Manning M, Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med. 2010;12:742–5.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Bartnik M, Nowakowska B, Derwinska K, et al. Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in 256 patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability. J Appl Genet. 2014;55:125–44.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hay SB, Sahoo T, Travis MK, et al. ACOG and SMFM guidelines for prenatal diagnosis: is karyotyping really sufficient? Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:184–9.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Zarrei M, MacDonald JR, Merico D, Scherer SW. A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:172–83.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Wang J, Zhan H, Li FY, et al. Targeted array CGH as a valuable molecular diagnostic approach: experience in the diagnosis of mitochondrial and metabolic disorders. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;106:221–30.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hanemaaijer NM, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van der Vries G, et al. Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:161–5.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Nowakowska B. Clinical interpretation of copy number variants in the human genome. J Appl Genet. 2017;58:449–57.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Manolakos E, Vetro A, Kefalas K, et al. The use of array-CGH in a cohort of Greek children with developmental delay. Mol Cytogenet. 2010;3:22.
Article
Google Scholar
Siggberg L, Ala-Mello S, Jaakkola E, et al. Array CGH in molecular diagnosis of mental retardation—a study of 150 Finnish patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152a:1398–410.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5463–7.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Sun Y, Ruivenkamp CA, Hoffer MJ, et al. Next-generation diagnostics: gene panel, exome, or whole genome? Hum Mutat. 2015;36:648–55.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Sboner A, Mu XJ, Greenbaum D, Auerbach RK, Gerstein MB. The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think! Genome Biol. 2011;12:125.
Article
Google Scholar
Soliman NA. Orphan kidney diseases. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:c194–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sadowski CE, Lovric S, Ashraf S, et al. A single-gene cause in 295% of cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:1279–89.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ashton EJ, Legrand A, Benoit V, et al. Simultaneous sequencing of 37 genes identified causative mutations in the majority of children with renal tubulopathies. Kidney Int. 2018;93:961–7.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Bullich G, Domingo-Gallego A, Vargas I, et al. A kidney-disease gene panel allows a comprehensive genetic diagnosis of cystic and glomerular inherited kidney diseases. Kidney Int. 2018;94:363–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Groopman EE, Marasa M, Cameron-Christie S, et al. Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing for kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:142–51.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Mann N, Braun DA, Amann K, et al. Whole-exome sequencing enables a precision medicine approach for kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:201–15.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Matthijs G, Souche E, Alders M, et al. Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:2–5.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Clark MM, Stark Z, Farnaes L, et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic and clinical utility of genome and exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with suspected genetic diseases. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:16.
Article
Google Scholar
Liu P, Meng L, Normand EA, et al. Reanalysis of clinical exome sequencing data. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2478–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Lambert AS, Linglart A. Hypocalcaemic and hypophosphatemic rickets. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;32:455–76.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Razali NN, Hwu TT, Thilakavathy K. Phosphate homeostasis and genetic mutations of familial hypophosphatemic rickets. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28:1009–17.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Alizadeh Naderi AS, Reilly RF. Hereditary disorders of renal phosphate wasting. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:657–65.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Fuente R, Gil-Pena H, Claramunt-Taberner D, et al. X-linked hypophosphatemia and growth. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18:107–15.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Sabbagh Y, Jones AO, Tenenhouse HS. PHEXdb, a locus-specific database for mutations causing X-linked hypophosphatemia. Hum Mutat. 2000;16:1–6.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Morey M, Castro-Feijoo L, Barreiro J, et al. Genetic diagnosis of X-linked dominant Hypophosphatemic Rickets in a cohort study: tubular reabsorption of phosphate and 1,25(OH)2D serum levels are associated with PHEX mutation type. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:116.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Capelli S, Donghi V, Maruca K, et al. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity in a large series of patients with hypophosphatemic rickets. Bone. 2015;79:143–9.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ruppe M. X-Linked Hypophosphatemia. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2019. 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83985/. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.