Lack of adherence to medications is frequent in chronic diseases and has important implications with regard to health outcomes, including an increased risk for poor clinical outcomes, mortality, and greater health care costs [1,2,3]. As a high percentage of non-adherent patients are intentional, a strong belief in the necessity of the prescribed drug, outweighing potential concerns about side effects or long-term effects, is essential to increase adherence. In the recently published ALIGN study , Michetti et al. reported non-adherence rates to anti TNF-alpha drugs of approximately 20–40% based on the four-item Morisky Green questionnaire. Furthermore, they found an association between patient adherence and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) scores: in particular, higher BMQ-specific necessity score was associated with better adherence in the six immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) studied [i.e., rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis, Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis], whilst for the BMQ-specific concerns score an inverse association (higher BMQ-specific concerns score with poorer adherence) was found in patients with RA, AS, and PsA.
These results made us reflect about the need to optimize patient education, but also on how to improve the assessment of adherence to biological medications in particular, given the high economic impact related to IMID and their treatment with these drugs. Specifically we are very interested in research on how to measure adherence to subcutaneous (SC) biological medications—typically self-administered—and how to improve adherence. Moreover, the identification of patients with risk of becoming non-adherent over time is also essential to allow early implementation of preventive actions.
In the ALIGN study, the assessment of adherence to anti-TNF-alpha drugs was done using the four-item Morisky Green questionnaire. The Morisky Green test was developed and validated to measure non-adherence to oral medications and is widely used for this purpose ; however, is the Morisky Green test on its own an adequate tool to measure adherence to SC biological drugs? We recently published the results of a retrospective study on adherence to SC biological drugs in patients with RA, the ARCO study . In this study, we assessed adherence during the first 12–16 months of therapy after prescription of a new SC biological drug. Non-adherence was assessed by the Medication Possession Ratio, [MPR, (number of days actually covered by the medication administered by the patient/number of days of the study period to be covered by the medication prescribed) × 100], with non-adherence defined as MPR no greater than 80%. Hospital pharmacy registries were the source to calculate the number of days covered by the medication taken by each patient. In addition, investigators also inquired about adherence with the four-item Morisky Green questionnaire during the study visit, whose wording was adapted to focus on SC biological drugs.
The percentage of non-adherence according to the MPR was 14.3% (95% CI 11.1–18.3). The Morisky Green questionnaire classified 76.7% of patients as highly adherent and 23.3% as non-adherent to the SC biological medication (22.7% as moderately adherent, 0.6% as low adherent). Responses to each item of the Morisky Green questionnaire focused on the SC biological drug are displayed in Table 1. Although the percentage of agreement between the Morisky Green and the MPR in the classification of adherence was 73.3%, the kappa coefficient showed only a slight agreement (κ = 0.142), with low positive predictive value for non-adherence. Of note, 32 of 273 patients (11.7%) who were classified as highly adherent by the Morisky Green had been non-adherent according to the MPR, whilst 75.9% of those classed as moderately/low adherent by the Morisky Green were adherent according to the MPR. One limitation in our study is that the Morisky Green questionnaire was administered only once, at the study visit, and recall bias could have conditioned the results. On the other hand, the MPR allows the identification of non-adherent patients only retrospectively, which is also a limitation in clinical practice. The point we want to raise is that, although a useful tool, using only the Morisky Green questionnaire seems insufficient to correctly identify non-adherence to SC biological drugs, and complementary strategies are needed.
There have not been many studies assessing adherence to prescribed SC biological medications in patients with IMIDs. In general, these studies have relied on administrative databases, which do not take into account individual patients’ situations, such as periods of drug discontinuation due to adverse events or surgeries, or changes in the administration interval . Other studies have used the Morisky Green questionnaires [4, 8] or direct questions on the last dosage administered  to evaluate adherence to the SC medication.
The MPR, when it can be calculated thoroughly, like in our study, is a good measure of adherence to SC biological drugs, but with two limitations: first, and most important for clinical practice, the MPR allows only a retrospective assessment of adherence; it verifies lack of adherence when it happened, but is not valid for early detection of non-adherent patients, or for identifying patients at risk of non-adherence. For this purpose, inquiring about the patients frequently with direct questions that help us detect behaviors at risk for non-adherence (such as those in the Morisky Green questionnaire) is necessary, but because the Morisky Green does not detect non-adherence to SC biological drugs with the same precision as non-adherence to oral treatments (and the clinical implications can be different), a regular tracking of the medication taken or used by the patients is necessary. This will allow further investigation and early intervention if non-adherence is suspected. The second limitation is that although patients collect the SC medication from the pharmacy, it does not necessarily imply that they are administering the doses correctly or on the scheduled days. The MPR will not detect non-adherence in patients who inject their medication irregularly, providing they inject it within the time frame spanning from the collection of vials to the next collection from the pharmacy. When patients get their SC medications injected in health care institutions (either primary care or hospitals), it is easier to track medication use, but most patients self-inject the SC drug at home. In this situation, reminders or diaries in which patients can register the injection dates might be useful, although not 100% indicative of what patients have actually done . Monitoring drug levels has been proposed as a helpful tool to manage biological drugs, especially in patients with inflammatory bowel disease . Although not routinely, measuring drug levels could also help in making decisions in several circumstances, e.g., in certain patients with worsening disease and undetectable or very low drug levels, the possibility of non-adherence to medication should be explored before switching to another biological drug .
Whilst several interventions have proven efficacious for increasing adherence to short-term treatments, interventions for improving adherence to chronic therapies have been less successful . Thus, any effort to prevent patients from discontinuing adherence to biological drugs should be useful in the long term. From this perspective, the BMQ , with or without other tools or questionnaires, namely the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) , also used in the ALIGN study, might be useful as screening tool to identify those patients at higher risk of becoming non-adherent. Perhaps, a first instance to use the BMQ-general should be when a person becomes a chronic patient who will need continuous treatment over the years. At that moment, the BMQ could aid by highlighting the specific fears or behaviors that shape the patient profile, thus guiding the implementation of specific actions or educational activities. Regular use of the BMQ-specific and other questionnaires, especially when changes in the therapy are needed or side effects occur, could be useful to guide personalized efforts to reassure patients about their therapies.
In conclusion, assessing adherence to SC biological medication is a challenge, and it is likely to require information from several sources. A validated strategy to diagnose non-adherence to SC biological drugs is needed. The items on the Morisky Green questionnaire help in identifying patients with behaviors leading to poor adherence, but a thorough tracking of all the medication collected by patients is essential to address deviations. Moreover, measuring drug levels could also be useful when non-adherence is suspected but cannot be confirmed otherwise. Besides, the BMQ is a good tool to understand patients’ beliefs about medicines, and to aim to establish individual strategies targeted to strengthen beliefs in the necessity of therapy, and to reduce concerns, which will in turn reduce the risk of non-adherence to the prescribed medications. Studies to confirm this hypothesis are needed.
World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. 2003. http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
Simpson SH, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality. BMJ. 2006;333:15.
Rasmussen JN, Chong A, Alter DA. Relationship between adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;297:177–86.
Michetti P, Weinman J, Mrowietz U, et al. Impact of treatment-related beliefs on medication adherence in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: results of the global ALIGN study. Adv Ther. 2017;34:91–108.
Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986;24:67–74.
Calvo-Alén J, Monteagudo I, Salvador G, et al. Non-adherence to subcutaneous biological medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre, non-interventional study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;35:423–30.
Tkacz J, Ellis L, Bolge SC, Meyer R, Brady BL, Ruetsch C. Utilization and adherence patterns of subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Ther. 2014;36:737–47.
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Di Carlo M, Farah S, Gutierrez M. Adherence to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy administered subcutaneously and associated factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2015;21:419–25.
Bluett J, Morgan C, Thurston L, et al. Impact of inadequate adherence on response to subcutaneously administered anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs: results from the biologics in rheumatoid arthritis genetics and genomics study syndicate cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54:494–9.
Bruera S, Barbo AG, Lopez-Olivo MA. Use of medication reminders in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36:1543–8.
Silva-Ferreira F, Afonso J, Pinto-Lopes P, Magro F. A systematic review on infliximab and adalimumab drug monitoring: levels, clinical outcomes and assays. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:2289–301.
Jani M, Isaacs JD, Morgan AW, et al. High frequency of antidrug antibodies and association of random drug levels with efficacy in certolizumab pegol-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the BRAGGSS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:208–13.
Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD000011.
Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health. 1999;14:1–24.
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:631–7.
Merck Sharp & Dohme participated in the interpretation of the data and in the writing, review, and approval of the content of this letter. No funding was received for article processing charges. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.
Luis Cea-Calvo is a full time employee at Merck Sharp & Dohme of Spain. Loreto Carmona and Jaime Calvo-Alén have nothing to disclose.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This article does not contain any new studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
To view enhanced content for this article go to http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/B47AF06010950BB3.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Cea-Calvo, L., Carmona, L. & Calvo-Alén, J. The Challenge of Assessing Adherence to Subcutaneous Biological Drugs in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Letter to the Editor Regarding Michetti P, Weinman J, Mrowietz U, et al. Adv Ther (2017);34:91–108. doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0441-3. Adv Ther 34, 2173–2176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0602-z