Abstract
Introduction
Pitavastatin is a novel, potent, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. This study compared the long-term efficacy of pitavastatin and simvastatin in dyslipidemic patients at high risk of coronary heart disease.
Methods
A 44-week blinded extension study was conducted at 24 centers in five European countries for patients who had previously completed a 12-week randomized, double-blind core study in which they received pitavastatin 4 mg or simvastatin 40 mg once daily. Patients originally randomized to pitavastatin 4 mg continued at the same dose throughout the extension study (n=121). In simvastatin-treated patients (n=57), the dose was increased to 80 mg in five patients who had not attained the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) during the core study. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients attaining the NCEP and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C targets, and the NCEP target for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) at weeks 16 and 44.
Results
Of the 178 patients who entered the extension study, 156 patients (109 in the pitavastatin group, 47 in the simvastatin groups) completed the 44-week treatment period. At week 44, NCEP and EAS targets were attained by 81.7% and 84.2%, respectively, of pitavastatin-treated patients, and 75.4% and 73.7%, respectively, of simvastatin-treated patients. NCEP targets for non-HDL-C were achieved by 79.2% of pitavastatin-treated patients and 70.2% of simvastatin-treated patients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, but pitavastatin 4 mg was associated with a numerically lower incidence of discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (5.8% vs. 10.5% of patients) and a lower rate of myalgia (4.1% vs. 12.3%) compared with simvastatin 40–80 mg.
Conclusion
Pitavastatin 4 mg provides long-term efficacy similar to that of simvastatin 40–80 mg. Further studies should ascertain whether trends suggesting that pitavastatin may exhibit a more favorable long-term tolerability profile are statistically significant.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–1278.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497.
De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1601–1610.
Shepherd J. The statin era: in search of the ideal lipid regulating agent. Heart. 2001;85:259–264.
Phatak H, Wentworth C, Sazonov V, et al. Prevalence and predictors of lipid abnormalities in patients treated with statins in the UK general practice. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:225–233.
Ferrières J, Gousse ET, Fabry C, et al. Assessment of lipid-lowering treatment in France — the CEPHEUS study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;101:557–563.
García Ruiz FJ, Marín Ibáñez A, Pérez-Jiménez F, et al. Current lipid management and low cholesterol goal attainment in common daily practice in Spain. The REALITY Study. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(suppl. 3):1–12.
Hermans MP, Van Mieghem W, Vandenhoven G, et al. Centralized Pan-European survey on the undertreatment of hypercholesterolaemia (CEPHEUS). Acta Cardiol. 2009;64:177–185.
Saito Y, Yamada N, Teramoto T, et al. A randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin versus pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2002;162:373–379.
Kajinami K, Koizumi J, Ueda K, Miyamoto S, Takegoshi T, Mabuchi H. Effects of NK-104, a new hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme reductase inhibitor, on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Hokuriku NK-104 Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:178–183.
Noji Y, Higashikata T, Inazu A, et al. Long-term treatment with pitavastatin (NK-104), a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2002;163:157–164.
Hayashi T, Yokote K, Saito Y, et al. Pitavastatin: efficacy and safety in intensive lipid lowering. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8:2315–2327.
Sakaeda T, Fujino H, Komoto C, et al. Effects of acid and lactone forms of eight HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on CYP-mediated metabolism and MDR1-mediated transport. Pharm Res. 2006;23:506–512.
Eriksson M, Budinski D, Hounslow N. Comparative efficacy of pitavastatin and simvastatin in highrisk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or combined dyslipidemia: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Ther. 2011;In press.
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.
Nauck M, Warnick GR, Rifai N. Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem. 2002;48:236–254.
Levy D, Wilson WF. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an epidemiologic perspective. In: Topol EJ, ed. Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:13–29.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389.
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:7–22.
Ballantyne CM, Olsson AG, Cook TJ, Mercuri MF, Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J. Influence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated triglyceride on coronary heart disease events and response to simvastatin therapy in 4S. Circulation. 2001;104:3046–3051.
FDA Drug Safety Communication: Ongoing safety review of high-dose Zocor (simvastatin) and increased risk of muscle injury. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm204882.htm. Accessed December 7 2010.
Armitage J, Bowman L, Wallendszus K, et al. Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with 80 mg versus 20 mg simvastatin daily in 12,064 survivors of myocardial infarction: a double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1658–1669.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Eriksson, M., Budinski, D. & Hounslow, N. Long-term efficacy of pitavastatin versus simvastatin. Adv Therapy 28, 799–810 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-011-0057-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-011-0057-6