Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Go to cart
  1. Home
  2. Advances in Therapy
  3. Article
Importance of inhaler-device satisfaction in asthma treatment: Real-world observations of physician-observed compliance and clinical/patient-reported outcomes
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction with Budesonide/Formoterol Easyhaler® Among Patients with Asthma or COPD Switching from Previous Treatment: a Real-World Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes

29 July 2019

Gabriella Gálffy, Maria Szilasi & Lilla Tamási

The impact of moderate and severe asthma exacerbations on quality of life: a post hoc analysis of randomised controlled trial data

12 January 2021

Andrew Briggs, Shuaib Nasser, … J. Christian Virchow

Comparison of User Satisfaction and Preference with Inhalant Devices Between a Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler and Ellipta in Stable Asthma Patients: A Randomized, Crossover Study

02 March 2021

Hiroyuki Ohbayashi, Takamitsu Asano, … Mitsue Ariga

Impact of PIF, Inhalation Technique and Medication Adherence on Health Status and Exacerbations in COPD: Protocol of a Real-World Observational Study (PIFotal COPD Study)

17 September 2021

Marika Leving, Hans Wouters, … Janwillem Kocks

Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy and Health-Related Quality of Life in COPD: The IMPACT Study

09 July 2020

Maggie Tabberer, C. Elaine Jones, … David A. Lipson

Adherence and quality of life assessment in patients with asthma treatment with budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler device: the COMPLETE study

27 June 2022

Konstantinos P. Exarchos, Nikoletta Rovina, … Konstantinos Kostikas

Evaluating the Impact and Benefits of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol in Individuals with Asthma or COPD: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Patient Experiences

13 August 2018

Henrik Svedsater, Helen A. Doll, … Magdalena Vanya

Relationship between the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and other outcomes: a targeted literature review

03 April 2020

Bas C. P. van Dijk, Henrik Svedsater, … Cathelijne Alleman

How does the EQ-5D-5L perform in asthma patients compared with an asthma-specific quality of life questionnaire?

13 June 2020

Boglárka L. Szentes, Konrad Schultz, … Larissa Schwarzkopf

Download PDF
  • Original Research
  • Open Access
  • Published: 10 February 2011

Importance of inhaler-device satisfaction in asthma treatment: Real-world observations of physician-observed compliance and clinical/patient-reported outcomes

  • M. Small1,
  • P. Anderson1,
  • A. Vickers1,
  • S. Kay1 &
  • …
  • S. Fermer1 

Advances in Therapy volume 28, pages 202–212 (2011)Cite this article

  • 2759 Accesses

  • 82 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Introduction

It is hypothesized that health and patient-reported outcomes in asthma are positively influenced by the level of patient satisfaction with their inhaler device. This paper uses data from a real-world observational study to investigate the extent of the relationship between inhaler satisfaction and patient compliance, and the influence this has on health and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Respiratory Disease Specific Programme® (Adelphi, Macclesfield, UK), a cross-sectional study of consulting patients in five European countries undertaken between June and September 2009. A range of clinical and patient-reported outcomes were observed allowing analysis of these and their relationship with patient-reported inhaler satisfaction and patient compliance.

Results

The analysis demonstrates that for the majority of patients the higher the level of satisfaction that the patient reports for their device the more likely the patient is observed to be compliant and to experience better outcomes including quality of life (as measured by EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D] utility score, P<0.001), fewer exacerbations (P<0.001), fewer hospital visits (P=0.011), fewer healthcare visits (P=0.001), fewer primary care physician visits (P=0.001), and fewer sleep disturbances (P<0.001).

Conclusion

The level of patient satisfaction with their inhaler device is observed to have a positive influence on the treatment goals for asthma through its association with improved compliance.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  1. Braman S. The global burden of asthma. Chest. 2006;130:4S–12S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, et al. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) program: the global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee Report. Allergy. 2004;59: 469–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabe KF, Vermeire PA, Soriano JB, et al. Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the Asthma Insight and Reality in Europe (AIRE) study. Eur Resp J. 2000;16:802–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. GlaxoSmithKline. Asthma in America: a landmark survey. Available at: www.asthmainamerica.com. Accessed March 25, 2010.

  5. Adachi M, Morikawa A, Ishihara K. Asthma insights and reality in Japan (AIRJ). Arerugi. 2002;51: 411–420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai CK, De Guia TS, Kim YY, et al. Asthma control in the Asia-Pacific region: the Asthma Insights and Reality in Asia-Pacific Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:263–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Global Initiative for Asthma. GINA report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2009. Available at: www.ginasthma.org. Accessed: November 24, 2010.

  8. Horne R. Compliance, adherence and concordance. Implications for asthma treatment. Chest. 2006;130(Suppl. 1):65S–72S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ward M, Reynolds C. Patient empowerment: the key to compliance in asthma. Nursing Times. 2000;96:8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson P, Benford M, Harris N, et al. Realworld physician and patient behaviour across countries: disease-specific programmes — a means to understand. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24: 3063–3072.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins V, Kay S, Small M. Physician and patient survey of allergic rhinitis: methodology. Allergy. 2007;62:6–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Small M, Vickers A, Anderson P, Kay S. The patient-physician partnership in asthma: real-world observations associated with clinical and patientreported outcomes. Adv Ther. 2010;27:511–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. European Pharmaceutical Market Research Association Code of Conduct for International Healthcare Market Research. Available at: www.ephmra.org/professional-standards.aspx. Accessed September 10, 2010.

  14. Ley P, Llewellyn S. Improving patients’ understanding, recall, satisfaction and compliance. In: Broome, A, Llewellyn S, eds. Health Psychology: Process and Applications. 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall; 1995:75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins CD, Stanton BA, Niemcryk SJ, Rose RM. A scale for the estimation of sleep problems in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:313–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood S. Generalized Additive Models: an Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grömping U. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Soft. 2006;17:1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cochrane GM. Compliance in asthma: a European perspective. Eur Respir J. 1995;5:116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bourbeau J, Bartlett S J. Patient adherence in COPD. Thorax. 2008;63:831–838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adelphi Mill, Adelphi Real World, Grimshaw Lane, Macclesfield, SK10 5JB, UK

    M. Small, P. Anderson, A. Vickers, S. Kay & S. Fermer

Authors
  1. M. Small
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Vickers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Kay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Fermer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Anderson.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Small, M., Anderson, P., Vickers, A. et al. Importance of inhaler-device satisfaction in asthma treatment: Real-world observations of physician-observed compliance and clinical/patient-reported outcomes. Adv Therapy 28, 202–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-010-0108-4

Download citation

  • Received: 22 December 2010

  • Published: 10 February 2011

  • Issue Date: March 2011

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-010-0108-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • asthma
  • compliance
  • device
  • health outcomes
  • inhaler
  • patient-reported outcomes
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature