Skip to main content
Log in

Digital unterstützte Modelle in der Patientenbeobachtung

Beispiel einer psychoonkologischen App für Brust- und Darmkrebspatienten

Digitally assisted models for patient monitoring

Example of a psycho-oncological app for breast and colorectal cancer patients

  • Fokus
  • Published:
Forum Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Der digitalen Medizin wird ein hohes Potenzial zur Verbesserung der Patientenversorgung beigemessen. Die Studienlage dazu ist aktuell sehr unbefriedigend. Jedoch gewinnt die Nutzung digitaler Techniken in der psychoonkologischen Versorgung an Bedeutung.

Ziel der Arbeit

Der vorliegende Beitrag fasst Befunde zum Themenbereich „patient reported outcomes“ (PROs) zusammen und präsentiert Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie zur Nutzung einer psychoonkologischen App.

Material und Methoden

Bisher wurden 12 Patienten mit Brust- oder Darmkrebs in die Pilotstudie einbezogen. Sie füllten Fragebögen zur ihrer Person sowie zum Nutzungsverhalten aus.

Ergebnisse

Besonders ansprechend finden Patienten den täglichen Gesundheitscheck sowie die bereitgestellten Informationen und Tipps bezüglich der Erkrankung. Positiv wurde gesehen, dass erfasste Daten zum eigenen Gesundheitscheck oder zu krankheitsbezogenen Informationen in der Sprechstunde genutzt werden können. Hinsichtlich einer möglichen Optimierung der App wurden aus Patientensicht v. a. eine stärkere Anpassung bereitgestellter Informationen an die aktuelle Situation sowie direkte Hinweise auf neue Infos und Tipps genannt.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die psychoonkologische Gesundheits-App fand größtenteils positive Resonanz bei den Patienten. Nächste Schritte sind die (technische) Verbesserung bestimmter Funktionen, die Individualisierung der Informationen sowie eine Implementation und Evidenzprüfung im Rahmen einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Abstract

Background

Digital health is considered to have the potential to improve patient care. There are currently few studies verifying its benefits. However, the use of digital technology is gaining importance in psycho-oncological care.

Objectives

The current paper aims to summarize results on the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in an oncological setting and presents the results of a pilot study on the use of a psycho-oncological health app.

Material and methods

Up until now, 12 patients with a diagnosis of breast or colorectal cancer have been included. Patients answered questionnaires concerning personal information and usage behavior.

Results

Patients particularly appreciated the daily health check and the information and health care advice with regard to their illness. It was positively regarded that the data assessed via the daily health check and illness-related information could be used in the context of doctors’ appointments. Suggestions for optimization of the app from the patients’ point of view included adaptation of information to their current situation and direct references to new information and health care advice.

Conclusions

The psycho-oncological health app was mainly well received by patients. Technical improvement of certain functions, individualization of information, implementation and collection of evidence in a randomised controlled trial are the next steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Abrol E, Groszmann M, Pitman A et al (2017) Exploring the digital technology preferences of teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer and survivors: a cross-sectional service evaluation questionnaire. J Cancer Surviv 11:670–682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG et al (2016) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:557–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benze G, Nauck F, Alt-Epping B et al (2017) PROutine: a feasibility study assessing surveillance of electronic patient reported outcomes and adherence via smartphone app in advanced cancer. Ann Palliat Med. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2017.07.05

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertelsmann-Stiftung (2016) Gesundheits-Apps. In: SPOTLIGHT Gesundheit Nr. 2

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boogerd EA, Arts T, Engelen LJ et al (2015) “What is eHealth”: time for an update? JMIR Res Protoc 4:e29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Borosund E, Cvancarova M, Moore SM et al (2014) Comparing effects in regular practice of e‑communication and Web-based self-management support among breast cancer patients: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 16:e295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouma G, Admiraal JM, De Vries EG et al (2015) Internet-based support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 95:26–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dogan E, Sander C, Wagner X et al (2017) Smartphone-based monitoring of objective and subjective data in affective disorders: where are we and where are we going? Systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19:e262

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Egbring M, Far E, Roos M et al (2016) A mobile app to stabilize daily functional activity of breast cancer patients in collaboration with the physician: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Med Internet Res 18:e238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Falchook AD, Tracton G, Stravers L et al (2016) Use of mobile device technology to continuously collect patient-reported symptoms during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective feasibility study. Adv Radiat Oncol 1:115–121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Faller H, Weis J, Koch U et al (2016) Perceived need for psychosocial support depending on emotional distress and mental comorbidity in men and women with cancer. J Psychosom Res 81:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbert A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Davidson S et al (2015) Use of patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms and health related quality of life in the clinic. Gynecol Oncol 136:429–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorlick A, Bantum EO, Owen JE (2014) Internet-based interventions for cancer-related distress: exploring the experiences of those whose needs are not met. Psychooncology 23:452–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartung TJ, Brähler E, Faller H et al (2017) The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: Prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types. Eur J Cancer 72:46–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramer U, Vollmar HC (2017) Digital Health. Veränderung als Chance nutzen. Forum 32:470–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuhnt S, Brähler E, Faller H et al (2016) Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom 85:289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT (2009) Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Psychooncology 18:1129–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maguire R, Ream E, Richardson A et al (2015) Development of a novel remote patient monitoring system: the advanced symptom management system for radiotherapy to improve the symptom experience of patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 38:E37–E47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehnert A, Koch-Gromus U (2016) Handbuch Psychoonkologie. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Mooney KH, Beck SL, Friedman RH et al (2014) Automated monitoring of symptoms during ambulatory chemotherapy and oncology providers’ use of the information: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 22:2343–2350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mooney KH, Beck SL, Wong B et al (2017) Automated home monitoring and management of patient-reported symptoms during chemotherapy: results of the symptom care at home RCT. Cancer Med 6:537–546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nohl-Deryk P, Brinkmann JK, Gerlach FM et al (2018) Hürden bei der Digitalisierung der Medizin in Deutschland – eine Expertenbefragung. Gesundheitswesen. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ringwald J, Marwedel L, Junne F et al (2017) Demands and needs for psycho-oncological ehealth interventions in women with cancer: cross-sectional study. JMIR Cancer 3:e19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Strasser F, Blum D, Von Moos R et al (2016) The effect of real-time electronic monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and clinical syndromes in outpatient workflow of medical oncologists: E‑MOSAIC, a multicenter cluster-randomized phase III study (SAKK 95/06). Ann Oncol 27:324–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Der Vaart R, Drossaert C (2017) Development of the digital health literacy instrument: measuring a broad spectrum of health 1.0 and health 2.0 skills. J Med Internet Res 19:e27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner LI, Schink J, Bass M et al (2015) Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer 121:927–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yanez BR, Buitrago D, Buscemi J et al (2017) Study design and protocol for My Guide: an e‑health intervention to improve patient-centered outcomes among Hispanic breast cancer survivors. Contemp Clin Trials 65:61–68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Ernst.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Ernst und L. Broemer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Alle beschriebenen Untersuchungen am Menschen wurden mit Zustimmung der zuständigen Ethik-Kommission, im Einklang mit nationalem Recht sowie gemäß der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 (in der aktuellen, überarbeiteten Fassung) durchgeführt. Von allen beteiligten Patienten liegt eine Einverständniserklärung vor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ernst, J., Broemer, L. Digital unterstützte Modelle in der Patientenbeobachtung . Forum 33, 190–195 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12312-018-0414-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12312-018-0414-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation