Skip to main content
Log in

Lower Limb Antagonist Muscle Co-Activation and its Relationship with Gait Parameters in Cerebellar Ataxia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased antagonist muscle co-activation, seen in motor-impaired individuals, is an attempt by the neuromuscular system to provide mechanical stability by stiffening joints. The aim of this study was to investigate the co-activation pattern of the antagonist muscles of the ankle and knee joints during walking in patients with cerebellar ataxia, a neurological disease that strongly affects stability. Kinematic and electromyographic parameters of gait were recorded in 17 patients and 17 controls. Ankle and knee antagonist muscle co-activation indexes were measured throughout the gait cycle and during the sub-phases of gait. The indexes of ataxic patients were compared with those of controls and correlated with clinical and gait variables. Patients showed increased co-activity indexes of both ankle and knee muscles during the gait cycle as well as during the gait sub-phases. Both knee and ankle muscle co-activation indexes were positively correlated with disease severity, while ankle muscle co-activation was also positively correlated with stance and swing duration variability. Significant negative correlations were observed between the number of self-reported falls per year and knee muscle co-activation. The increased co-activation observed in these cerebellar ataxia patients may represent a compensatory strategy serving to reduce gait instability. Indeed, this mechanism allows patients to reduce the occurrence of falls. The need for this strategy, which results in excessive muscle co-contraction, increased metabolic costs and cartilage degeneration processes, could conceivably be overcome through the use of supportive braces specially designed to provide greater joint stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patten C, Kamen G. Adaptations in motor unit discharge activity with force control training in young and older human adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;83:128–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons RW, Richardson C. Peripheral regulation of stiffness during arm movements by coactivation of the antagonist muscles. Brain Res. 1988;473:134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirokawa S, Solomonow M, Luo Z, Lu Y, D’Ambrosia R. Muscular co-contraction and control of knee stability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 1991;1:199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmitz A, Silder A, Heiderscheit B, Mahoney J, Thelen DG. Differences in lower-extremity muscular activation during walking between healthy older and young adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 2009;19:1085–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson DS, Martin PE. Effects of age and walking speed on coactivation and cost of walking in healthy adults. Gait Posture. 2010;31:355–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falconer K, Winter DA. Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;25:135–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffin TM, Guilak F. The role of mechanical loading in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hortobágyi T, Solnik S, Gruber A, Rider P, Steinweg K, Helseth J, et al. Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation. Gait Posture. 2009;29:558–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamontagne A, Richards CL, Malouin F. Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 2000;10:407–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow JW, Yablon SA, Stokic DS. Coactivation of ankle muscles during stance phase of gait in patients with lower limb hypertonia after acquired brain injury. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:1599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fallah-Yakhdani HR, Abbasi-Bafghi H, Meijer OG, Bruijn SM, van den Dikkenberg N, Benedetti M-G, et al. Determinants of co-contraction during walking before and after arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon. 2012;27:485–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz V, Zijlstra W, Prokop T, Berger W. Leg muscle activation during gait in Parkinson’s disease: adaptation and interlimb coordination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:408–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meunier S, Pol S, Houeto JL, Vidailhet M. Abnormal reciprocal inhibition between antagonist muscles in Parkinson’s disease. Brain J Neurol. 2000;123(Pt 5):1017–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palliyath S, Hallett M, Thomas SL, Lebiedowska MK. Gait in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc. 1998;13:958–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolze H, Klebe S, Petersen G, Raethjen J, Wenzelburger R, Witt K, et al. Typical features of cerebellar ataxic gait. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:310–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neurosci Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry. 2004;10:247–59.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Serrao M, Pierelli F, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Conte C, Don R, et al. Gait pattern in inherited cerebellar ataxias. Cerebellum Lond Engl. 2012;11:194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barak Y, Wagenaar RC, Holt KG. Gait characteristics of elderly people with a history of falls: a dynamic approach. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1501–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Earhart GM, Bastian AJ. Selection and coordination of human locomotor forms following cerebellar damage. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:759–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M, Currier RD, Subramony SH, Wessel K, et al. International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. The Ataxia Neuropharmacology Committee of the World Federation of Neurology. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145:205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Relative contributions of balance and voluntary leg-coordination deficits to cerebellar gait ataxia. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:1844–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis III RB, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 1991;10:575–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Winter DA. Biomechanics of human movement. Hoboken: Wiley; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hermens H. European recommendations for surface electromyography: results of the SENIAM Project (SENIAM) [Internet]. Roessingh Research and Development; [citato 20 giugno 2013]. Recuperato da: http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/9075452152/citeulike00-21

  25. Barbero M, Merletti R, Rainoldi A. Atlas of muscle innervation zones: understanding surface electromyography and its applications. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Burden AM, Trew M, Baltzopoulos V. Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 2003;13:519–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rudolph KS, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Dynamic stability after ACL injury: who can hop? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2000;8:262–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Don R, Ranavolo A, Cacchio A, Serrao M, Costabile F, Iachelli M, et al. Relationship between recovery of calf-muscle biomechanical properties and gait pattern following surgery for achilles tendon rupture. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon. 2007;22:211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Labini FS, Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Gravano S, Lacquaniti F. Smooth changes in the EMG patterns during gait transitions under body weight unloading. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1525–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gorassini MA, Norton JA, Nevett-Duchcherer J, Roy FD, Yang JF. Changes in locomotor muscle activity after treadmill training in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101:969–79.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher NI. Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berens P. CircStat: A MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics. J. Stat. Softw. 31.

  33. Mitoma H, Hayashi R, Yanagisawa N, Tsukagoshi H. Characteristics of Parkinsonian and ataxic gaits: a study using surface electromyograms, angular displacements and floor reaction forces. J Neurol Sci. 2000;174:22–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB, Bird AR. Reliability of lower limb electromyography during overground walking: a comparison of maximal- and sub-maximal normalisation techniques. J Biomech. 2010;43:749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariano Serrao.

Additional information

Silvia Mari and Mariano Serrao are equal contributors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mari, S., Serrao, M., Casali, C. et al. Lower Limb Antagonist Muscle Co-Activation and its Relationship with Gait Parameters in Cerebellar Ataxia. Cerebellum 13, 226–236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0533-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0533-4

Keywords

Navigation