Abstract
Increased antagonist muscle co-activation, seen in motor-impaired individuals, is an attempt by the neuromuscular system to provide mechanical stability by stiffening joints. The aim of this study was to investigate the co-activation pattern of the antagonist muscles of the ankle and knee joints during walking in patients with cerebellar ataxia, a neurological disease that strongly affects stability. Kinematic and electromyographic parameters of gait were recorded in 17 patients and 17 controls. Ankle and knee antagonist muscle co-activation indexes were measured throughout the gait cycle and during the sub-phases of gait. The indexes of ataxic patients were compared with those of controls and correlated with clinical and gait variables. Patients showed increased co-activity indexes of both ankle and knee muscles during the gait cycle as well as during the gait sub-phases. Both knee and ankle muscle co-activation indexes were positively correlated with disease severity, while ankle muscle co-activation was also positively correlated with stance and swing duration variability. Significant negative correlations were observed between the number of self-reported falls per year and knee muscle co-activation. The increased co-activation observed in these cerebellar ataxia patients may represent a compensatory strategy serving to reduce gait instability. Indeed, this mechanism allows patients to reduce the occurrence of falls. The need for this strategy, which results in excessive muscle co-contraction, increased metabolic costs and cartilage degeneration processes, could conceivably be overcome through the use of supportive braces specially designed to provide greater joint stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Patten C, Kamen G. Adaptations in motor unit discharge activity with force control training in young and older human adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;83:128–43.
Simmons RW, Richardson C. Peripheral regulation of stiffness during arm movements by coactivation of the antagonist muscles. Brain Res. 1988;473:134–40.
Hirokawa S, Solomonow M, Luo Z, Lu Y, D’Ambrosia R. Muscular co-contraction and control of knee stability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 1991;1:199–208.
Schmitz A, Silder A, Heiderscheit B, Mahoney J, Thelen DG. Differences in lower-extremity muscular activation during walking between healthy older and young adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 2009;19:1085–91.
Peterson DS, Martin PE. Effects of age and walking speed on coactivation and cost of walking in healthy adults. Gait Posture. 2010;31:355–9.
Falconer K, Winter DA. Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;25:135–49.
Griffin TM, Guilak F. The role of mechanical loading in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33:195–200.
Hortobágyi T, Solnik S, Gruber A, Rider P, Steinweg K, Helseth J, et al. Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation. Gait Posture. 2009;29:558–64.
Lamontagne A, Richards CL, Malouin F. Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 2000;10:407–15.
Chow JW, Yablon SA, Stokic DS. Coactivation of ankle muscles during stance phase of gait in patients with lower limb hypertonia after acquired brain injury. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:1599–605.
Fallah-Yakhdani HR, Abbasi-Bafghi H, Meijer OG, Bruijn SM, van den Dikkenberg N, Benedetti M-G, et al. Determinants of co-contraction during walking before and after arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon. 2012;27:485–94.
Dietz V, Zijlstra W, Prokop T, Berger W. Leg muscle activation during gait in Parkinson’s disease: adaptation and interlimb coordination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:408–15.
Meunier S, Pol S, Houeto JL, Vidailhet M. Abnormal reciprocal inhibition between antagonist muscles in Parkinson’s disease. Brain J Neurol. 2000;123(Pt 5):1017–26.
Palliyath S, Hallett M, Thomas SL, Lebiedowska MK. Gait in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc. 1998;13:958–64.
Stolze H, Klebe S, Petersen G, Raethjen J, Wenzelburger R, Witt K, et al. Typical features of cerebellar ataxic gait. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:310–2.
Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neurosci Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry. 2004;10:247–59.
Serrao M, Pierelli F, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Conte C, Don R, et al. Gait pattern in inherited cerebellar ataxias. Cerebellum Lond Engl. 2012;11:194–211.
Barak Y, Wagenaar RC, Holt KG. Gait characteristics of elderly people with a history of falls: a dynamic approach. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1501–10.
Earhart GM, Bastian AJ. Selection and coordination of human locomotor forms following cerebellar damage. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:759–69.
Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M, Currier RD, Subramony SH, Wessel K, et al. International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. The Ataxia Neuropharmacology Committee of the World Federation of Neurology. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145:205–11.
Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Relative contributions of balance and voluntary leg-coordination deficits to cerebellar gait ataxia. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:1844–56.
Davis III RB, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 1991;10:575–87.
Winter DA. Biomechanics of human movement. Hoboken: Wiley; 1979.
Hermens H. European recommendations for surface electromyography: results of the SENIAM Project (SENIAM) [Internet]. Roessingh Research and Development; [citato 20 giugno 2013]. Recuperato da: http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/9075452152/citeulike00-21
Barbero M, Merletti R, Rainoldi A. Atlas of muscle innervation zones: understanding surface electromyography and its applications. New York: Springer; 2012.
Burden AM, Trew M, Baltzopoulos V. Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. J Electromyogr Kinesiol Off J Int Soc Electrophysiol Kinesiol. 2003;13:519–32.
Rudolph KS, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Dynamic stability after ACL injury: who can hop? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2000;8:262–9.
Don R, Ranavolo A, Cacchio A, Serrao M, Costabile F, Iachelli M, et al. Relationship between recovery of calf-muscle biomechanical properties and gait pattern following surgery for achilles tendon rupture. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon. 2007;22:211–20.
Labini FS, Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Gravano S, Lacquaniti F. Smooth changes in the EMG patterns during gait transitions under body weight unloading. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1525–36.
Gorassini MA, Norton JA, Nevett-Duchcherer J, Roy FD, Yang JF. Changes in locomotor muscle activity after treadmill training in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101:969–79.
Fisher NI. Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
Berens P. CircStat: A MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics. J. Stat. Softw. 31.
Mitoma H, Hayashi R, Yanagisawa N, Tsukagoshi H. Characteristics of Parkinsonian and ataxic gaits: a study using surface electromyograms, angular displacements and floor reaction forces. J Neurol Sci. 2000;174:22–39.
Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB, Bird AR. Reliability of lower limb electromyography during overground walking: a comparison of maximal- and sub-maximal normalisation techniques. J Biomech. 2010;43:749–56.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Silvia Mari and Mariano Serrao are equal contributors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mari, S., Serrao, M., Casali, C. et al. Lower Limb Antagonist Muscle Co-Activation and its Relationship with Gait Parameters in Cerebellar Ataxia. Cerebellum 13, 226–236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0533-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0533-4