Skip to main content

Outcomes of ketorolac versus depomedrol infiltrations for subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY volume 106, pages 29–34 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Local subacromial infiltration with steroids is a common method of treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. However, the use of steroids has concerns like tendon rupture, articular cartilage changes and infections. Local NSAIDs infiltration has recently been tried in literature. This study compares the effect of subacromial injections of ketorolac with steroids.

Methods

A randomized controlled study was planned with 35 patients in each group. Patients in group-1 were infiltrated with subacromial ketorolac (60 mg with 2% lignocaine) and in group-2 with a steroid (methylprednisolone-40 mg with 2% lignocaine). A similar rehabilitation protocol was followed, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and shoulder pain and disability score (SPADI) and range of motion at one-month and three-months follow-up.

Results

Total data of 67 patients were analyzed, as three patients were lost to follow-up. In group 1, mean VAS improved from 7.9 \(\pm\) 0.95 to 3.19 \(\pm\) 0.81 (p < 0.001) and SPADI improved from 61.41 \(\pm\) 11.86 to 28.91 \(\pm\) 9.06 (p < 0.001) at three months, respectively. In group 2, mean VAS improved from 8.05 \(\pm\) 0.94 to 2.9 \(\pm\) 0.64 (p < 0.001) and SPADI improved from 63.45 \(\pm\) 9.64 to 25.32 \(\pm\) 6.87 (p < 0.001) at three months, respectively. However, there were no differences in functional outcomes between the groups (p = 0.21 for VAS, p = 0.16 for SPADI).

Conclusion

Subacromial ketorolac infiltration has an equivalent outcome as that of steroid infiltration. Ketorolac could be considered as a reasonable alternative to steroids in cases where it is contraindicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Alvarez CM, Litchfield R, Jackowski D, Griffin S, Kirkley A (2005) A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing subacromial injection of betamethasone and xylocaine to xylocaine alone in chronic rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med 33(2):255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM (1995) Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 54(12):959–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adebajo AO, Nash P, Hazleman BL (1990) A prospective double blind dummy placebo controlled study comparing triamcinolone hexacetonide injection with oral diclofenac 50 mg TDS in patients with rotator cuff tendinitis. J Rheumatol 17(9):1207–1210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrison DS, Frogameni AD, Woodworth P (1997) Non-operative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. JBJS 79(5):732–737

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garvey KD, Solberg MJ, Cai A, Matzkin EG (2018) Efficacy of corticosteroid injection for subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Joint 3(7)

  6. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM (2003) Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brinks A, Koes BW, Volkers AC, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM (2010) Adverse effects of extra-articular corticosteroid injections: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11(1):206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park SK, Choi YS, Kim HJ (2013) Hypopigmentation and subcutaneous fat, muscle atrophy after local corticosteroid injection. Korean J Anesthesiol 65(6 Suppl):S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halpern AA, Horowitz BG, Nagel DA (1977) Tendon ruptures associated with corticosteroid therapy. West J Med 127(5):378

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Taheri P, Dehghan F, Mousavi S, Solouki R (2017) Comparison of subacromial ketorolac injection versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. J Res Pharm Pract 1(6):223

    Google Scholar 

  11. van der Sande R, Rinkel WD, Gebremariam L, Hay EM, Koes BW, Huisstede BM (2013) Subacromial impingement syndrome: effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid, or other injections: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(5):961–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Devereaux M, Velanoski KQ, Pennings A, Elmaraghy A (2016) Short-term effectiveness of precut kinesiology tape versus an nsaid as adjuvant treatment to exercise for subacromial impingement: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Sport Med 26(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diercks R, Bron C, Dorrestijn O, Meskers C, Naber R, de Ruiter T et al (2014) Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain syndrome. Acta Orthop 85(3):314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suresh K (2011) An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci 4(1):8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chae J, Jedlicka L (2009) Subacromial corticosteroid injection for poststroke shoulder pain: an exploratory prospective case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(3):501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickens VA, Williams JL, Bhamra MS (2005) Role of physiotherapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective study. Physiotherapy 91(3):159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goyal T, Singh A, Negi P, Kharkwal B (2019) Comparative functional outcomes of patients with adhesive capsulitis receiving intra-articular versus sub-acromial steroid injections: case-control study. Musculoskelet Surg 103(1):31–35

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizk TE, Pinals RS, Talaiver AS (1991) Corticosteroid injections in adhesive capsulitis: investigation of their value and site. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72(1):20–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorrestijn O, Stevens M, Winters JC, van der Meer K, Diercks RL (2009) Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(4):652–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiggins ME, Fadale PD, Ehrlich MG, Walsh WR (1995) Effects of local injection of corticosteroids on the healing of ligaments. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(11):1682–1691

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hawkins RJ, Hobeika PE (1983) Impingement syndrome in the athletic shoulder. Clin Sports Med 2(2):391–405

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd JM (2003) Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004016

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watson M (1989) Rotator cuff function in the impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(3):361–366

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wernecke C, Braun HJ, Dragoo JL (2015) The effect of intra-articular corticosteroids on articular cartilage: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 3(5):2325967115581163

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hiemstra LA, Macdonald PB, Froese W (2003) Subacromial infection following corticosteroid injection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12(1):91–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blonna D, Bonasia DE, Mattei L, Bellato E, Greco V, Rossi R (2018) Efficacy and safety of subacromial corticosteroid injection in type 2 diabetic patients. Pain Res Treat 2018:9279343

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jean YH, Wen ZH, Chang YC, Hsieh SP, Tang CC, Wang YH, Wong CS (2007) Intra-articular injection of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor parecoxib attenuates osteoarthritis progression in anterior cruciate ligament-transected knee in rats: role of excitatory amino acids. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(6):638–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozyuvaci H, Bilgic B, Ozyuvaci E, Altan A, Altug T, Karaca C (2004) Intra-articular injection of tenoxicam in rats: assessment of the local effects on the articular cartilage and synovium. J Int Med Res 32(3):312–316

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karthikeyan S, Kwong HT, Upadhyay PK, Parsons N, Drew SJ, Griffin D (2010) A double-blind randomised controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 92(1):77–82

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Çift H, Özkan FÜ, Tolu S, Şeker A, Mahiroğulları M (2015) Comparison of subacromial tenoxicam and steroid injections in the treatment of impingement syndrome. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 26(1):16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aksakal M, Ermutlu C, Özkaya G, Özkan Y (2017) Lornoxicam injection is inferior to betamethasone in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. Der Orthopäde 46(2):179–185

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED (2013) A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(5):595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, AIIMS, Virbhadra Marg, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249201, India

    T. Goyal, S. Paul, S. S. Sethy & A. K. Choudhury

Authors
  1. T. Goyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. S. Sethy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. K. Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. S. Sethy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was taken from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goyal, T., Paul, S., Sethy, S.S. et al. Outcomes of ketorolac versus depomedrol infiltrations for subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Surg 106, 29–34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00667-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00667-7

Keywords

  • Shoulder pain
  • Subacromial impingement
  • Subacromial injection
  • Steroid injections
  • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Ketorolac