Abstract
Background
Staple sutures have already been proven as a good alternative to nylon sutures for wound closure in hip and knee surgeries. One such advantage to using staple sutures is the significant decrease in surgical time. In foot surgeries, staple sutures are still considered critical and are only used sporadically.
Objective
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare nylon sutures and skin staples for wound closure in foot and ankle surgeries with respect to complications and patient satisfaction.
Methods
A total of 61 patients underwent different operations in the fore-, mid-, and hindfoot areas, which were performed by a single surgeon. Twenty-nine patients received staple wound closures, while 32 patients received nylon suture closures using the Donati back-and-forth technique. Incision length, surgery time, in-patient stay, and wound complications were recorded. Furthermore, a patient survey using the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) for subjective pain and cosmetic results at the time of stitch removal (14 days) and after a 6-week follow-up was conducted.
Results
A significant between-group difference was found for surgery time (p = .041) and VNRS for pain (p < .001), with better results seen for staple sutures. Four patients with staple sutures and five with nylon sutures experienced wound dehiscence 14 days postoperatively. However, all patients had completely healed wounds at their 6-week follow-up. No revisional surgeries were necessary.
Conclusion
The present results indicate that a skin staple wound closure is a considerable alternative to the nylon suture closure in foot and ankle surgeries. Nevertheless, further prospective randomized trials must cement these insights.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Patel RM, Cayo M, Patel A, Albarillo M, Puri L (2012) Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure. Orthopedics 35:e641–e646
Livesey C, Wylde V, Descamps S, Descamps S, Estela CM, Bannister GC, Learmonth ID, Blom AW (2009) Skin closure after total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial of skin adhesive versus surgical staples. J Bone Joint Surg 91-B:725–729
Vince KG, Abdeen A (2006) Wound problems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:88–90
Shetty AA, Kumar VS, Morgan-Hough C et al (2004) Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: a prospective randomised trial. J Orthop Surg 12:191–193
Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, Donell S (2010) Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ 340:c1199
Graham DA, Jeffery JA, Bain D, Davies P, Bentley G (2000) Staple vs. subcuticular vicryl skin closure in knee replacement surgery: a spectrophotographic assessment of wound characteristics. Knee 7:239–243
Edlich RF, Becker DG, Thacker JG, Rodeheaver GT (1990) Scientific basis for selecting staple and tape skin closures. Clin Plast Surg 17:571–578
Shantz JA, Vernon J, Leiter J, Morshed S, Stranges G (2012) Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:89
Hlubek R, Walder P, Kánˇa J, Salounová D (2014) Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 81:233–237
Yuenyongviwat V, Iamthanaporn K, Hongnaparak T, Tangtrakulwanich B (2016) A randomised controlled trial comparing skin closure in total knee arthroplasty in the same knee: nylon sutures versus skin staples. Bone Joint Res 5:185–190
Khan RJ, Fick D, Yao F, Tang K, Hurworth M, Nivbrant B, Wood D (2006) A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Bone Joint Surg Br 88:238–242
Gohiya A, Gupta DC, Gaur S (2015) Comparative study of outcome of two methods (sutures vs staples) of skin closure in orthopedic surgery. Int J Med Res Rev 3:16–22
Lehtonen E, Patel H, Phillips S, Correia Pinto M, Naranje S, Shah A (2018) Staple versus suture closure for ankle fracture fixation: retrospective chart review for safety and outcomes. Foot (Edinb) 37:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2018.08.003
Shantz JA, Vernon J, Morshed S, Leiter J, Stranges G (2013) Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Patient Saf Surg 7:6
Uçkay I, Agostinho A, Belaieff W, Toutous-Trellu L, Scherer-Pietramaggiori S, Andres A (2011) Noninfectious wound complications in clean surgery: epidemiology, risk factors, and association with ntibiotic use. World J Surg 35:973–980
Singh B, Mowbray M, Nunn G, Mearns S (2006) Closure of hip wound, clips or subcuticular sutures: does it make a difference? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 16:124–129
Murphy M, Prendergast P, Rice J (2004) Comparison of clips versus sutures in orthopaedic wound closure. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 14:16–18
Clayer M, Southwood RT (1991) Comparative study of skin closure in hip surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 61:363–365
Rammelt S (2015) Foot and ankle surgery. Schattauer, Stuttgart
Stockley I, Elson RA (1987) Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:76–78
Waeschle RM, Hinz J, Bleeker F, Sliwa B, Popov A, Schmidt CE, Bauer M (2016) OR minute myth: guidelines for calculation of DRG revenues per OR minute. Anaesthesist 65:137–147
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniilidis, K., Stukenborg-Colsman, C., Ettinger, S. et al. Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?. Musculoskelet Surg 104, 163–169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00605-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00605-2