Abstract
Purpose
This is a prospective case–control study comparing short- and medium-term outcomes between sub-acromial and gleno-humeral corticosteroid injections in adhesive capsulitis.
Methods
The study population consisted of 105 patients (33 males, 72 females; mean age, 56.1 years). They were divided into three groups: (1) patients receiving 40 mg of methylprednisolone acetate as intra-articular injection (n = 35) followed by physical therapy; (2) patients receiving 40 mg of methylprednisolone acetate as sub-acromial injection (n = 35) followed by physical therapy; (3) patients receiving only physical therapy (heat, passive stretching exercises and wall climbing) and no injections (n = 35). Functional outcome scores (Constant shoulder score and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index), visual analogue scale for pain and range of motion of shoulder joint were noted at 3, 6 and 12 weeks and 6 months.
Results
There was a statistically significant improvement in VAS scores in group 1 and 2 at 3, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months compared to that before the injections. There was no statistically significant improvement in the group 3 at 3 and 6 weeks, but improvement was noticed at 12 weeks and 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS, CS score, SPADI and ROM between groups 1 and 2 at 3, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months. These scores were significantly better in group 1 and 2 compared to group 3 at 3, 6, 12, weeks and 6 months.
Conclusions
Corticosteroid injections into the sub-acromial space and into the gleno-humeral joint produce similar results in terms of pain relief and improvement in function in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Lundberg BJ (1969) The frozen shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand 119:1–59
Hong JY, Yoon SH, Moon DJ, Kwack KS, Joen B, Lee HY (2011) Comparison of high- and low-dose corticosteroid in subacromial injection for periarticular shoulder disorder: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92:1951–1960
Buchbinder R, Green S, Youd J (2003) Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 89:CD004016
Bloom JE, Rischin A, Johnston RV, Buchbinder R (2012) Image-guided versus blind glucocorticoid injection for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(8):CD009147
Sethi PM, Kingston S, Elattrache N (2005) Accuracy of anterior intraarticular injection of the glenohumeral joint. Arthroscopy 21:77–80
Oh JH, Oh CH, Choi JA, Kim SH, Kim JH, Yoon JP (2011) Comparison of glenohumeral and subacromial steroid injection in primary frozen shoulder: a prospective, randomized short-term comparison study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:1034–1040
Rizk TE, Pinals RS, Talaiver AS (1991) Corticosteroid injections in adhesive capsulitis: investigation of their value and site. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:20–22
Shin SJ, Lee SY (2013) Efficacies of corticosteroid injection at different sites of the shoulder for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(4):521–527
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158
Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD (2009) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: dimensions of the rotator interval measured with magnetic resonance arthrography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:437–442
Neer CS, Satterlee CC, Dalsey RM, Flatow EL (1992) The anatomy and potential effects of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 280:182–185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goyal, T., Singh, A., Negi, P. et al. Comparative functional outcomes of patients with adhesive capsulitis receiving intra-articular versus sub-acromial steroid injections: case–control study. Musculoskelet Surg 103, 31–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0538-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0538-8