Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty

Clinical results and functional outcome on retrospective series of patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results and related complications of four different surgical treatments of complex proximal humeral fractures according to their classification and features of patients.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2011, 92 consecutive patients with diagnosis of three–four-part displaced fractures, fractures with head dislocation and head-splitting fractures were evaluated postoperatively with Constant–Murley score, disability of arm, shoulder and hand score and simple shoulder test.

Results

All the treatment modalities showed from optimal to good mean functional results. The statistical analysis comparing each treatment group showed better outcomes scores (p < 0.05) for: locked plating versus HA, locked plating versus RSA and RSA versus HA. No differences between postoperative range of motion, complication rate and overall revision rate of the treatment groups were found at the end of follow-up (p > 0.05). Overall complication rate of surgical treatment of complex PHF was 31.5% (29 patients) with overall revision rate of 14.1%. Among patients with complications 77.8% of HA (7 of 9) required revision surgery (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The treatment of complex PHF is nowadays a challenge even for skilled shoulder surgeons. The several viable operative options give good results whenever used for the correct indication. The range of reported complications from 18.2 to 37.5% remains concerning, but most of them did not affect clinical outcome in this series. Accurate preoperative characterization of the fracture pattern is necessary, and high surgical skills of the different operative techniques, including arthroplasty, are recommended to meet the increased functional expectations of patients.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xie L, Ding F, Zhao Z, Chen Y, Xing D (2015) Operative versus non-operative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Springerplus 4:728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Song JQ, Deng XF, Wang YM, Wang XB, Li X, Yu B (2015) Operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a current meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 49(4):345–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Handoll HH, Brorson S (2015) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD000434

    Google Scholar 

  4. Launonen AP, Lepola V, Flinkkilä T, Laitinen M, Paavola M, Malmivaara A (2015) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a systemic review of 409 patients. Acta Orthop 86(3):280–285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zyto K (1998) Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Injury 29(5):349–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoellen IP, Bauer G, Holbein O (1997) Prosthetic humeral head replacement in dislocated humerus multi-fragment fracture in the elderly-an alternative to minimal osteosynthesis? Zent Chir 122(11):994–1001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stableforth PG (1984) Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66(1):104–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N (2001) Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults—a systematic review of management. Injury 32:363–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ (2008) Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17(1):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ, Rollins KE (2012) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD000434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Felli L, Biglieni L, Fiore M, Coviello M, Borri R, Cutolo M (2012) Functional study of glenohumeral ligaments. J Orthop Sci 17(5):634–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Neer CS II (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kapandji A (1989) Osteosynthesis using the “palm-tree” nail technique in fractures of the surgical neck of the humerus. Ann Chir Main 8(1):39–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamineni S, Ankem H, Sanghavi S (2004) Anatomical considerations for percutaneous proximal humeral fracture fixation. Injury 35(11):1133–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matassi F, Angeloni R, Carulli C, Civinini R, Di Bella L, Redl B, Innocenti M (2012) Locking plate and fibular allograft augmentation in unstable fractures of proximal humerus Locking plate and fibular allograft augmentation in unstable fractures of proximal humerus. Injury 43(11):1939–1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cofield RH (1988) Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, Feeley BT (2011) A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 42:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Frich LH, Olsen BS, Hrobjartsson A (2012) Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Injury 43:999–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jobin CM, Galatz LM (2012) Proximal humerus fractures: pin, plate, or replace? Semin Arthroplast 23:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tepass A, Rolauffs B, Weise K, Bahrs SD, Dietz K, Bahrs C (2013) Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review from 1970 to 2009. Patient Saf Surg 7(1):34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Abrams GD, Bruce B, McCormick F et al (2015) Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures-a systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients. J Orthop Trauma 29(1):54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cerruti P, Mangano T, Giovale M, Repetto I (2016) Early asymptomatic intrathoracic migration of a threaded pin after proximal humeral osteosynthesis. Int J Shoulder Surg 10(1):41–43. doi:10.4103/0973-6042.174520

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vallier HA (2007) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21(7):469–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Korkmaz MF, Aksu N, Göğüş A, Debre M, Kara AN, Işiklar ZU (2008) The results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS locking plate. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 42(2):97–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aguado HJ, Mingo J, Torres M, Alvarez-Ramos A, Martín-Ferrero M (2016) Minimally invasive polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis for 3–4 part proximal humeral fractures: our institutional experience. Injury 47:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fattoretto D, Borgo A, Iacobellis C (2016) The treatment of complexproximal humeral fractures: analysis of the results of 55 cases treated with PHILOS plate. Musculoskelet Surg 100(2):109–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Lajtai G et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:217–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wretenberg P, Ekelund A (1997) Acute hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture in old patients. A retrospective evaluation of 18 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop Scand 68:121–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Molé D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):401–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sirveaux F, Navez G, Favard L, Boileau P, Walch G, Mole D (2006) Reverse prosthesis for acute proximal humerus fracture, the multicentric study. In: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Sauramps Medical, Paris, pp 73–80

  33. Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L (2013) Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2050–2055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sebastiá-Forcada E, Cebrián-Gómez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillén V (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10:1419–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell JE (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:1737–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CMA, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Muh SJ, Streit JJ, Lenarz CJ, Shishani Y, Rowland DY et al (2013) Early follow-up of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(20):1877–1883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ek ET, Neukom L, Catanzaro S, Gerber C (2013) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five–fifteen years. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:1199–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), Orthopaedic Clinic, Pad. 40, IRCCS San Martino IST, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy

    I. Repetto, M. Alessio-Mazzola, P. Cerruti, F. Sanguineti, M. Formica & L. Felli

Authors
  1. I. Repetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Alessio-Mazzola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Cerruti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Sanguineti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Formica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Felli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Alessio-Mazzola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Repetto, I., Alessio-Mazzola, M., Cerruti, P. et al. Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty. Musculoskelet Surg 101, 153–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0451-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0451-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation