Restoring mobility after stroke: first kinematic results from a pilot study with a hybrid drop foot stimulator
- 302 Downloads
The objective was to obtain first insights into the kinematic and kinetic walking patterns resulting from an implanted functional electrical stimulation system in subjects with a drop foot caused by stroke.
Four subjects who experienced a stroke were chosen due to a comparatively long/short time after surgery and young/old at the stroke event were examined retrospectively with gait analysis. Kinematics and kinetics of normal walking were assessed in comparison with and without activated drop foot stimulation.
In general, an improvement regarding spatiotemporal parameters as a result of the stimulation could be observed. Walking speed was increased by 45 % and stride length by 22 % after a mean usage of 7 (2–14) months, whereas both younger subjects improved significantly more. Dorsiflexion increased in all subjects on average from 1.3° to 11.6° during initial contact as well as from 11.3° to 17.0° during mid-swing and therefore implies an advantage of around 5.5 inch foot clearance. Pathologic elements like knee hyperextension during loading response and mid-stance, leg circumduction during swing or the increased hip flexion of the contralateral leg during mid-stance could be in general adjusted with stimulation.
An implantable functional electrical stimulation system seems to be a promising treatment of drop feet following strokes. Further clinical investigations are necessary to confirm these first insights.
KeywordsDrop foot Stroke Functional electrical stimulation Implantable functional electrical Stimulation system
We like to thank Christopher Müller for drawings.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
- 10.The management of stroke rehabilitation working group. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. Version 2.0; 2010:150.4Google Scholar
- 14.van Swigchem R, Vloothuis J, den Boer J, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC (2010) Is transcutaneous peroneal stimulation beneficial to patients with chronic stroke using an ankle-foot orthosis? A within-subjects study of patient’s satisfaction, walking speed and physical activity level. J Rehabil Med 42:117–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Steinmetz H, Neumann-Haefelin T (2008) Die Schlaganfallzahlen bis zum Jahr 2050. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 26:467–473 (in German) Google Scholar
- 19.Busch M, Heuschmann P, Wiedmann S (2007) Recent changes in stroke mortality trends in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol 27(Suppl 1):S69–S70Google Scholar
- 20.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM) (2012) Schlaganfall DEGAM-Leitlinie Nr. 8. [Stroke DEGAM-Guidline No.8.] 1st ed. Balve: Zimmermann p 27 (in German)Google Scholar
- 25.Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ, Abrams GM, Annaswamy TM, Brandstater M et al (2014) The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28:688–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar