Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment on range of motion in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty becomes more widely used as a treatment for patients with painful cuff arthropathy. As a part of the deltopectoral approach, the subscapularis tendon, if present, is (partly) detached. There is no consensus on repair of the tendon after placement of the prosthesis. We retrospectively describe the clinical effects of subscapularis tendon reattachment. Our hypothesis was that subscapularis repair has no clinical effects on range of motion and functional outcome scores.

Methods

A retrospective clinical study is performed. An Aequalis reverse shoulder prosthesis (Tornier, Montbonnot, France) was placed in 65 patients with a mean age of 73.8 years (range 47–90). In 40 patients (61.5 %), the quality of the tendon was initially insufficient for repair. The subscapularis was repaired in 25 patients (38.5 %). After a mean follow-up of 36 months with a minimum of 12 months, an ultrasound examination of the subscapularis was performed in patients with a repaired tendon. Range of motion, strength, Constant–Murley and Oxford scores were measured.

Results

On ultrasound examination, 10 (40 %) out of 25 repaired subscapularis tendons were still sufficient. Postoperatively, range of motion, strength, Constant–Murley and Oxford scores did not differ significantly between repair with present tendon, repair with absent tendon or no repair.

Conclusion

In reverse shoulder arthroplasty, no significant differences on range of motion, functional outcome scores or strength were found between subscapularis repair or no repair, whether the tendon healed at follow-up or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roy JS, Macdermid JC, Goel D, Faber KJ, Athwal GS, Drosdowech DS (2010) What is a successful outcome following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? Open Orthop J 4:157–163. doi:10.2174/1874325001004010157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wall B, Nove-Josserand L, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G (2007) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1476–1485. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P, Farron A, Deransart P, Terrier A, Ston J, Walch G (2015) Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:2205–2213. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2984-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz D, Valenti P, Kany J, Elkholti K, Werthel JD (2016) Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up. Int Orthop 40:99–108. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2976-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14:147S–161S. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards TB, Williams MD, Labriola JE, Elkousy HA, Gartsman GM, O’Connor DP (2009) Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:892–896. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh JH, Shin SJ, McGarry MH, Scott JH, Heckmann N, Lee TQ (2014) Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1091–1098. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulahia A, Edwards TB, Walch G, Baratta RV (2002) Early results of a reverse design prosthesis in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder in elderly patients with a large rotator cuff tear. Orthopedics 25:129–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark JC, Ritchie J, Song FS, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hart ND, Hawkins RJ (2012) Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:36–41. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grassi FA, Zorzolo I (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without subscapularis repair for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Musculoskelet Surg 98:S5–S13. doi:10.1007/s12306-014-0321-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Routman HD (2013) The role of subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 71:S108–S112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164. doi:10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:593–600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR (2005) Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14:279–285. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I (2006) Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:527–540. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller BS, Joseph TA, Noonan TJ, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ (2005) Rupture of the subscapularis tendon after shoulder arthroplasty: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14:492–496. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M (2005) The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1697–1705. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J, Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Tian Y, Zhang Y (2015) Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2811-x

    Google Scholar 

  19. Molé D, Wein F, Dézaly C, Valenti P, Sirveaux F (2011) Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2461–2468. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1861-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, HagaZiekenhuis, Sportlaan 600, 2566 MJ, The Hague, The Netherlands

    F. A. de Boer, P. M. van Kampen & P. E. Huijsmans

Authors
  1. F. A. de Boer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. M. van Kampen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. E. Huijsmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. A. de Boer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Boer, F.A., van Kampen, P.M. & Huijsmans, P.E. The influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment on range of motion in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical study. Musculoskelet Surg 100, 121–126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0401-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0401-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation