Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Evolvability of Evolutionary Theories: A Reply to Denis Noble

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this commentary on Denis Noble’s “The Illusions of the Modern Synthesis,” I discuss three illusions he argues exist within the Modern Synthesis. These illusions have the common theme of attempting to identify the correct way of understanding and describing biological systems. I agree with much of Noble’s claims, but offer the language of developmental systems theory as a friendly tool for moving the project forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Darwin, C. (1872). The origin of species. John Murray

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, J. (2018). A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P., & Stotz, K. (2018). Developmental systems theory as process theory. In J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (2009). Living with Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (2013). Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology. Experimental Physiology, 98(8), 1235–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (2021). The Illusions of the Modern Synthesis. Biosemiotics, 14, 5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paley, W. (1802). Natural theology: or, Evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity. R. Faulder

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities, Yavapai College, Prescott, AZ, USA

    Andrew M. Winters

Authors
  1. Andrew M. Winters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew M. Winters.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winters, A.M. The Evolvability of Evolutionary Theories: A Reply to Denis Noble. Biosemiotics 14, 669–673 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09446-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09446-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation