Skip to main content
Log in

Illusions of Linguistics and Illusions of Modern Synthesis: Two Parallel Stories

Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article


Metaphors involve immense explanatory power and positive impact predominantly in the scientific education and popularization. Still the use of metaphors in science might be a double-edged sword. Introduction of the computer metaphor to many scientific fields in the last century resulted in reductionist approaches, oversimplifications and mechanistic explanations in science as well as in humanities. In this short commentary we developed further the computer metaphor by prof. Noble and the illusions this metaphor led to in genetics, linguistics and consequently DNA linguistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions


  • Bolshoy, A. (2003). DNA sequence analysis linguistic tools. Review Applied Bioinformatics, 2, 103–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolshoy, A. (2018). Towards an Encyclopaedia of sequence biology. Linguistic Frontiers, 1(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolshoy, A., Volkovich, Z., Kirzhner, V., & Barzily, Z. (2010). Genome clustering - from linguistic models to classification of genetic texts. Springer-Verlag.

  • Brendel, V., Beckman, J. S., & Trifonov, E. N. (1986). Linguistics of nucleotide sequences: Morphology and comparison of vocabularies. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 4, 11–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Beule, J. (2012). Von Neumann’s legacy for a scientific. Biosemiotics, 5(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.

  • Emmeche, C., & Kull, K. (Eds.). (2011). Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs. Imperial College Pres.

  • Faltýnek, D., Lacková, Ľ., & Owsianková, H. (2020). Once again about the hapax grammar: Epigenetic linguistics. Linguistic Frontiers, 3(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, D. (Ed.). (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Springer.

  • Gelfand, M. S. (1993). Genetic language: Metaphore or analogy? Biosystems, 30, 277–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmslev, L. (1975). Résumé of a Theory of Language. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague, vol. XVI. Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2002). The central dogma: A joke that became real. Semiotica, 138(1/4), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318–356.

  • Jakobson, R. (1963). Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics, Style in language. Éditions de Minuit.

  • Jakobson, R. (1971). Linguistics in relation to other sciences. In Jakobson, R. Selected writings 2: Word and language, 655–696, The Hague—Paris: Mouton.

  • Ji, S. (1997). Isomorphism between cell and human languages: Molecular biological, bioinformatic and linguistic implications. Biosystems, 44(1), 17–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konopka, A., & Martindale, C. (1995). Noncoding DNA, Zipf's law, and language. Science, 268, 789.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krassilov, V. (2014). Evolution: System theory. Pensoft Publishers Ltd..

  • Lacková, L. (2019). Towards a Processual Approach in Protein Studies. Biosemitoics 2, 469–480.

  • Lacková, L., Matlach, V., & Faltýnek, D. (2019). Bases are not letters: On the analogy between the genetic code and natural language by sequence analysis. Biosemiotics, 12(2), 289–304.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

  • Markoš, A., & Faltýnek, D. (2011). Language metaphors of life. Biosemiotics, 4(2), 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nida, E. A. (1979). Componential analysis of meaning: an introduction to semantic structures, (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton. pp. 32–33.

  • Noble, D. (2016). Dance to the tunes of life. Cambridge University Press.

  • Noble, D. (2021). The illusions of the modern synthesis. Biosemiotics, 14(1).

  • Pattee, H. H. (2008). Physical and functional conditions for symbols, codes, and languages. Biosemiotics, 1, 147–168.

  • Trasmundi, S. B., & Cobley, P. (2021). A dialogue between distributed language and reading disciplines. Language Sciences, 84.

  • Trifonov, E. N. (1988). Codes of nucleotide sequences. Mathematical Biosciences, 90(1–2), 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifonov, E. N. (1989). The multiple codes of nucleotide sequences. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 51, 417–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trifonov, E.N. and Brendel, V. (1987). Gnomic: Dictionary of genetic codes. Balaban publishers, 1986; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH.

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison Wesley.

Download references


This work was supported by project Sinophone Borderlands: Interaction at the Edges, n. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000791.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ľudmila Lacková.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolshoy, A., Lacková, Ľ. Illusions of Linguistics and Illusions of Modern Synthesis: Two Parallel Stories. Biosemiotics 14, 115–119 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: