Advertisement

Biosemiotics

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Towards a Processual Approach in Protein Studies

  • Ľudmila LackováEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The present paper attempts to demonstrate semiotic arguments against the sequence → structure → function paradigm in protein studies. The unidirectional deterministic thinking in biological processes has been challenged by several disciplines of life sciences (epigenetics, proteomics, etc.) and philosophy (process philosophy). Biosemiotics comprehends living organisms as actively participating in their present and somehow creating or shaping their future, having a plurality of options for acting. Determinism and unidirectionality are in contradiction with a biosemiotic approach towards life, mostly when considering Peirce’s triadic concept of semiosis. In this paper, a Peircean biosemiotic approach is applied to proteins and to the process of protein folding. Two main concepts are presented to support the arguments against the SSF paradigm in protein studies: the NonReduction Theorem and the notion of folded continuum. A processual approach is proposed as the most suitable for descriptions of proteins and their functions.

Keywords

Folding of a continuum NonReduction theorem Peirce Protein folding Semiotic continuum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by an internal research grant of Faculty of Arts, Palacký University in Olomouc (2019-2021), project number FPVC2019/03. I declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burch, R. W. (1992). Valental aspects of Peircean algebraic logic. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 23(6), 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burch, R. W. (1997). Peirce’s reduction thesis. In N. Van Evra et al. (Eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce (pp. 234–251). Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cimatti, F. (2000). Nel segno del cerchio. L'ontologia semiotica di Giorgio Prodi. Roma: Manifestolibri.Google Scholar
  4. Das, R. K., Ruff, K., Pappu, M., & Rohit, V. (2015). Relating sequence encoded information to form and function of intrinsically disordered proteins. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 32, 102–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2015.03.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dupré, J. (2010). How to be naturalistic without being simplistic in the study of human nature. In M. de Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism and normativity (pp. 289–303). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2005). Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, 6, 197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Guttinger, S. (2018). A process ontology for macromolecular biology. In D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (pp. 303–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Henderson, B., & Martin, A. (2011). Bacterial virulence in the moonlight: Multitasking bacterial moonlighting proteins are virulence determinants. Infectious Disease, 79(9), 3476–3491.Google Scholar
  9. Hernández, S., Amela, I., Cedano, J., Piñol, J., Perez-Pons, J. A., Mozo-Villarias, A., & Querol, E. (2012). Do moonlighting proteins belong to the intrinsic disordered proteins class? Journal of Proteomics Bioinformatics, 5(11), 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Semiotic scaffolding of living systems. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis (pp. 149–166). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Huberts, D. H., & van der Klei, I. J. (2010). Moonlighting proteins: An intriguing mode of multitasking. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 1803(4), 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeffery, C. (2005) Mass Spectrometry and the Search for Moonlighting Proteins. Mass Spec Rev 24, 772-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffery, C. (2014). An introduction to protein moonlighting. Biochemical Society Transactions, 42(6), 1679–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ketner, K. L., Bisanz, E., Cunningham, S. R., Hendrick, C., Johnson, L., McLaughlin, T., & O’Boyle, M. (2011). Peirce’s NonReduction and relational completeness claims in the context of first-order predicate logic. KODIKAS/CODE: Ars Semeiotica, 34(1–2), 3–14.Google Scholar
  16. Kister, A. (2015) Amino acid distribution rules predict protein fold: protein grammar for beta-strand sandwich-like structures, Biomolecules, 5, 41-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kull, K. (2015). Evolution, choice, and scaffolding: Semiosis is changing its own building. Biosemiotics, 8(2), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Markoš, A., & Švorcová, J. (2018). Epigenetic processes and evolution of life. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  19. Osolsobě, I. (2002). Ostenze, hra, jazyk. Sémiotické studie. Brno: Host.Google Scholar
  20. Paolucci, C. (2004). Piegature della continuità. Semiotica interpretativa e semiotica generativa, Versus. Quaderni di studi semiotici (Vol. 97, pp. 111–150). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  21. Peirce, C. S., & Welby, V. (1977). In C. S. Hardwick (Ed.), Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Perutz, M. F. (1962). Relation between structure and sequence of haemoglobin. Nature, 194, 914–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prodi, G. (1988). La cultura come ermeneutica naturale. Intersezioni, 8 (1), 23–48. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  24. Sharov, A. A. (2010). Functional information: Towards synthesis of biosemiotics and cybernetics. Entropy, 12(5), 1050–1070.  https://doi.org/10.3390/e12051050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharov, A. A., & Vehkavaara, T. (2015). Protosemiosis: Agency with reduced representation capacity. Biosemiotics, 8(1), 103–123.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9219-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stein, R. L. (2004). Towards a process philosophy of chemistry. HYLE International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 10(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  27. Wright, P. E., & Dyson, H. J. (1999). Intrinsically unstructured proteins: Re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. Journal of Molecular Biology, 293(2), 321–331.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Palacký University OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations