Advertisement

Jesper Hoffmeyer: Biosemiotics Is a Discovery

  • Kalevi KullEmail author
  • Ekaterina Velmezova
Historical Essays: Interview
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Here we publish an interview with Jesper Hoffmeyer, conducted in 2012–2014.

Keywords

History of biosemiotics Semiotic turn Charles Peirce Jakob von Uexküll Juri Lotman 

Notes

References

  1. Bundgaard, P., & Stjernfelt, F. (2009). Signs and meaning: 5 questions. New York: Automatic Press, VIP.Google Scholar
  2. Cassirer, E. (1950). The problem of knowledge: Philosophy, science, and history since Hegel. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: A Bradford Book, the MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deely, J. (2009). Basics of semiotics. 5th ed. (Tartu Semiotics Library 4.2.) Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
  7. Emmeche, C.; Kull, K., & Stjernfelt, F. (2002). Reading Hoffmeyer, rethinking biology. (Tartu Semiotics Library 3.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffmeyer, J. (1990a). Semiosis og liv. Almen Semiotik, 1(1), 58–63.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffmeyer, J. (1990b). Liv & kultur i omverden. OMverden, 1(1), 3–4.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1993). En snegl på vejen: Betydningens naturhistorie. [A snail on the path: The natural history of significance.] Copenhagen: Rosinante.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmeyer, J. (1996 [1993]). Signs of meaning in the universe. (Haveland, B. J., trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hoffmeyer, J. (2001). Seeing virtuality in nature. Semiotica (Special issue: Jakob von Uexküll: A paradigm for biology and semiotics. Kull, K., ed.), 134(1/4): 381–398.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffmeyer, J. (2004). Uexküllian Planmässigkeit. Sign Systems Studies, 32, 73–97.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmeyer, J. (2005). Biosemiotik: En afhandling om livets tegn og tegnenes liv. Charlottenlund: Ries Forlag.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008a [2005]). Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. (Hoffmeyer, J.; Favareau, D., trans.) Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffmeyer, J. (ed.) (2008b). A legacy of living systems: Gregory Bateson as precursor to biosemiotics. (Biosemiotics 2.) Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hoffmeyer, J. (2014 [2008]). Biosemiootika: Uurimus elu märkidest ja märkide elust. (Gigantum Humeris.) (Puhang, E., trans.) Tallinn: TLÜ kirjastus.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson, M., & Merrell, F. (eds.), On semiotic modeling. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 117–166.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmeyer, J., & Kull, K. (2011). Theories of signs and meaning: Views from Copenhagen and Tartu. In: Emmeche, C., & Kull, K. (eds.), Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs. London: Imperial College Press, 263–286.Google Scholar
  20. Jonas, H. (2001 [1966]). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kull, K. (2014). Biosemiootika võtmed: Küsimustele vastab Jesper Hoffmeyer. (Rünkla, L., trans.) Raamat, 11(89) (Dec. 11): 10.Google Scholar
  22. Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Midgley, M. (2002 [1979]). Beast and man: The roots of human nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Noble, D. (2006). The music of life: Biology beyond the genome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sebeok, T. A. (1989 [1979]). The sign and its masters. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  27. Stjernfelt, F. (1992). Formens betydning: Katastrofeteori og semiotik. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SemioticsUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations