Jesper Hoffmeyer: Biosemiotics Is a Discovery

  • Kalevi KullEmail author
  • Ekaterina Velmezova
Historical Essays: Interview


Here we publish an interview with Jesper Hoffmeyer, conducted in 2012–2014.


History of biosemiotics Semiotic turn Charles Peirce Jakob von Uexküll Juri Lotman 



  1. Bundgaard, P., & Stjernfelt, F. (2009). Signs and meaning: 5 questions. New York: Automatic Press, VIP.Google Scholar
  2. Cassirer, E. (1950). The problem of knowledge: Philosophy, science, and history since Hegel. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: A Bradford Book, the MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deely, J. (2009). Basics of semiotics. 5th ed. (Tartu Semiotics Library 4.2.) Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
  7. Emmeche, C.; Kull, K., & Stjernfelt, F. (2002). Reading Hoffmeyer, rethinking biology. (Tartu Semiotics Library 3.) Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffmeyer, J. (1990a). Semiosis og liv. Almen Semiotik, 1(1), 58–63.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffmeyer, J. (1990b). Liv & kultur i omverden. OMverden, 1(1), 3–4.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1993). En snegl på vejen: Betydningens naturhistorie. [A snail on the path: The natural history of significance.] Copenhagen: Rosinante.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmeyer, J. (1996 [1993]). Signs of meaning in the universe. (Haveland, B. J., trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hoffmeyer, J. (2001). Seeing virtuality in nature. Semiotica (Special issue: Jakob von Uexküll: A paradigm for biology and semiotics. Kull, K., ed.), 134(1/4): 381–398.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffmeyer, J. (2004). Uexküllian Planmässigkeit. Sign Systems Studies, 32, 73–97.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmeyer, J. (2005). Biosemiotik: En afhandling om livets tegn og tegnenes liv. Charlottenlund: Ries Forlag.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008a [2005]). Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. (Hoffmeyer, J.; Favareau, D., trans.) Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffmeyer, J. (ed.) (2008b). A legacy of living systems: Gregory Bateson as precursor to biosemiotics. (Biosemiotics 2.) Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hoffmeyer, J. (2014 [2008]). Biosemiootika: Uurimus elu märkidest ja märkide elust. (Gigantum Humeris.) (Puhang, E., trans.) Tallinn: TLÜ kirjastus.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson, M., & Merrell, F. (eds.), On semiotic modeling. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 117–166.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmeyer, J., & Kull, K. (2011). Theories of signs and meaning: Views from Copenhagen and Tartu. In: Emmeche, C., & Kull, K. (eds.), Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs. London: Imperial College Press, 263–286.Google Scholar
  20. Jonas, H. (2001 [1966]). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kull, K. (2014). Biosemiootika võtmed: Küsimustele vastab Jesper Hoffmeyer. (Rünkla, L., trans.) Raamat, 11(89) (Dec. 11): 10.Google Scholar
  22. Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Midgley, M. (2002 [1979]). Beast and man: The roots of human nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Noble, D. (2006). The music of life: Biology beyond the genome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sebeok, T. A. (1989 [1979]). The sign and its masters. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  27. Stjernfelt, F. (1992). Formens betydning: Katastrofeteori og semiotik. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SemioticsUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations