Advertisement

Biosemiotics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 349–356 | Cite as

Methodologies of Curiosity: Epistemology, Practice, and the Question of Animal Minds

Review of: Frans de Waal. Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? 2016. W. W. Norton & Company: New York. 340 p.
  • Yogi Hale HendlinEmail author
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Umwelt theory has finally come of age. The paradigm-breaking power of Jakob von Uexküll’s technical term, after decades of inquiry by scholars such as Merleau-Ponty (1962) and Kauffman (1993) has become part of the vernacular of animal studies, psychology, sociology, and other scientific domains (Buchanan 2008; Lahti 2015; Stevens et al. 2018). The newfound fame of the Umwelt frame, however, is as much a boon to the field of biosemiotics as it is a burden, due to the usual serial misinterpretation and cooptation that occurs in popularizing a concept.

One prominent scholar, however, deeply wedded to the original lineage of meaning Umwelt theory offers, is the renowned ethologist and primatologist Frans de Waal, who has based his life work on understanding its core meaning through experimentation. From the first to the last page of de Waal’s latest overview of animal cognition, he anchors his interpretations in classical as well as cognitive ethology—steeped in the contributions of von...

Notes

References

  1. Abram, D. (1996). Merleau-Ponty and the voice of the earth. In D. Macauley (Ed.), Minding nature: The philosophers of ecology (pp. 82–101). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barto, E. K., Weidenhamer, J. D., Cipollini, D., & Rillig, M. C. (2012). Fungal superhighways: Do common mycorrhizal networks enhance below ground communication? Trends in Plant Science, 17(11), 633–637.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind (University of Chicago Press ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, B. (2008). Onto-ethologies: The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cavalieri, P., & Singer, P. (1994). The Great ape project: Equality beyond humanity (1st U.S. ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  6. de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. In S. Macedo & J. Ober (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. de Waal, F. (2016). Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? (1 edition.). W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  8. Ganis, R. (2011). The politics of Care in Habermas and Derrida: Between measurability and immeasurability. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3 edition.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hendlin, Y. H., & Ott, K. (2016). Habermas on nature: A postnormal reading between moral intuitions and theoretical restrictiveness. Environmental Ethics, 38(2), 183–208.  https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201638215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrmann, E., & Call, J. (2012). Are there geniuses among the apes? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2753–2761.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics: an examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. (J. Hoffmeyer & D. Favareau, Trans.). Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution (1 edition.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lahti, D. C. (2015). The limits of artificial stimuli in behavioral research: The umwelt gamble. Ethology, 121(6), 529–537.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Low, P., Panskepp, J., Reiss, D., Edelman, D., Van Swinderen, B., & Koch, C. (2012). The Cambridge declaration on consciousness. Presented at the Francis crick memorial conference on consciousness in human and non-human animals, Cambridge [England]. http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
  18. Lurz, R. W. (Ed.). (2009). The philosophy of animal minds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lurz, R. W. (2011). Mindreading animals: The debate over what animals know about other minds. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mancuso, S. (2018). The revolutionary genius of plants: A new understanding of plant intelligence and behavior (Translation edition.). New York: Atria Books.Google Scholar
  21. Markoš, A., Grygar, F., Hajnal, L., Kleisner, K., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). What is the source of likeness? In Life as its own designer. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sebeok, T. A., & Umiker-Sebeok, D. J. (1980). Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stengers, I. (1997). Power and invention: Situating science. (P. Bains, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stevens, L., Tait, P., & Varney, D. (Eds.). (2018). Feminist ecologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64385-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stich, S. P. (1986). From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief (2. printing.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Tomasello, M. (2006). Why don’t apes point? In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 506–524). New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  28. Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Trewavas, A. J., & Baluška, F. (2011). The ubiquity of consciousness. EMBO Reports, 12(12), 1221–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Uexküll, J. von. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning. (J. D. ONeil, Trans.). Minneapolis: Univ Of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erasmus School of PhilosophyErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Core Faculty, Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity InitiativeErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
  3. 3.Environmental Health InitiativeUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations