Rural Sanctuary: an Ecosemiotic Agency to Preserve Human Cultural Heritage and Biodiversity
A Rural Sanctuary is defined as an area where farming activity creates habitats for a diverse assemblage of species that find a broad spectrum of resources along the season. A Rural Sanctuary is proposed as a new model of land management to protect nature inside a framework of cultural identity and agro-forestry sustainability. A Rural Sanctuary has a dual mission: to provide immaterial (amenity, sense of place, conservation of cultural heritage) and material (agricultural products) resources for people, and to guarantee living spaces to a large assemblage of species. A Rural Sanctuary represents an ecosemiotic agency in which human eco-fields and animal eco-fields interact. This reflects a model that is rooted in the Mediterranean region, where for long time people and nature have harmoniously lived in strict contact and inter-dependence. An example of a Rural Sanctuary from this region is proposed to demonstrate the amazing diversity of living beings observed on only few hectares of farmland. A Rural Sanctuary offers possibilities to educate people about a more sustainable approach to nature, and it represents a unique place to investigate animal perception. Finally, between the different approach to certify the validity of a Rural Sanctuary, sound recording is suggested as one of the less invasive methods for ecological investigation and long-term monitoring.
KeywordsRural sanctuary Ecosemiotics Full world Eco-field Nature conservation Mediterranean landscape
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Aniah, P., & Yelfaanibe, A. (2017). Environment, development and sustainability of local practices in the sacred groves and shrines in Bongo District: a bio-cultural study for environmental management in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10668-017-0001-2.
- Blondel, J., & Aronson, J. (1999). Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford: Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
- Cecere, J. G., Panuccio, M., Chiarugi, A., Urbano, F., Imperio, S., Celada, C., & Lopez-Lopez, P. (2017). Snake species richness predicts breeding distribution of short-toed snake eagle in central Italy. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1080/03940370.2017.1323800.
- Clayton, S., Colleony, A., Conversy, P., Maclouf, E., Martin, L., Torres, A.-C., Truong, M., & Prevot, A.-C. (2016). Transformation of experience: Toward a new relationship with nature. Conservation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/concl.12337.
- Dos Santos, S., Adams, E. A., Neville, G., Wda, Y., de Sherbinin, A., Mullin Bernhardt, E., Adamo, S. B. (2017). Urban growth and water access in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress challenges, and emerging research direction. Science of Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.157.
- Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hale, R., & Swearer, S.E. (2017). Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 283, 20152647.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis.Google Scholar
- IPCC (2013). Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor,M. Allen, S.K., J (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, 2014. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
- IUCN (2000). IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1 Second Edition.Google Scholar
- Kull, K. (1998). Semiotic ecology: Different natures in the semiosphere. Sign Systems. Studies, 26, 344–371.Google Scholar
- Lepart, J., & Debussche, M. (1992). Human impact on landscape patterning: Mediterranean examples. In: Hansen, A.J., di Castri, F. (Eds.), Landscape boundaries. Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows (pp. 76–106) New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Maiorano, L., Amori, G., Capula, M., Falcucci, A., Masi, M., Montemaggiori, A., Pottier, J., Psomas, A., Rondinini, C., Russo, D., Zimmermann, N. E., Boitani, l., & Guisan, A. (2013). Threats from climate change to terrestrial vertebrate hotspots in Europe. PLoS One, 8(9), e74989. https://doi.org/10.1371/Journal.pone.0074989.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M., & Gascon, C. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: The critical role of hotspots. In F. E. Zachos & J. C. Habel (Eds.), Biodiversity hotspots: Distribution and protection of conservation priority areas (pp. 3–22). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mullet, T., Farina, A., & Gage, S. H. (2017). The acoustic habitat hypothesis: An ecoacoustic perspective on species habitat selection. Biosemiotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-017-9288-5.
- Naveh, Z. (1998). From biodiversity to ecodiversity - Holistic conservation of the biological and cultural diversity of Mediterranean landscapes. In P. W. Rundel, G. Montenegro, & F. M. Jaksic (Eds.), Landscape disturbance and biodiversity in Mediterranean-type ecosystems (pp. 23–53). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nöth, W. (1998). Ecosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 332–343.Google Scholar
- Piano, E., De Wolf, K., et al. (2017). Urbanization drives community shifts towards thermophilic and dispersive species at local and landscape scales. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13606.
- Strang, V. (2016). Justice for all: Inconvenient truths and reconciliation in human-non-human relations. In H. Kopnina & E. Shoreman-Ouimet (Eds.), Routledge handbook of environmental anthropology (pp. 263–278). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tonelli, M., Verdù, J. R., & Zunino, M. (2017). Effects of the progressive abandonment of grazing on dung beetle biodiversity: body size matters. Biodiversity and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10531-017-1428-3.
- Uexküll, J.V., 1982(1940). The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42, 25–82.Google Scholar
- Uexküll, J.V, 1992(1934). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–391.Google Scholar
- Vladimirova, E., & Mozgovoy, J. (2003). Sign field theory and tracking techniques used in studies of small carnivorous mammals. Evolution and Cognition, 9(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Vos, W., & Stortelder, A. (1992). Vanishing Tuscan landscapes: Landscape ecology of a Sud-Mediterranean-montane area (Solano Basin, Tuscany, Italy). Wageningen (The Netherlands): Pudoc Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
- WWF (World Wildlife Fund) (2014). Living Planet Report 2014. Available from: http://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/living-planet-report-2014 Accessed August 29, 2016.