, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 85–103 | Cite as

Prion-Like Phenomena Mediating Between Modes of Individuation

  • Vefa Karatay
  • Yagmur DenizhanEmail author


Prions, prion-related diseases and prion-like phenomena are not only the subjects of rapidly growing scientific research interests, but also appear to be interesting from a philosophical perspective. In this study, we first present a brief review of the current prion research that includes a conceptual expansion of the notion of “prion” as a pathogenic conformation of a specific mammalian protein, towards more general “prion-like phenomena”, that can sometimes assume important beneficial functions in a broad range of biological contexts. Next, we introduce Gilbert Simondon’s theory of individuation, which is a philosophical framework applicable to all possible domains of becoming. In contrast to the common approach of dividing the realm of ontogenetic processes into distinct domains and treating them separately, Simondon distinguishes between different modes of the same process: i.e., the physical, vital, and psycho-collective modes. His theory thus appears relevant with regard to the notion of prion-like phenomena in the extended sense, which seems to provide a useful metaphor for better understanding different modes of individuation and transitions between them. In particular, the transition from the physical to the vital mode is closely related to some core questions of biosemiotics such as the emergence of life from non-life, as well as “how a molecule became a sign”, which today constitute blank spots where the classical specialised disciplines of natural sciences fall short of satisfactory explanations. When recent scientific findings on prion-related phenomena are interpreted in the context of Simondon’s ontogenetic framework, the question related to the origin of life in our provocative title gains a different meaning.


Prions Prion-like mechanisms Simondon Individuation Origin of life 



We would like to thank Jean-Hugues Barthélémy, the Director of the Centre international des études simondoniennes, for his very attentive and heedful guidance regarding the usage of Simondonian notions.

We are also indebted to Alexei Sharov, who –with his fruitful questions during the Sixteenth Annual Gathering in Biosemiotics (2016) and the valuable literature he has provided us with– has instigated us to a deeper discussion of the origin of life.

Finally, we want to express our gratitude to Fatima Cvrčková for bringing to our attention the very relevant publication on prion-related phenomena in the plant kingdom (Chakrabortee et al. 2016).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Bardini, T. Relational ontology, Simondon, and the hope for a third culture inside biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 2017, 10, 131–137.Google Scholar
  2. Barthélémy, J.-H. (2012). Glossary: Fifty key terms in the works of Gilbert Simondon. In A. De Boever (Ed.), Gilbert Simondon: Being and technology (pp. 203–231). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barthélémy, J-H. (2015). Aspects of a philosophy of the living, trans. Barnaby Norman. In Life and technology: An inquiry into and beyond Simondon (pp. 15–44), Lüneburg: Scholar
  4. Botsios, S., & Manuelidis, L. (2016). CJD and scrapie require agent-associated nucleic acids for infection. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 9999, 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Cairns-Smith, A. G. (1982). Genetic takeover and the mineral origins of life. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chakrabortee, S., Kayatekin, C., Newby, G. A., Mendillo, M. L., Lancaster, A., & Lindquist, S. (2016). Luminidependens (LD) is an Arabidopsis protein with prion behaviour. PNAS, 113(21), 6065–6070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Fűchslin, R. M., & McCaskill, J. S. (2001). Evolutionary self-organization of cell-free genetic coding. PNAS, 98(16), 9185–9190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Halfmann, R. (2014). The bright side of prions. Scientist, 28(1), 44–50.Google Scholar
  9. Halfmann, R., & Lindquist, S. (2010). Epigenetics in the extreme: prions and the inheritance of environmentally acquired traits. Science, 330, 629–632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hazen, R. M., Papineau, D., Bleeker, W., Downs, R. T., Ferry, F., McCoy, T., Sverjensky, D., & Yang, H. (2008). Mineral evolution. American Mineralogist, 93, 1693–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinrich, S. U., & Lindquist, S. (2011). Protein-only mechanism induces self-perpetuating changes in the activity of neuronal Aplysia cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEB). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States America, 108, 2999–3004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffmeyer, J. (2015). Semiotic scaffolding of multicellularity. Biosemiotics, 8, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.), On semiotic modeling (pp. 117–166). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, D. L., Lancaster, A. K., Lindquist, S., & Halfmann, R. (2013). Heritable remodeling of yeast multicellularity by an environmentally responsive prion. Cell, 153(1), 153–165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyman, A., Weber, C. A., & Julicher, F. (2014). Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 30, 39–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyman, T., & Brangwynne, C. (2012). In retrospect: the origin of life. Nature, 491, 524–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Illiadis, A. (2013). Informational ontology: the meaning of Gilbert Simondon’s concept of individuation. Communication +1, 2, Article 5.Google Scholar
  18. Jablonka, E. (2002). Information: its interpretation, its inheritance, and its sharing. Philosophy of Science, 69, 578–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in four dimensions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, W. S., & Krost, C. (2014). Peculiarities of prion diseases. PLOS Pathogens, 10(11), e1004451.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarrett, J. T., & Lansbury Jr., P. T. (1993). Seeding “one-dimensional crystallization” of amyloid: a pathogenic mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease and scrapie? Cell, 73(6), 1055–1058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Karatay, V., Denizhan, Y., & Ozansoy, M. (2016). Semiosis as individuation: integration of multiple orders of magnitude. Biosemiotics, 9, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lansbury Jr., P. T., & Caughey, B. (1995). The chemistry of scrapie infection: implications of the ‘ice 9’ metaphor. Chemistry & Biology, 2, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liebman, S. W., & Chernoff, Y. O. (2012). Prions in yeast. Genetics, 191, 1041–1072.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindquist, S. (2015). Lamarck was right: better living through chemistry.
  26. Lindquist, S. (2016). Prions: protein elements of genetic diversity.
  27. Maury, C. P. J. (2015). Origin of life. Primordial genetics: Information transfer in a pre-RNA world based on self-replicating beta-sheet amyloid conformers. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 382, 292–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mills, S. (2014). PhD thesis. Gilbert Simondon: Causality, ontogenesis & technology. EngD, University of the West of England.Google Scholar
  29. Newby, G. A., & Lindquist, S. (2013). Blessings in disguise: biological benefits of prion-like mechanisms. Trends in Cell Biology, 23(6), 251–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pattee, H. H. (1969). How does a molecule become a message? Developmental Biology Supplement, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
  31. Prigogine, I., & Lefever, R. (1973). Theory of dissipative structures. In H. Haken (Ed.), Synergetics (pp. 124–135). Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prusiner, S. B. (1982). Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science, 216, 136–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sharov, A. (2016). Co-enzyme world model of the origin of life. Biosystems, 144, 8–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Simondon, G. (2009). The position of the problem of ontogenesis, tr. Gregory Flanders. Parrhesia, 1(7), 4–16.Google Scholar
  36. Soto, C. (2011). Prion hypothesis: the end of the controversy? Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 36(3), 151–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Toscano, A. (2006). Tertium Datur? Gilbert Simondon’s relational ontology. In The theatre of production philosophy and individuation between Kant and Deleuze (pp. 136–156). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 237(641), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vonnegut, K. (1963). Cat’s cradle (p. 30). New York: Random House Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, F., Wang, X., Yuan, C. G., & Ma, J. (2010). Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science, 327, 1132–1135.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Weber, S. C., & Brangwynne, C. P. (2012). Getting RNA and protein in phase. Cell, 149, 1188–1191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. White-Grindley, E., Li, L., Khan, R. M., Ren, F., Saraf, A., Florens, L., & Si, K. (2014). Contribution of Orb2A stability in regulated amyloid-like oligomerization of Drosophila Orb2. PLoS Biology, 12(2), e1001786. Scholar
  43. Wickner, R. B. (1994). [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science, 264, 566–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wills, P. R. (1989). Genetic information and the determination of functional organization in biological systems. Systems Research, 6(3), 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wills, P. R. (2013). Frameshifted prion proteins as pathological agents: quantitative considerations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 325, 52–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Biologist, Indepedent ResearcherIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Electrical and Electronics Engineering DepartmentBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations