Abstract
This paper explains how recent changes in the ways we study other animals to better understand the human faculty of language are indicative of changing narratives concerning the intelligence of other animals. Uexküll’s concept of Umwelt as a species-specific model of the world is essential to understanding the semiotic abilities of all organisms, including humans. From this follows the view that human language is primarily a cognitive tool for making models of the world. This view is consistent with the basic premises of cognitive linguistics. The rejection of behaviorism in linguistics represents a turning point in the history of animal studies. The resulting criticism of long-term studies with primates illustrates this shift concerning the study of wild animals within the language sciences and beyond. New insights in dog cognition and research on the processing of human language in canines are reflective of a change in focus away from anthropocentrism towards the species-specific semiotic abilities of animals in the twenty-first century. This new orientation away from comparing animal sign-systems to human language and the importance of studying intelligent wild animals in the wild instead of in captivity have lead to an important re-evaluation of our relationship with other animals and our views of their cognitive and semiotic profiles. This leads to questions such as what role non-human organisms can play in the language sciences, and what our limitations are of studying the sign systems of other animals. Recent research on the signifying abilities of wild dolphins, for instance, has identified a new set of characteristics by which to study intelligence in other species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Wheeler, S. Radiolab – Kanzi. http://www.radiolab.org/story/91708-kanzi/ retrieved February 2018
References
Abramson, J. Z., et al. (2018). Imitation of novel conspecific and human speech sounds in the killer whale (Orcinus Orca), Proceeding of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. January, 31, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2681.
Anderson, M., & Merrell, F. (Eds.). (1991). On semiotic modeling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Andics, A., Gábor, A., Gácsi, M., Faragó, T., Szabó, D., & Miklósi, Á. (2016). Neural mechanisms of lexical processing in dogs. Science, 353(6303), 1030–1032.
Andrews, E. (2011). Language and brain: Recasting meaning in the definition of human language. Semiotica, 184(1), 11–32.
Augustyn, P. (2009). Uexküll, Peirce, and other affinities between biolinguistics and biosemiotics in. Biosemiotics, 3(1), 1–17.
Augustyn, P. (2013). What connects biolinguistics and biosemiotics? Biolinguistics 7(4). Open Journal Systems, 96–111.
Berreby, D. (2014). What makes an alien intelligent? The New Yorker April, 21, 2014.
Bomey, N. (2016). Seaworld to phase out killer whale shows. captivity In USA Today, (March 17, 2016).
Bradshaw, J. (2011). In defense of dogs. Allen Lane.
Čadková, L. (2015). Do they speak language? Biosemiotics, 8(1), 9–27.
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal behavior by B.F. Skinner. Language, 35(1), 26–58.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1–22.
Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2007). Biolinguistic explorations: Design, development, and evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies., 15(1), 1–21.
Chomsky, N. (2009 [1966]). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cowperthwaite, G. (2013). Blackfish. Magnolia Pictures: Documentary.
Cucchiaro, M. A. (2007/2008). On the myth of ape language. Interview with Noam Chomsky, retrieved December 2016 https://chomsky.info/2007____/
Ecolinguistics. (2016). Retrieved December 2016 from http://ecolinguistics-association.org
Family Dog Project. Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary. Retrieved December 2016 http://etologia.elte.hu/en/home-2/
Fillmore, C. F. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 20–32.
Gardner, R. A., & Gardner, B. T. (1984). A vocabulary test for chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98, 381–404.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London: Harper and Row.
Halloran, A. (2012). The song of the ape. Understanding the languages of chimpanzees. St Martin’s Press.
Hauser, M. D., & Bever, T. G. (2008). A biolinguistic agenda. Science, 322, 1057–1059.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Herzing, D. (2014). Profiling non-human intelligence: An exercise in developing unbiased tools for describing other “types” of intelligence on earth. Acta Astronautica, 94(2), 676–680.
Herzing, D. (2015). Dolphin communication and cognition. MIT Press.
Hinchman, L. P., & Hinchman, S. K. (2007). What we owe the romantics. Environmental Values, 16(3), 333–354.
Hockett, C., (1982[1960]). The origin of speech. Wang, W.S-Y. (ed.) Human Communication: Language and its Psychobiological Bases, Scientific American, 1982 (Paper originally published in Scientific American, 1960).
Hodson, H. (2014). Dolphin whistle instantly translated by computer, Technology News, 26 march 2014.
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics. Explorations into the life of signs and the signs of life. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.
Horowitz, A. (2009). Inside of a dog. What dogs see, smell, and know. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics. Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kharlamov, V., Campbell, K., & Kazanina, N. (2011). Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for early and automatic detection of phonological equivalence in variable speech inputs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3331–3342.
Kull, K. (2003). Ladder, tree, web: Ages of biological understanding, Sign Systems. Studies, 31(2), 589–602.
Ladefoged, P. (2004). Phonetics and phonology in the last 50 years, UCLA Working. Papers in Linguistics, 103, 1–11.
Lakoff, G. (2009). The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. New York: Penguin Books.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1993 [1991]). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley.
Linden, E. (1987). Silent partners: The legacy of the ape language experiments. Balantine Books.
Lorenz, K. (1941). Kants Lehre vom apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie. Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie, 15, 94–125.
Lorenz, K. (1971). Studies in animal and human behaviour 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Magnus, R. (2015). The semiotic grounds of animal assistance: Sign use of guide dogs and their visually impaired handlers. Dissertation. Tartu University.
Marsh, J. (2011). Project Nim. BBC Films: Documentary.
McConnell, P. (2003). The other end of the leash. Why we do what we do around dogs. Ballantine Books.
Miklosi, A. (2015). Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford University Press.
Ohala, J.J. (1996). Ethological theory and the expression of emotion in the voice, Proceedings of the ICSLP 96, October 3–6, 1996 Wilmington: University of Delaware 3, 1812–1815.
Ohala, J. J. (2004). Phonetics and phonology then, and then, and now. H. Quene and V. Van Heuven (Eds.) On speech and language: Studies for Sieb G. Nooteboom. LOT Occasional Series, 2, 133–140.
Owens, L. (2018). Scientists teach orca to talk, but there is a darker side. In Newshub. http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2018/02/scientists-teach-orca-to-talk-but-there-is-a-darker-side.html
Peirce, C.S. (1935-1966). Collected papers. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A.W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (References to volumes and paragraphs).
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1986). Ape language: From conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sebeok, T. A., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1980). Speaking of apes. A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. New York: Plenum.
Skinner, B. F. (1959). Verbal behavior. Copley Publishing Group.
Terrace, H. S. (1979). Nim. New York: Knopf.
von Uexküll, G. (1964) Jakob von Uexküll. Seine Welt und seine Umwelt. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
University of Wollongong Job advertisement retrieved November 2016 http://uow.employment.com.au/jobs/Lecturer---Senior-Lecturer--English-Language-and-Linguistics/2414
Verhagen, F. C. (2008). Worldviews and metaphors in the human-nature relationship: An ecolinguistic exploration through the ages. Language and. Ecology, 2, 1–18.
von Uexküll, J. (1902). Psychologie und Biologie in ihrer Stellung zur Tierseele. Ergebnisse der. Physiologie, 1, 212–233.
von Uexküll, J. (1920). Theoretische Biologie. Heidelberg: Suhrkamp.
von Uexküll, T. (1982). Introduction: Meaning and science in Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of biology. Semiotica, 42(1), 1–24.
Wade, N. (1980). Does man alone have language? Apes reply in riddles, and a horse says neigh. Science, 208, 1349–1351.
Weber, A. (2008) Alles Fühlt. Mensch, Natur, und die Revolution der Lebenswissenschaften. Berlin: Berl. Verlag.
Wirth, L. (1928). Theoretical biology by J. von Uexküll; D. L. Mackinnon transl. (book review). The American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 995–998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Augustyn, P. Animal Studies in the Language Sciences. Biosemiotics 11, 121–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9313-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9313-3