, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 417–433 | Cite as

Semiosis as Individuation: Integration of Multiple Orders of Magnitude

  • Vefa Karatay
  • Yagmur DenizhanEmail author
  • Mehmet Ozansoy


This paper proposes Gilbert Simondon’s ontogenetic theory of individuation as an overarching framework for multilevel semiosis. What renders this theory suitable for this role is the fact that it shares a significant part of its heritage with biosemiotics, which provides compatibility between them. Unlike many philosophers who have worked on individuation, Simondon envisages a general process of individuation that starts with a metastable preindividual. This process ultimately constitutes an axiomatisation of ontogenesis and manifests itself in three basic modes: physical, vital and psycho-collective. In any of these modes a transductive operation is at work resolving the disparities of the preindividual whereby new structures emerge. Depending on the mode of individuation, the emerging structures can create new disparities that ask for further individuation. Simondon refers to such conversion of structure to operation and vice versa as allagmatics. He also extends his theory to scientific methodology establishing a healthy balance between reductionism and holism. His theory can be used to amend Peircean metaphysics to improve its compatibility with contemporary scientific discourse.


Individuation Transduction Ontogenesis Allagmatics Semiosis 


  1. Denizhan, Y. (2014). Towards a Mediation-Based Engineering. In EMCSR 2014 Book of Abstracts. The 22nd European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vienna. 22–25 April, 2014. Eds.: J. Wilby, S. Blachfellner, W. Hofkirchner, open access book licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International License, (pp. 411–415).Google Scholar
  2. Dinan, T. G., Stilling, R. M., Stanton, C., & Cryan, J. F. (2015). Collective unconscious: how gut microbes shape human behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 63, 1–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fóti, V. M. (2013). Tracing Expression in Merleau-Ponty: Aesthetics, Philosophy of Biology, and Ontology. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hansen, M. B. N. (2005). The Embryology of the (In)visible. In T. Carman & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. (pp. 231–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hansen, M.B.N. (2009). System-Environment Hybrids. In Emergence and Embodiment: New Essays on Second-Order Systems Theory. Eds. B. Clarke & M.B.N. Hansen, Duke University Press, Durham (pp. 113–142)Google Scholar
  6. Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Evolutionary Intentionality. In Proceedings from The Third European Conference on Systems Science, Rome. 1.-4. Oct. 1996. Eds.: E. Pessa, A. Montesanto, and M.P.Penna, Rom: Edzioni Kappa (pp. 699–703).Google Scholar
  7. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). The semiotic body. Biosemiotics, 1, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Tr. Alphonso Lingis: Northwestern University Press, Evanston.Google Scholar
  9. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). 1945]). Phenomenology of Perception. Tr. Colin smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Nature: Course Notes from the College de France. Tr. Robert Vallier: Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
  11. Mills, S. (2014). PhD thesis. Gilbert Simondon: Causality, ontogenesis & technology. EngD, University of the West of England.Google Scholar
  12. Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 1 (1867–93). Ed. N. Houser and C. Kloesel. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  13. Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913). Ed. Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  14. Simondon, G. (1964). L’individu et sa genese physico-biologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires De France.Google Scholar
  15. Simondon, G. (1989). L’individuation psychique et collective. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
  16. Simondon, G. (2005). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.Google Scholar
  17. Simondon, G. (2009a). The Position of the Problem of Ontogenesis. Tr. Gregory Flanders. Parrhesia, 1(7), 4–16.Google Scholar
  18. Simondon, G. (2009b). Technical Mentality. Tr. Arne De Boever. Parrhesia, 1(7), 17–27.Google Scholar
  19. Toscano, A. (2006). The Theatre of Production: Philosophy and Individuation between Kant and Deleuze (1st ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Electrical and Electronics Engineering DepartmentBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Physiology, Faculty of MedicineIstanbul Medipol UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations