The Origin of Cellular Life and Biosemiotics
Recent successes of systems biology clarified that biological functionality is multilevel. We point out that this fact makes it necessary to revise popular views about macromolecular functions and distinguish between local, physico-chemical and global, biological functions. Our analysis shows that physico-chemical functions are merely tools of biological functionality. This result sheds new light on the origin of cellular life, indicating that in evolutionary history, assignment of biological functions to cellular ingredients plays a crucial role. In this wider picture, even if aggregation of chance mutations of replicator molecules and spontaneously self-assembled proteins led to the formation of a system identical with a living cell in all physical respects but devoid of biological functions, it would remain an inanimate physical system, a pseudo-cell or a zombie-cell but not a viable cell. In the origin of life scenarios, a fundamental circularity arises, since if cells are the minimal units of life, it is apparent that assignments of cellular functions require the presence of cells and vice versa. Resolution of this dilemma requires distinguishing between physico-chemical and biological symbols as well as between physico-chemical and biological information. Our analysis of the concepts of symbol, rule and code suggests that they all rely implicitly on biological laws or principles. We show that the problem is how to establish physico-chemically arbitrary rules assigning biological functions without the presence of living organisms. We propose a solution to that problem with the help of a generalized action principle and biological harnessing of quantum uncertainties. By our proposal, biology is an autonomous science having its own fundamental principle. The biological principle ought not to be regarded as an emergent phenomenon. It can guide chemical evolution towards the biological one, progressively assigning greater complexity and functionality to macromolecules and systems of macromolecules at all levels of organization. This solution explains some perplexing facts and posits a new context for thinking about the problems of the origin of life and mind.
KeywordsMolecular functions Cellular functions Systems biology Physical symbols Biological symbols Quantum vacuum Emergence Supervenience Mind
- Albrecht-Buehler, G. (2009). ‘Cell intelligence’. Available at http://www.basic.northwestern.edu/g-buehler/FRAME.HTM [15 July 2012].
- Barbieri, M. (2008). Life is semiosis. The biosemiotic view of nature. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 4(1–2), 29–52. http://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/99/198.
- Barbieri, M. (2012). The paradigms of biology. Biosemiotics, April 2012, 1–27.Google Scholar
- Bauer, E. (1967). Theoretical biology. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. in Hungarian. 1967; in Russian, 1935, 1982, 1993, 2002.Google Scholar
- Berridge, M. J. (2012). Cell Signalling Biology, doi:10.1042/csb0001001.
- Boi, L. (2010). Méthodes mathématiques, processus biologiques et philosophie de la nature. Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, VI(35), 267–297.Google Scholar
- Buller, D. J. (2002). Function and teleology. In Encycl. Life Sci. (p. 393). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- ‘code’, 2012, entry, Oxford English Dictionary.Google Scholar
- Cruzeiro-Hansson, L. (2001). How do proteins work? Proc. First European Workshop on Exo/Astro-Biology. Frascati 21–23 May 2001. ESA SP-496.Google Scholar
- Davies, P. (1999). The fifth miracle. The search for the origin of life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Grandpierre, A. (2007). Biological extension of the action principle: endpoint determination beyond the quantum level and the ultimate physical roots of consciousness. Neuroquantology, 5, 346–362.Google Scholar
- Grandpierre, A. (2012). “Genuine biological autonomy: How can the spooky finger of mind play on the physical keyboard of the brain?” Athens: ATINER’S Conference Paper Series, No: PHI2012-0197. http://www.atiner.gr/papers/PHI2012-0197.pdf.
- Grandpierre, A., & Kafatos, M. (2012). Biological autonomy. Philosophy Study, 2(9), 631–649.Google Scholar
- Green, E. R. (2012). Entry: “Biology.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica.Google Scholar
- Harold, F. M. (2001). The way of the cell. Molecules, organisms and the order of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer, J. (1998). Surfaces inside surfaces: on the origin of agency and life. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 5(1), 33–42.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer, J. (1999). Order out of indeterminacy. Semiotica, 127, 321–343.Google Scholar
- Kawade, Y. (1992). A molecular semiotic view of biology. Interferon and ‘homeokine’ as symbols. Rivista di Biologia–Biology Forum, 85(1), 71–78.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Mona, A. E.-H., Sahar, A. E.-D., Sohayla, M. A., Nermin, A. H., & Sobhy, E. H. (2008). The relationship between postmortem interval and DNA degradation in different tissues of drowned rats. Mansoura Journal Forensic Medicine & Clinical Toxicology, XVI, 45–61. http://medfac.mans.edu.eg/english/forensic/july2008/S.%203_.pdf.
- Pályi, G., Zucchi, C., & Caglioti, L. (Eds.). (2002). Fundamentals of life. Paris: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Pattee, H. H. (1973). The physical basis and origin of hierarchical control. In H. H. Pattee (Ed.), Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems (pp. 73–108). New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
- Pattee, H. H. (1969) Physical Conditions for Primitive Functional Hierarchies. In L. L. Whyte, A. G. Wilson & D. Wilson (Eds.), Hierarchical Structures (pp. 161–177) New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Pattee, H. H., & Kull, K. (2009). A biosemiotic conversation: between physics and semiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 37(1–2), 311–331.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, R. (1986). Origins: A Sceptic’s guide to the creation of life on earth (pp. 186–187). New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, J. A. (2009). Revisiting the central dogma in the 21st Century. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1178, 6–28.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, J. A. (2011). Evolution: A view from the 21st century. FTPress Science.Google Scholar
- Steinman, G., & Cole, M. (1967). Synthesis of biologically pertinent peptides under possible primordial conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 58, 735.Google Scholar
- Tachibana, C., White, A., Johnson, N. A. (2010). Rediscovering biology. Proteins and Proteomics. http://www.learner.org/courses/biology/textbook/proteo/proteo_4.html.
- Toepfer, G. (2012). Teleology and its constitutive role for biology as the science of organized systems in nature. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 113–119.Google Scholar