Skip to main content
Log in

Subjects and Objects: Metaphysics, Biology, Consciousness, and Cognition

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past half-century, the Freeman laboratory has accumulated a large volume of data and a correspondingly extensive interpretive framework centered around an alternative perspective on brain function, that of dynamical systems. The purpose of this paper is first briefly to summarise this work, and bring it into dialogue with other perspectives. The contents of consciousness are seen as an inevitably sparse sample of events in the perception–action cycle. The paper proceeds to an attempt to elucidate the contents of this sparse sample. A critical concept is that of selfhood, and how it presents itself phenomenologically. It is argued that our experience of selfhood is an artifact of the necessity of preservation of subject/object relations. As this part of metaphysics has been badly misunderstood, we scrutinise it at some length in quantum mechanics, biology, and cognition. It is argued that Pattee's approach, while valuable, tends to premature closure on these issues. The paper then proceeds to outline a view on how selfhood is best considered wrt the immune response. This is interrelated with phenomenology, and some data are adduced to support this central hypothesis. Finally, consequences for the social sciences in general are hinted at.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balazs, A. (2004). Is there a molecular ‘Nirvana Principle?’. Biosystems, 77, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S. (2005). ‘Live memory’ of the cell, the other hereditary memory of living systems. Biosystems, 80, 251–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.-M., & Lo, P.-C. (2005). Meditation EEG interpretation. Biomedical Engineering Applications Basis Communication, 17, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, R. (1999). How the brain creates the mind. Scientific American, 267(3), 88–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (1975) Mass action in the nervous system. New York: Academic. Electronic 2004: http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/MANSWWW/MANSWWW.html

  • Freeman, W. J. (2000). Neurodynamics: An exploration of mesoscopic brain dynamics. London UK: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (2002). How and why brains create meaning from sensory information. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 14(2), 515–530, (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2005a). A field-theoretic approach to understanding scale-free neocortical dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 92(6), 350–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2005b). William James on consciousness, revisited. Chaos and Complexity Letters, 1(1), 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2006). Origin, structure, and role of background EEG activity. Part 4. Neural frame simulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 572–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (2007). Proposed cortical ‘shutter’ in cinematographic perception. In R. Kozma, & L. Perlovsky (Eds.), Neurodynamics of cognition and consciousness. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J., Holmes, M. D., West, G. A., & Vanhatalo, S. (2006). Fine spatiotemporal structure of phase in human intracranial EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(6), 1228–1243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J., & Vitiello, G. (2006). Nonlinear brain dynamics as macroscopic manifestation of underlying many-body field dynamics. Physics of Life Reviews, 3, 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. (1995). Consciousness and the cerebral hemispheres. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1391–1400). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B. (1994). Neurophysiology of consciousness: Selected papers and new essays. Boston MA: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1942/1963). The structure of behavior [Fischer AL, Trans.]. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception [C Smith, Trans.]. New York: Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Nualláin, S. (Ed.) (2000). Spatial cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Ó Nualláin, S. (2003). The search for mind. Exeter: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Nualláin, S. (2004). Being human: The search for order (2nd ed.). Exeter: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Nualláin, S., & Strohman, R. (2007). Genome and natural language: How far can the analogy be extended? In G. Witzany (Ed.), Proceedings of biosemiotics 2006 (pp. 249–260). Finland: Tartu University Press, Umweb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. (2001). The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut. Biosystems, 60(1–3), 5–21, May.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perelson, A. (1988). Theoretical immunology. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, H. (1993). Mind, matter and quantum mechanics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, G. (2006). Panpsychism? Reply to commentators and a celebration of Descartes. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(10–11), 184–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohman, R. (2000). Organization becomes cause in the matter. Nature biotechnology, 18, 575–576, June.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strohman, R. (2003). Thermodynamics—old laws in medicine and complex disease. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 477–78, May.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. (1997). Historical and philosophical perspectives concerning immune cognition. Journal of the history of biology, 30, 419–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. (2006). The biological notion of self and non-self. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/biology-self/>

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, England: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirassa, M., Carassa, A., & Geminiani, G. (2000). A theoretical framework for the study of spatial cognition. In S., & Ó Nualláin (Eds.), Spatial cognition. Foundations and applications (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veech, R. L., Chance, B., Kashiwaya, Y., Lardy, H., & Cahill, G. (2001). Ketone bodies, potential therapeutic uses. IUMB Life, 51, 241–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. (1955). The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Funding for salaries and all equipment used, including Matlab and hardware, is courtesy of Nous research, Dublin, Ireland, a not-for-profit private research company. Many thanks also to an anonymous reviewer, and to Marcello Barbieri for helpful insights, and encouragement delivered with Italian “finezza”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seán Ó. Nualláin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ó. Nualláin, S. Subjects and Objects: Metaphysics, Biology, Consciousness, and Cognition. Biosemiotics 1, 239–251 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9016-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9016-2

Keywords

Navigation