Geosciences Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 121–130 | Cite as

Interactive effect of soil moisture and temperature regimes on the dynamics of soil organic carbon decomposition in a subarctic tundra soil

  • Hee-Myong Ro
  • Yoonmi Ji
  • Bangyong Lee


Geomorphic disturbances to surrounding terrain induced by thermal degradation of permafrost often lead to surface ponding or soil saturation. However, interactions between soil moisture and temperature on belowground carbon processes are not fully understood. We conducted batch incubation for three temperature treatments [constant freezing (CF), constant thawing (CT), and fluctuating temperatures (FTC)] and two soil moisture conditions (ponded and unsaturated). Extracellular enzyme activity was higher under ponded conditions than under unsaturated conditions, resulting in higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC) levels for ponded conditions. More CO2 and less CH4 were emitted under unsaturated conditions than under ponded conditions. Carbon dioxide emission was similar for CT and FTC treatments regardless of moisture conditions. However, CH4 emission was higher under ponded conditions than under unsaturated conditions for CT treatments, but was very low for FTC treatments regardless of moisture conditions. Little CO2 and CH4 were produced in CF treatments. Despite similar CO2 and CH4 emission levels for CT and FTC treatments, lower DOC levels were observed in the latter, indicating slower soil organic carbon (SOC) decomposition. Similar DOC variation patterns between CT and CF treatments indicated that SOC decomposition was considerable and further degradation to CO2 or CH4 was negligible even for CF treatments. The SOC decomposition and CO2 and CH4 emissions were considerable for FTC treatments. Our results suggest that labile-C produced during SOC decomposition in seasonally frozen soils and permafrost may provide supplemental substrates that would enhance the positive feedback to climate change with rising temperatures and wetter conditions.

Key words

dissolved organic carbon (DOC) extracellular enzyme activity greenhouse gases (GHGs) soil organic carbon subarctic tundra Thermokarst pond 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ågren, A., Berggren, M., Laudon, H., and Jansson, M., 2008, Terrestrial export of highly bioavailable carbon from small boreal catchments in spring floods. Freshwater Biology, 53, 964–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anisimov, O.A., Vaughan, D.G., Callaghan, T.V., Furgal, C., Marchant, H., Prowse, T.D., Vilhjálmsson, H., and Walsh, J.E., 2007, Polar regions (arctic and antarctic). Climate Change, 15, 653–685.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, K., Seibert, J., Nyberg, L., and Rodhe, A., 2011, Water storage in a till catchment. II: Implications of transmissivity feedback for flow paths and turnover times. Hydrological Processes, 25, 3950–3959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blagodatskaya, E., Blagodatsky, S., Khomyakov, N., Myachina, O., and Kuzyakov, Y., 2016, Temperature sensitivity and enzymatic mechanisms of soil organic matter decomposition along an altitudinal gradient of Mount Kilimanjaro. Scientific Reports, 6, 22240. DOI 10.1038/srep22240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, L.I., Tveit, A., Øvreås, L., Head, I.M., and Gray, N.D., 2015, Response of methanogens in Arctic sediments to temperature and methanogenic substrate availability. PLoS One, 10, e0129733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Box, J., 1983, Investigation of the Folin-Ciocalteau phenol reagent for the determination of polyphenolic substances in natural waters. Water Research, 17, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, M.A., Keiser, A.D., Davies, C.A., Mersmann, C.A., and Strickland, M.S., 2013, Empirical evidence that soil carbon formation from plant inputs is positively related to microbial growth. Biogeochemistry, 113, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carreiro, M., Sinsabaugh, R., Repert, D., and Parkhurst, D., 2000, Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology, 81, 2359–2365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, L., Liang, J., Qin, S., Liu, L., Fang, K., Xu, Y., Ding, J., Li, F., Luo, Y., and Yang, Y., 2016, Determinants of carbon release from the active layer and permafrost deposits on the Tibetan Plateau. Nature Communication, 7, 13046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalal, R.C. and Allen, D.E., 2008, Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems, Australian Journal of Botany, 56, 369–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson E.A. and Janssens, I.A., 2006, Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filippi, P., Minasny, B., Cattle, S.R., and Bishop, T.F.A., 2016, Monitoring and modeling soil change: the influence of human activity and climatic shifts on aspect of soil spatiotemporally–a review. Advances in Agronomy, 139, 153–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Folin, O. and Ciocalteu, V., 1927, On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 73, 627–650.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, C., Ostle, N., and Kang, H., 2001, An enzymic ‘latch’ on a global carbon store: a shortage of oxygen locks up carbon in peatlands by restraining a single enzymes. Nature, 409, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geigenberger, P., Geiger, M., and Stitt, M., 1998, High-temperature perturbation of starch synthesis is attributable to inhibition of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase by decreased levels of glycerate-3-phosphate in growing potato tubers. Plant Physiology, 117, 1307–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grogan, P., Michelsen, A., Ambus, P., and Jonasson, S., 2004, Freezethaw regime effects on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in sub-arctic heath tundra mesocosms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grosse, G., Romanovsky, V., Jorgenson, T., Anthony, K.W., Brown, J., Overduin, P.P., and Wegener, A., 2011, Vulnerability and feedbacks of permafrost to climate change. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 92, 73–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, S.J., Treffkorn, J., and Silver, W.L., 2014, Breaking the enzymatic latch: impacts of reducing conditions on hydrolytic enzyme activity in tropical forest soils. Ecology, 95, 2964–2973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hättenschwiler, S. and Vitousek, P.M., 2000, The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorgenson, M.T., Shur, Y.L., and Pullman, E.R., 2006, Abrupt increase in permafrost degradation in Arctic Alaska. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L02503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keiblinger, K. M., Schneider, T., Roschitzki, B., Schmid, E., Eberl, L., Hämmerle, I., Leitner, S., Richter, A., Wanek, W., Riedel, K., and Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., 2012, Effects of stoichiometry and temperature perturbations on beech leaf litter decomposition, enzyme activities and protein expression. Biogeosciences, 9, 4537–4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, Y., Nishina, K., Chae, N., Park, S.J., Yoon, Y.J., and Lee, B.Y., 2014, Constraint of soil moisture on CO2 efflux from tundra lichen, moss, and tussock in Council, Alaska, using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Biogeosciences, 11, 5567–5579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koven, C.D., Ringeval, B., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Cadule, P., Khvorostyanov, D., Krinner, G., and Tarnocai, C., 2011, Permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 14769–14774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehmeier, C.A., Min, K., Niehues, N.D., Ballantyne, F., IV, and Billings, S.A., 2013, Temperature-mediated changes of exoenzyme-substrate reaction rates and their consequences for the carbon to nitrogen flow ratio of liberated resources. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 57, 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mack, M.C., Schuur, E.A.G., Bret-Harte, M.S., Shaver, G.R., and Chapin, F.S., III., 2004, Ecosystem carbon storage in Arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature, 431, 440–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nowinski, N.S., Trumbore, S.E., Schuur, E.A.G., Mack, M.C., and Shaver, G.R., 2008, Nutrient addition prompts rapid destabilization of organic matter in an Arctic tundra ecosystem. Ecosystems, 11, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsson, L., Ye, S., Yu, X., Wei, M., Krauss, K.W., and Brix, H., 2015, Factors influencing CO2 and CH4 emissions from coastal wetlands in the Liaohe Delta, Northeast China. Biogeosciences, 12, 4965–4977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paré, D., Boutin, R., Larocque, G.R., and Raulier, F., 2006, Effect of temperature on soil organic matter decomposition in three forest biomes of Eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 86, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Park, J.-S. and Lee, E.-J., 2014, Geostatistical analyses and spatial distribution patterns of tundra vegetation in Council, Alaska. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 37, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pind, A., Freeman, C., and Lock, M.A., 1994, Enzymic degradation of phenolic materials in peatlands–measurement of phenol oxidase activity. Plant and Soil, 159, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ping, C.-L., Michaelson, G.J., Jorgenson, M.T., Kimble, J.M., Epstein, H., Romanovsky, V.E., and Walker, D.A., 2008, High stocks of soil organic carbon in the North American Arctic region. Nature Geoscience, 1, 615–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poffenbarger, H.J., Needelman, B.A., and Megonigal, J.P., 2011, Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands, 31, 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Razavi, B.S., Blagodatskaya, E., and Kuzyakov, Y., 2015, Nonlinear temperature sensitivity of enzyme kinetics explains canceling effect–a case study on loamy haplic Luvisol, Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Razavi, B.S., Liu, S., and Kuzyakov, Y., 2017, Hot experience for coldadapted microorganisms: Temperature sensitivity of soil enzymes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 105, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowland, J.C., Jones, C.E., Altmann, G., Bryan, R., Crosby, B.T., Hinzman, L.D., Kane, D.L., Lawrence, D.M., Mancino, A., Marsh, P., McNamara, J.P., Romanvosky, V.E., Toniolo, H., Travis, B.J., Trochim, E., Wilson, C.J., and Geernaert, G.L., 2010, Arctic landscapes in transition: responses to thawing permafrost. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 91, 229–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schuur, E.A.G., Abbott, B., Bowden, W., Brovkin, V., Camill, P., Canadell, J., Chanton, J., Chapin, F., Christensen, T., and Ciais, P., 2013, Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change. Climatic Change, 119, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schuur, E.A.G., Vogel, J.G., Crummer, K.G., Lee, H., Sickman, J.O., and Osterkamp, T., 2009, The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra. Nature, 459, 556–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sierra, C.A., Malghani, S., and Loescher, H.W., 2017, Interactions among temperature, moisture, and oxygen concentrations in controlling decomposition rates. Biogeosciences, 14, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinsabaugh, R.L., Lauber, C.L., Weintraub, M.N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S.D., Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A.R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M.E., Gartner, T.B., Hobbie, S.E., Holland, K., Keeler, B.L., Powers, J.S., Stursova, M., Takacs-Vesbach, C., Waldrop, M.P., Wallenstein, M.D., Zak, D.R., and Zeglin, L.H., 2008, Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters, 11, 1252–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2010, Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, K.A., Ball T., Conen, F., Dobbie, K.E., Massheder, J., and Rey, A., 2003, Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. European Journal of Soil Science, 54, 779–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thauer, R.K., Kaster, A.-K., Seedorf, H., Buckel, W., and Hedderich, R., 2008, Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 6, 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toniolo, H., Kodial, P., Hinzman, L.D., and Yoshikawa, K., 2009, Spatio-temporal evolution of a thermokarst in interior Alaska. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 56, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Bodegom, P.M., Broekman, R., van Dijk, J., Bakker, C., and Aerts, R., 2005, Ferrous iron stimulates phenol oxidase activity and organic matter decomposition in waterlogged wetlands. Biogeochemistry, 76, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, J.S., Dungait, J.A.J., Bol, R., and Abbott, G.D., 2016, Contrasting temperature responses of dissolved organic carbon and phenols leached from soils. Plant and Soil, 399, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoshikawa, K. and Hinzman, L.D., 2003, Shrinking thermokarst ponds and groundwater dynamics in discontinuous permafrost near Council, Alaska. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 14, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yun, S.-I. and Ro, H.-M., 2014, Can nitrogen isotope fractionation reveal ammonia oxidation responses to varying soil moisture? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 76, 136–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yvon-Durocher, G., Allen, A.P., Bastviken, D., Conrad, R., Gudasz, C., St-Pierre, A., Thanh-Duc, N., and del Giorgio, P.A., 2014, Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales. Nature, 507, Pages: 488–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Division of Polar Climate SciencesKorea Polar Research InstituteIncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations