Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geostatistical modelling as an assessment tool of soil pollution based on deposition from atmospheric air

  • Review
  • Published:
Geosciences Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research in the scope of geostatistics is applied in many fields of study, including soils and atmospheric air. Geostatistics can constitute a tool for interpretation of results of research on the natural environment. For example, the semivariogram permits the estimation and analysis of the variability structure of selected phenomena. Stochastic interpolation techniques allow for obtaining the value of the studied variable with no necessity of field studies with consideration of a dense network of measurements owing to information obtained from other research. Research on the quality of atmospheric air conducted by the European Environmental Agency (EEA) presents the state and forecasts of atmospheric air in particular European countries based on a low number of measurement points throughout Europe. In Poland, only four measurement stations function in the scope of the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP). An important aspect in geostatistical modelling is later assessment of uncertainty as to the estimated value of the analysed variable. Results of such an assessment are usually presented in the form of a map of probability of exceeding critical values. The last stage of geostatistical modelling usually involves stochastic simulations performed by means of an increasingly broad range of available algorithms. The assessment of generated effects combined with expert knowledge permits e.g., the identification of polluted areas. The quality of atmospheric air affects the degree of soil pollution (primarily as a result of the phenomenon of dry and/or wet deposition). Due to this, it is necessary to analyse such impact with consideration of all environmental and geochemical conditions. The application of the generally available data permits the estimation of the degree of soil pollution with no necessity of sampling in a given place, or performing costly laboratory analyses. The aim of the study was the presentation of the commonly used geostatistical methods and good practices in geostatistical modelling for the assessment of soil contamination by heavy metals based on deposition data from atmospheric air. The work was divided into two parts: (i) geostatistical modelling, presenting individual stages of the use of various tools and techniques, as well as (ii) kriging and cokriging interpolation methods used as a tool to integrate spatial data from different sets. The workflow in geostatistical modelling in environmental sciences using existing data sets was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Government, Department Agricultural, 2013, http://www.daff. gov.au/abares/aclump/pages/about-aclump.aspx [Accessed on Sept. 11, 2014].

  • Barnes, R., 2008, Variogram Tutorial. Golden Software Inc., Golden, 23 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A. and Si, B.C., 2013, Model averaging for semivariogram model parameters. In: Grundas, S. (ed.), Advances in Agrophysical Research. InTech, Croatia, p. 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohling, G., 2005, Introduction to geostatistics and variogram analysis. http://people.ku.edu/~gbohling/cpe940/Variograms.pdf [Accessed on Oct. 22, 2015].

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenning, A., 2001, Geostatistics without Stationarity Assumptions within Geographical Information Systems. Freiberg Online Geoscience, 6, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, P.H. and Rechberger, H., 2016, Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 336 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T., Shyu, G., Lin, Y., and Chan, N., 1999, Geostatistical analysis of soil arsenic content in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 34, 1485–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D., Draxler, R.R., and Artz, R., 2000, Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of PCDD/F to the Great Lakes. Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, 99 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A.C., 1993, Statistics for spatial data. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, 928 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felgueiras, C., Camargo, E., and Ortiz, J., 2014, Geostatistical anisotropic modeling of carbon dioxide emissions in the Brazilian Negro. Anais 5º Simpósio de Geotecnologias no Pantanal, Campo Grande, Nov. 22–26, p. 896–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, D., Skiba, U., Nemitz, E., Choubedar, F., Branford, D., Donovan, R., and Rowland, P., 2004, Measuring aerosol and heavy metal deposition on urban woodland and grass using inventories of 210Pb and metal concentrations in soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus, 4, 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, J., Egodawatta, P., Ayoko, G.A., and Goonetilleke, A., 2013, Atmospheric deposition as a source of heavy metals in urban stormwater. Atmospheric Environment, 68, 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzehpour, N., Eghbal, M.K., Bogaert, P., Toomanian, M., and Sokouti, R.S., 2013, Spatial prediction of soil salinity using kriging with measurement errors and probabilistic soft data. Arid Land Research and Management, 27, 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R.M. and Laxen, D.P.H., 1981, Lead Pollution: Causes and Control. Chapman and Hall, Norwell, 168 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl, T., 2007, A Practical Guide to Geostatistical. Mapping of Environmental Variables. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, Ispra, 293 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias, A., 1991, Determination of the “background” of content of trace metals in soils. Krajowa Konferencja, “Geologiczne aspekty ochrony srodowiska”, Wydawnictwo AGH, Kraków, p. 25–29. (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias, A. and Pendias, H., 1993, Biochemistry of trace elements. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, p. 53–59. (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, K.S., Lee, J., Kim, J., and Lee, J., 2009, Assessments of natural and anthropogenic controls on the spatial distribution of stream water quality in Southeastern Korea. Geosciences Journal, 13, 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivoruchko, K., 2014, Using multivariate interpolation for estimating well performance. Esri, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, 11 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowska-Malina, J. and Borkowski, A.Sz., 2015, Analysis of atmospheric air pollution deposition to soil environment: the masovian voivodeship case study. Proceedings of V. I, Informatics, Geoinformatics, Photogrametry and Remote Sensing, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference & EXPO SGEM, June 18–24, 1, p. 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, S., Sorensen, R., Stendahl, J., and Seibert, J., 2010, Using landscape characteristics to define anadjusted distance metric for improving kriging interpolations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 723–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Q., Liu, Z., and Borders, B., 2013, Assessment of regression kriging for spatial interpolation–comparisons of seven GIS interpolation methods. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40, 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T., 1989, Chapter 6: Atmospheric occurrence of organolead compounds. In: Grandjean, P. (ed.), Biological Effects of Organolead Compounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea, R., 2009, A Practical Primer on Geostatistics. Open-file report, USGS, Reston, 348 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omuto, C. and Vargas, R., 2015, Re-tooling of regression kriging in R for improved digital mapping of soil properties. Geosciences Journal, 19, 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papritz, A. and Dubois, J.P., 1999, Mapping heavy metals in soil by (non-) linear kriging: an empirical validation. In: Gómez-Hernandez, J. et al. (eds.), geoENV II-Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 429–440.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robeson, S., 1997, Spherical methods for spatial interpolation: review and evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 24, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., Roy, A., and Martha, T., 2013, Soil depth estimation through soil-landscape modelling using regression kriging in a Himalayan terrain. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27, 2436–2454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi, M., Jafarzadeh, A., Neyshabouri, M., Ghorbani, M., and Kamran, K., 2016, Spatial modeling of soil salinity using multiple linear regression. Ordinary kriging and artificial neural network methods. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62, 1476–3567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprovieri, M., Sammartino, S., Salvagio, Manta D., Marsella, E., and Ferraro, L., 2007, Heavy metals in top core sediments from the southern Campania shelf (Italy): hints to define large-scale geochemical backgrounds. Chemistry and Ecology, 22, 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, B.V., Duraiswami, R., and Murtugudde, R., 2010, Efficient kriging for real-time spatio-temporal interpolation. 20th Conference on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences, Atlanta, Jan. 18–21, p. 228–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stach, A., 2007, Temporal variability of the spatial structure of maximum daily precipitation totals. Monitoring Srodowiska Przyrodniczego, 8, 73–90. (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Guzman, J.A. and Jim Yeh, T.C., 1999, Sequential kriging and cokriging: two powerful geostatistical approaches. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 13, 416–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasilewska, M. and Mucha, J., 2005, Kriging as a method of interpolation of parameters describing the quality of hard coal in deposits of GZW. Zagrozenia naturalne w górnictwie, p. 341–354. (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. and Oliver, M., 2007, Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists (2nd edition). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 309 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Witten, I. and Frank, E., 2005, Data Mining. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 525 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z. and Lima, L., 2007, Testing covariance stationarity. Econometric Reviews, 26, 643–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçin, E., 2005, Cokriging and its effect on the estimation precision. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 105, 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.S., Kao, S.P., Lee, F.B., and Hung, P.S., 2004, Twelve different interpolation methods: A Case Study of Surfer 8.0. Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and remote Sensing, XX congress, Istanbul, July 12–23, 35–B2, p. 772–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zare Chahouki, M.A., Zare Chahouki, A., Malekiana, A., Bagheric, R., and Vesali, S.A., 2014, Evaluation of different cokriging methods for rainfall estimation in arid regions (Central Kavir Basin in Iran). Desert, 19–1, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawadzki, J., 2011, Geostatistical methods for environmental and technical studies. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, 125 p. (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spatial Planning and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Politechniki 1 Sq. 00-661, Warsaw, Poland

    Andrzej Sz. Borkowski & Jolanta Kwiatkowska-Malina

Authors
  1. Andrzej Sz. Borkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jolanta Kwiatkowska-Malina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrzej Sz. Borkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borkowski, A.S., Kwiatkowska-Malina, J. Geostatistical modelling as an assessment tool of soil pollution based on deposition from atmospheric air. Geosci J 21, 645–653 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0005-9

Key words

Search

Navigation