Abstract
This paper presents the hydraulic interaction between aquifer and river related with bank storage. A convolution equation was used to analyze the aquifer response, discharge, and bank storage due to river stage fluctuation. River stages were generated to describe flood peak, asymmetry, and duration. The simulation results suggest that the geometry of flood hydrograph can play an important role in affecting the discharge and bank storage. The presented model was applied to a field data, and the site is a floodplain aquifer of the Mangyeong River. Aquifer responses for the various flood duration and flood peak were observed at the site, which is well matched with the simulated results. A model parameter, the riverbed leakance was determined from calibration with the simulated and observed groundwater levels. After the determination of each parameter, the discharge and bank storage can be calculated. The presented method is a good tool to assess the hydraulic interaction between the aquifer and the river, as arbitrary river stage fluctuations are used. The limitation of the method is that the actual discharge and bank storage can be different from the calculated ones, when significant regional groundwater gradient exists. It also can be a useful tool before applying more complex numerical models. Key words: bank storage, aquifer diffusivity, river-aquifer interaction, riverbed leakance, Mangyeong River
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carslaw, H.S., and Jaeger, J.C., 1959, Conduction of Heat in Solids. Oxford University Press, London, 510p.
Barlow, P.M., and Moench, A.F., 1998, Analytical solutions and computer programs for hydraulic interaction of stream-aquifer systems. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-415A, 85p.
Barlow, P.M., DeSimone, L.A., and Moench, A.F., 2000, Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations II. Convolution method and applications. Journal of Hydrology 230, 211–229.
Chen, Xi, and Chen, Xunhong, 2003, Stream water infiltration, bank storage, and storage zone changes due to stream-stage fluctuations. Journal of Hydrology, 280, 246–264.
Cooper, H.H., and Rorabaugh, M., 1963, Groundwater movements and bank storage due to flood stages in surface stream. US Geol. Survey, Water Supply Paper 1536-J, p343–366.
Hall F.R., and Moench, A.F., 1972, Application of the convolution equation to stream-aquifer relationships. Water Resources Research, 8, 487–493.
Hantush, M.S., 1965, Wells near streams with semi-pervious beds. J. Geophys. Res., 10, 2829–2838.
Jha, M.K., Jayalekshmi, K., Machiwal, D., Kamii, Y., and Chikamori, K., 2004, Determination of hydraulic parameters of an unconfined alluvial aquifer by the floodwave-response technique. Hydrogeology Journal, 12, 628–642.
Pinder G.F., and Sauer S.P., 1971, Numerical simulation of flood wave modification due to bank storage effects. Water Resources Research, 7, 63–70.
Reynolds, R.J., 1987, Diffusivity of a glacial-outwash aquifer by the floodwave response technique. Ground Water, 25, 290–299.
Squillace, P.J., Thurman, E.M., and Furlong, E.T., 1993, Groundwater as a nonpoint source of atrazine and deethylatrazine in a river during a base-flow conditions. Water Resources Research, 29, 1719–1729.
Singh, K.P., 1968, Some factors affecting baseflow. Water Resources Research, 29, 985–999.
Todd, D.K., 1980, Groundwater Hydrogeology. Wiley, New York, 535p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ha, K., Koh, DC., Yum, BW. et al. Estimation of river stage effect on groundwater level, discharge, and bank storage and its field application. Geosci J 12, 191–204 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-008-0020-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-008-0020-y