Advertisement

Geosciences Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 107–122 | Cite as

Simulating complex flow and transport dynamics in an integrated surface-subsurface modeling framework

  • Edward A. Sudicky
  • Jon P. Jones
  • Young-Jin Park
  • Andrea E. Brookfield
  • Dennis Colautti
Article

Abstract

A fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow and transport model is applied to a 17 km2 subcatchment of the Laurel Creek Watershed within the Grand River basin in Southern Ontario, Canada. Through past and ongoing field studies, the subcatchment is reasonably well characterized and is being monitored on an ongoing basis. In addition to diverse land-usage and surface cover and more than 65 m of topographic relief, the watershed is underlain by a complex interconnected sequence of sand and gravel aquifers that are separated by discontinuous clayey aquitards. A steady-state condition was achieved in the model by calibrating the subsurface flow field to 16 observation wells where long-term hydraulic head data were available, while simultaneously establishing a level of baseflow discharge on the surface regime approximating the level observed at the beginning of the transient simulation period. The model is then subjected to several hundred hours of rainfall data and the resulting discharge hydrographs are compared with the measured hydrographs. The calculated subsurface hydraulic head distribution and surficial rainfall-runoff responses, respectively, were shown to agree moderately well with those observed in the system during this period. The impact of an upland surficial contaminant source discharging along a reach of a small stream within the subcatchment was also examined. Results showed that short-duration, high-intensity concentration peaks were not captured if annual or monthly average rainfall was used as input. The hydraulic head and concentration variations due to short-duration rainfall variations showed a muted response with increasing depth below the streambed due to the natural smoothing in the hydraulic response and to dispersion and diffusion of the solute, respectively. Discrete daily precipitation events were also found to cause rapid changes in the calculated water and solute exchange fluxes. The variability and sensitivity of these near-stream processes to the temporal resolution of rainfall input, specifically the concentration and solute exchange flux responses, may be significant in the prediction of health risks to aquatic habitats. Overall, it is concluded that the model is capable of reproducing surface and subsurface hydrodynamic processes at the subcatchment scale although the results could be better through improved parameterization of the subcatchment and the manner in which the model simulates evapotranspiration processes.

Key words

surface-subsurface fully-integrated Laurel Creek near-stream processes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O’Connell, P.E., and Rasmussen, J., 1986, An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique European, “SHE”, 2. Structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, D.L., 1995, An analysis of transient flow in upland watersheds: interactions between structure and process, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, California, 242 p.Google Scholar
  3. Environment Canada, 2003, Canadian Daily Climate Data, 1880–2000, Atmosphere and Environmental Services, Ontario.Google Scholar
  4. Ewen, J., Parkin, G., and O’Connell, P.E., 2000, SHETRAN: Distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system, J. of Hydrol. Eng., 5, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farvolden, R., Greenhouse, J., Karrow, P., Pehme, P., and Ross, L., 1987, Subsurface quaternary stratigraphy of the Kitchner-Waterloo area using borehole geophysics, Ontario Geoscience Research Grant Program, Grant No. 128.Google Scholar
  6. Freeze, R.A., 1972a, Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff, 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow, Water Resour. Res., 8, 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeze, R.A., 1972b, Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff, 2. Upstream source areas. Water Resour. Res., 8, 1272–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeze, R.A. and Harlan, R.L., 1969, Blueprint for a physically-based digitally-simulated hydrologic response model, J. of Hydrol., 9, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gautry, S., 1996, The hydrostratigraphy of the Waterloo Moraine, M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 308 p.Google Scholar
  10. Holden, K.M., Thomas, J., and Karrow, P.F., 1993, Bedrock topography, Stratford area, Southern Ontario, Mines and Minerals Division, Ontario Geological Survey, Map P-3211, scale 1:50000.Google Scholar
  11. HydroGeoLogic, 2000, MODHMS: A comprehensive MODFLOW-based hydrologic modeling system, version 1.1, code documentation and user’s guide, HydroGeoLogic Inc., Herndon, VA.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, J.P., Sudicky, E.A., Brookfield, A.E., and Park, Y.-J., 2006, An assessment of the tracer-based approach to quantifying groundwater contributions to streamflow, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02407, doi:10.1029/2005WR004130.Google Scholar
  13. Karrow, P.F., 1974, Till stratigraphy in parts of Southwestern Ontario, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 85, 761–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karrow, P.F., 1987, Quaternary geology of the Hamilton-Cambridge area, Ontario Geological Survey, Report 255, 94 p.Google Scholar
  15. Karrow, P.F., 1989, Quaternary geology of the Great Lakes Subregion, Chapter 4, in Quaternary Geology of Canada and Greenland, edited by R. Fulton, Geology of Canada, No. 1, Geological Survey of Canada, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  16. Karrow, P.F., 1993, Quaternary Geology, Stratford-Conestoga Area, Ontario Geological Survey, Report 283.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, P.K., 1967, Study of the engineering properties of Water County surficial soils. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar
  18. Leverett, M.C., 1942, Capillary behaviour in porous soils, Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., 142, 152–169.Google Scholar
  19. Loague, K. and VanderKwaak, J.E., 2002, Simulating hydrological response for the R-5 catchment: comparison of two models and the impact of the roads, Hydrol. Proc., 16, 1015–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loague, K., Heppner, C.S., Abrams, R.H., Carr, A.E., VanderKwaak, J.E., and Ebel, B.A., 2005, Further testing of the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma, Hydrol. Proc., 19, 1373–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin, P.J., 1994, Modeling of the North Waterloo multi-aquifer system, M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, P.J. and Frind, E.O., 1998, Modeling a complex multi-aquifer system: The Waterloo Moraine, Ground Water, 36, 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCuen, R., 1989, Hydrologic Analysis and Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Morita, M. and Yen, B.C., 2002, Modeling of Conjunctive Two-Dimensional Surface-Three-Dimensional Subsurface Flows, J. of Hydrol. Eng., 7, 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paloschi, G., 1993, Subsurface stratigraphy of the Waterloo Moraine, M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 153 p.Google Scholar
  26. Panday, S., and Huyakorn, P. S., 2004, A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow, Adv. Water Res., 27, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinder, G.F. and Sauer, S.P., 1971, Numerical solution of flood wave modification due to bank storage effects, Water Resour. Res., 7, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Presant, E.W. and Wickland, R.E., 1971, The Soils of Waterloo County, Ontario Soil Survey, Report 44.Google Scholar
  29. Radcliffe, A.J., 2000, Physical hydrogeology and the impact of urbanization at the Waterloo west side: a groundwater modelling approach, M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 152 p.Google Scholar
  30. Refsgaard, J.C., and Storm, B., 1996, MIKE SHE. In: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. V.J. Singh (ed.), Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.Google Scholar
  31. Ross, L., 1986, A quaternary stratigraphic cross-section through Kitchner-Waterloo, M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 53 p.Google Scholar
  32. Schroeder, P., Dozier, T., Zappi, P., McEnroe, B., Sjostrom, J., and Peyton, R., 1994, The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering Documentation for version 3. EPA/600/R-94/186b, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  33. Terraaqua Investigations, Ltd., 1993, Laurel Creek Watershed Study.Google Scholar
  34. Therrien, R., McLaren, R.G., Sudicky, E.A., Panday, S., DeMarco, D.T., Mantanga, G., and Huyakorn, P.S., 2004, User’s guide, HydroGeoSphere: A three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and overland flow and solute transport, Groundwater Simulations Group, Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar
  35. Tiedeman, C.R., Goode, D.J., and Hsieh, P.A., 1998, Characterizing a ground water basin in a New England mountain and valley terrain, Ground Water, 36, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. VanderKwaak, J.E., 1999, Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 217 p.Google Scholar
  37. VanderKwaak, J.E. and Loague, K., 2001, Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model, Water Resour. Res., 37, 999–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Sudicky
    • 1
  • Jon P. Jones
    • 1
  • Young-Jin Park
    • 1
  • Andrea E. Brookfield
    • 1
  • Dennis Colautti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations