Abstract
Vetiver [Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Roberty] is a perennial C-4 grass traditionally valued for its aromatic roots/root essential oil. Owing to its deep penetrating web-forming roots, the grass is now widely used across the globe for phytoremediation and the conservation of soil and water. This study has used the transcriptome data of vetiver roots in its two distinct geographic morphotypes (North Indian type A and South Indian type B) for reference gene(s) identification. Further, validation of reference genes using various abiotic stresses such as heat, cold, salt, and drought was carried out. The de novo assembly based on differential genes analysis gave 1,36,824 genes (PRJNA292937). Statistical tests like RefFinder, NormFinder, BestKeeper, geNorm, and Delta-Ct software were applied on 346 selected contigs. Eleven selected genes viz., GAPs, UBE2W, RP, OSCam2, MUB, RPS, Core histone 1, Core histone 2, SAMS, GRCWSP, PLDCP along with Actin were used for qRT-PCR analysis. Finally, the study identified the five best reference genes GAPs, OsCam2, MUB, Core histone 1, and SAMS along with Actin. The two optimal reference genes SAMS and Core histone 1 were identified with the help of qbase + software. The findings of the present analyses have value in the identification of suitable reference gene(s) in transcriptomic and molecular data analysis concerning various phenotypes related to abiotic stress and developmental aspects, as well as a quality control measure in gene expression experiments. Identifying reference genes in vetiver appears important as it allows for accurate normalization of gene expression data in qRT-PCR experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of the material
The target vetiver genotypes used in this study could be availed through UCL.
Change history
10 July 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-023-01330-8
References
Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64(15):5245–5250. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496
Boff SV, Friedel, A, Miertsch A, Quezada-Euan JJG et al (2018) A scientific note of housekeeping genes for the primitively eusocial bee Euglossa viridissima Friese (Apidae: Euglossini). Doi: https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i4.3428
Chakrabarty D, Chauhan PS, Chauhan AS, Indoliya Y, Lavania UC, Nautiyal CS (2015) De novo assembly and characterization of root transcriptome in two distinct morphotypes of vetiver, Chrysopogon zizaniodes (L.) Roberty. Sci Rep 5:18630. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18630
Chen J, Bao Z, Huang Y, Wang Z, Zhao Y (2020) Selection of suitable reference genes for qPCR gene expression analysis of HepG2 and L02 in four different liver cell injured models. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8926120
Danh LT, Truong P, Mammucari R, Tran T, Foster N (2009) Vetiver grass, Vetiveria zizanioides: a choice plant for phytoremediation of heavy metals and organic wastes. Int J Phytoremediation 11(8):664–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510902787302
Ding Y, Xu L, Jovanovic BD, Helenowski IB, Kelly DL, Catalona WJ, Yang XJ, Pins M, Bergan RC (2007) The methodology used to measure differential gene expression affects the outcome. J Biomol Tech 18(5):321–330
Dussert S, Guerin C, Andersson M, Joet T, Tranbarger TJ, Pizot M et al (2013) Comparative transcriptome analysis of three oil palm fruit and seed tissues that differ in oil content and fatty acid composition. Plant Physiol 162(3):1337–1358. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.220525
Zhiguo E, Zhang Y, Li T, Wang L, Zhao H (2015) Characterization of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene family in rice and evaluation of expression profiles under abiotic stresses and hormone treatments. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122621
Ezaki B, Higashi A, Nanba N, Nishiuchi T (2016) An S-adenosyl methionine synthetase (SAMS) gene from Andropogon virginicus L. confers aluminum stress tolerance and facilitates epigenetic gene regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 7:1627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01627
Garson JA, Grant PR, Ayliffe U, Ferns RB, Tedder RS (2005) Real-time PCR quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA using automated sample preparation and murine cytomegalovirus internal control. J Virol Methods 126(1–2):207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.03.001
Garrido J, Aguilar M, Prieto P (2020) Identification and validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR normalization in wheat meiosis. Sci Rep 10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59580-5
Gavira C, Watteau F, Lainé JM, Bourgaud F, Legendre L (2022) Evaluation of vetiver volatile compound production under aeroponic-grown conditions for the perfume industry. Molecules 27(6):1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061942
Ginzinger DG (2002) Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp Hematol 30(6):503–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00806-8
Giri A, Sundar IK (2022) Evaluation of stable reference genes for qPCR normalization in circadian studies related to lung inflammation and injury in mouse model. Sci Rep 12(1):1764
Gopalam R, Rupwate SD, Tumaney AW (2017) Selection and validation of appropriate reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in Salvia hispanica. PLoS ONE 12(11):e0186978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186978
Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L et al (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29(7):644–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883
Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8(2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19
Hossain MS, Ahmed R, Haque MS, Alam MM, Islam MS (2019) Identification and validation of reference genes for real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis in jute. BMC Mol Biol 20:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12867-019-0130-2
Kozera B, Rapacz M (2013) Reference genes in real-time PCR. J Appl Genet 54(4):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-013-0173-x
Li T, Yuan W, Qiu S, Shi J (2021) Selection of reference genes for gene expression analysis in Liriodendron hybrids’ somatic embryogenesis and germinative tissues. Sci Rep 11(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84518-w
Liang L, He Z, Yu H, Wang E, Zhang X, Zhang B, Liang Z (2020) Selection and validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in Codonopsis pilosula based on transcriptome sequence data. Sci Rep 10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58328-5
Liu WG, Liu JX, Yao ML, Ma QF (2016) Salt tolerance of a wild ecotype of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides L.) in southern China. Bot Stud 57(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-016-0142-x
Lunz K, Stappen I (2021) Back to the roots-an overview of the chemical composition and bioactivity of selected root-essential oils. Molecules 26(11):3155. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113155
Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y (2008) RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res 18(9):1509–1517. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.079558.108
Mei Q, Huang J, Chen W, Tang J, Xu C, Yu Q, Li S (2017) Regulation of DNA replication-coupled histone gene expression. Oncotarget 8(55):95005. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21887
Pabuayon IM, Yamamoto N, Trinidad JL, Longkumer T, Raorane ML, Kohli A (2016) Reference genes for accurate gene expression analyses across different tissues, developmental stages and genotypes in rice for drought tolerance. Rice 9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0104-7
Patel RK, Jain M (2012) NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 7(2):e30619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030619
Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26(6):509–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47
Pombo MA, Zheng Y, Fei Z, Martin GB, Rosli HG (2017) Use of RNA-seq data to identify and validate RT-qPCR reference genes for studying the tomato-Pseudomonas pathosystem. Sci Rep 7:44905. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44905
Prado F, Jimeno-Gonzalez S, Reyes JC (2017) Histone availability as a strategy to control gene expression. RNA Biol 14(3):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2016.1189071
Radonic A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A (2004) Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313(4):856–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.177
Reddy DS, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Cindhuri KS, Sharma KK (2013) Evaluation and validation of reference genes for normalization of quantitative real-time PCR based gene expression studies in peanut. PLoS ONE 8(10):e78555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078555
Ren J, Zhang N, Li X, Sun X, Song J (2021) Identification of reference genes for gene expression studies among different developmental stages of murine hearts. BMC Dev Biol 21(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-021-00244-6
Santos FICD, Marini N, Santos RSD, Hoffman BSF et al (2018) Selection and testing of reference genes for accurate RT-qPCR in rice seedlings under iron toxicity. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0193418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193418
Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3(6):1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.73
Silver N, Best S, Jiang J, Thein SL (2006) Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol 7:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-33
Sprang SR (2016) Invited review: activation of G proteins by GTP and the mechanism of Gα-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis. Biopolymers 105(8):449–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22836
Tarca AL, Romero R, Draghici S (2006) Analysis of microarray experiments of gene expression profiling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(2):373–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.001
Tranbarger TJ, Dussert S, Joet T, Argout X, Summo M, Champion A, Cros D, Omore A, Nouy B, Morcillo F (2011) Regulatory mechanisms underlying oil palm fruit mesocarp maturation, ripening, and functional specialization in lipid and carotenoid metabolism. Plant Physiol 156(2):564–584. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175141
Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3(7):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034
Vimala Y, Lavania UC, Banerjee R et al (2022) Vetiver grass environmental model for rehabilitation of iron overburden soil: an ecosystem service approach. Nat Acad Sci Lett 45(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-021-01087-2
Wang J, Abbas M, Wen Y, Niu D, Wang L, Sun Y, Li Y (2018) Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative gene expression analyses in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) using real-time quantitative PCR. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0193076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193076
Wang M, Bhullar NK (2021) Selection of suitable reference genes for QRT-PCR gene expression studies in rice. Rice Genome Eng Gene Edit Methods Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1068-8_20
Xia W, Mason AS, Xiao Y, Liu Z, Yang Y, Lei X, Wu X, Ma Z, Peng M (2014) Analysis of multiple transcriptomes of the African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) to identify reference genes for RT-qPCR. J Biotechnol 184:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.05.008
Xie H, Li B, Chang Y, Hou X, Zhang Y, Guo S et al (2021) Selection and validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in Spinacia oleracea under abiotic stress. Biomed Res Int 2021:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4853632
Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B (2012) miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol Biol 80:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9885-2
Xie F, Wang J, Zhang B (2023) RefFinder: a web-based tool for comprehensively analyzing and identifying reference genes. Funct Integr Genom 23(2):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-023-01055-7
Xie M, Zhong Y, Lin L, Zhang G, Su W, Ni W et al (2020) Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in the scarab beetle Holotrichia oblita. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0240972. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240972
Yu J, Su Y, Sun J, Liu J, Li Z, Zhang B (2020) Selection of stable reference genes for gene expression analysis in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Mol Cell Probes 53:101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2020.101610
Yu Y, Zhang G, Chen Y, Bai Q, Gao C, Zeng L, Yan Z (2019) Selection of reference genes for qPCR analyses of gene expression in ramie leaves and roots across eleven abiotic/biotic treatments. Sci Rep 9(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56640-3
Zhang X, Gao B, Xia H (2014) Effect of cadmium on growth, photosynthesis, mineral nutrition and metal accumulation of bana grass and vetiver grass. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 106:102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.025
Zhao X, Yang H, Chen M, Song X, Yu C, Zhao Y, Wu Y (2018) Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR of Mycelia from Lentinula edodes under high-temperature stress. Biomed Res Int 2018:1670328. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1670328
Zhuang H, Fu Y, He W, Wang L, Wei Y (2015) Selection of appropriate reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Oxytropisochrocephala Bunge using transcriptome datasets under abiotic stress treatments. Front Plant Sci 6:475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00475
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the logistic support received from Dr. A. K. Shasany, Director CSIR – National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow India, and AcSIR for Ph. D. degree registration. DC is grateful for funding from project OLP-110. R. D. Tripathi is grateful to NASI Prayagraj for the award of the NASI-Senior Scientist Platinum Jubilee Fellowship (GAP-3495). UCL is supported by the INSA Senior Scientist scheme. Y. Indoliya is grateful to CSIR, New Delhi for the award of RAship. This work is a part of the AcSIR Ph.D. program of ASC. CSIR-NBRI allotted the manuscript number CSIR-NBRI_MS/2023/04/16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DC, RDT, PSC, UCL and ASC designed and drafted the work. ASC carried out the bioinformatics analysis. MT and YI performed quantitative expression analysis (qRT-PCR). RDT, SKM, DC and PSC participated in the supervision of the study. YI helped in the writing of the manuscript. UCL facilitated to arrange the live material of the two contrasting Vetiver morphotypes used in this study. SKM corporated in the functional execution of the experiments. RDT and DC helped in the editing of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chauhan, A.S., Tiwari, M., Indoliya, Y. et al. Identification and validation of reference genes in vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides) root transcriptome. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 29, 613–627 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-023-01315-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-023-01315-7