Abstract
Water deficit triggers physiological, biochemical, and molecular changes in leaves that could be important for overall plant adaptive response and it can affect tomato yield and quality. To assess the influence of long-term moderate drought on leaves, four tomato accessions from MAGIC TOM populations were selected on the basis of their differences in fruit size and were grown in a glasshouse under control and water deficit conditions. Drought affected stomatal conductance more in large fruit genotypes compared to cherry genotypes and this could be related to higher abscisic acid (ABA) leaf content. Compared to large fruits, cherry tomato genotypes coped better with water stress by reducing leaf area and maintaining photochemical efficiency as important adaptive responses. Accumulation of soluble sugars in the cherry genotypes and organic acid in the leaves of the larger fruit genotypes indicated their role in the osmoregulation and the continuum of source/sink gradient under stress conditions. Long-term moderate drought induced upregulation of NCED gene in all four genotypes that was associated with ABA production. The increase in the expression of ZEP gene was found only in the LA1420 cherry genotype and indicated its possible role in the protection against photooxidative stress induced by prolonged water stress. In addition, upregulation of the APX genes, higher accumulation of vitamin C and total antioxidant capacity in cherry genotype leaves highlighted their greater adaptive response against long-term drought stress compared to larger fruit genotypes that could also reflect at fruit level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akram NA, Shafiq F, Ashraf M (2017) Ascorbic acid-A potential oxidant scavenger and its role in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci 8:613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00613
Albacete AA, Martínez-Andújar C, Pérez-Alfocea F (2014) Hormonal and metabolic regulation of source-sink relations under salinity and drought: from plant survival to crop yield stability. Biotechnol Adv 32(1):12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.005
Asch F (2000) Determination of abscisic acid by indirect enzyme linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA); Technical report. Taastrup, Denmark, Laboratory for Agrohydrology and Bioclimatology, Department of Agricultural Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.
Bastías A, Yañez M, Osorio S, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A, Fernie AR, Casaretto JA (2014) The transcription factor AREB1 regulates primary metabolic pathways in tomato fruits. J Exp Bot 65(9):2351–2363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru114
Beckles DM, Hong N, Stamova L, Luengwilai K (2012) Biochemical factors contributing to tomato fruit sugar content: a review. Fruits 67(1):49–64. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2011066
Calcagno AM, Rivas M, Castrillo M (2011) Structural, physiological and metabolic integrated responses of two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars during leaf rehydration. Aust J Crop Sci 5(6):695–701
Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Marc C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res 105:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004
Caverzan A, Passaia G, Rosa SB, Ribeiro CW, Lazzarotto F, Margis-Pinheiro M (2012) Plant responses to stresses, role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. Genetics Mol Biol 35(4):1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572012000600016
Çelik Ö, Ayan A, Atak Ç (2017) Enzymatic and non-enzymatic comparison of two different industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) varieties against drought stress. Bot Stud 58:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0186-6
Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2009) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress, regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103:551–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn125
Conti V, Mareri L, Faleri C, Nepi M, Romi M, Cai G, Cantini C (2019) Drought Stress Affects the Response of Italian Local Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) varieties in a Genotype-Dependent Manner. Plants 8(9):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090336
Fanciullino AL, Bidel LPR, Urban L (2014) Carotenoid responses to environmental stimuli: integrating redox and carbon controls into a fruit model. Plant Cell Environ 37:273–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12153
Fang Y, Xiong L (2015) General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 72:673–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0
Garchery C, Gest N, Do PT, Alhagdow M, Baldet P, Menard G, Rothan C, Massot C, Gautier H, Aarrouf J, Fernie AR, Stevens R (2013) A diminution in ascorbate oxidase activity affects carbonal location and improves yield in tomato under water deficit. Plant Cell Environ 36:159–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02564.x
Giorio P, Guida G, Mistretta C, Sellami MH, Oliva M, Punzo P, Iovieno P, Arena C, De Maio A, Grillo S, Albrizio R (2018) Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses to water stress and rehydration in Mediterranean adapted tomato landraces. Plant Biol 20(6):995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12891
Gomez L, Rubio E, Auge M (2002) A new procedure for extraction and measurement of soluble sugars in ligneous plant. J Sci Food Agric 82:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1046
Huang HJ, Zhang Q, Feng JH, Peng CL (2010) Does lutein play a key role in protection of photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis under severe oxidative stress? Pak J Bot 42(4):2765–2774
Iovieno P, Punzo P, Guida G, Mistretta C, Van Oosten JM, Nurcato R, Bostan H, Colantuono C, Costa A, Bagnaresi P, Chiusano ML, Albrizio R, Giorio P, Batelli G, Grillo S (2016) Transcriptomic changes drive physiological responsesto progressive drought stress and rehydration in tomato. Front Plant Sci 31:7e371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00371
Iqbal MS, Singh AK, Ansari MI (2020) Effect of Drought Stress on Crop Production. In: Rakshit A, Singh H, Singh A, Singh U, Fraceto L (eds) New Frontiers in Stress Management for Durable Agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 35–47
Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Taji T, Naramoto M, Seki M, Kato T, Tabata S, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2001) Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 27:325–333. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x
Landi S, De Lillo A, Nurcato R, Grillo S, Esposito S (2017) In-field study on traditional Italian tomato landraces, The constitutive activation of the ROS scavenging machinery reduces effects of drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 118:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.06.011
Lemoine R, Camera SL, Atanassova R, Dédaldéchamp F, Allario T, Pourtau N, Bonnemain JL, Laloi M, Coutos-Thevenot P, Maurousset L, Faucher M, Girousse C, Lemonnier P, Parilla J, Durand M (2013) Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci 4:272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00272
Li Y, Lu Y, Li L, Chu Z, Zhang H, Li H, Fernie AR, Ouyang B (2018) Impairment of hormone pathways results in a general disturbance of fruit primary metabolism in tomato. Food Chem 274:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.026
Lou Y, Sun H, Li L, Zhao H, Gao Z (2017) Characterization and Primary Functional Analysis of a Bamboo ZEP Gene from Phyllostachys edulis. DNA Cell Biol 36(9):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2017.3705
Manzi M, Lado J, Rodrigo MJ, Zacarías L, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A (2015) Root ABA accumulation in long-termwater-stressed plants is sustained byhormone transport from aerial organs. Plant Cell Physiol 56(12):2457–2466. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv161
Miller G, Suziki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen specieshomeostasis and signaling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33:453e467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
Mishra KB, Iannacone R, Petrozza A, Mishra A, Armetano N, La Vecchia G, Trtilek M, Cellini F, Nedbal L (2012) Engineered drought tolerance in tomato plants is reflected in chlorophyll fluorescence emission. Plant Sci 182:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.022
Moles TM, Mariotti L, De Pedro LF, Guglielminetti L, Picciarelli P, Scartazza A (2018) Drought induced changes of leaf-to-root relationships in two tomato genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem 128:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.05.008
Murshed R, Lopez-Lauri F, Sallanon H (2013) Effect of water stress on antioxidant systems and oxidative parameters in fruits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L, cv. Micro-tom). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 19(3):363–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0173-7
Nankishore A, Farrell AD (2016) The response of contrasting tomato genotypes to combined heat and drought stress. J Plant Physiol 202:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2016.07.006
Ntagkas N, Woltering EJ, Marcelis LFM (2018) Light regulates ascorbate in plants: an integrated view on physiology and biochemistry. Environ Exp Bot 147:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.009
Osorio S, Ruan YL, Fernie R (2014) An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato. Front Plant Sci 5:516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00516
Paciolla C, Fortunato S, Dipierro N, Paradiso A, De Leonardis S, Mastropasqua L, de Pinto MC (2019) Vitamin C in plants: from functions to biofortification. Antioxidants 8(11):519. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8110519
Pandey S, Fartyal D, Agarwal A, Shukla T, James D, Kaul T, Negi YK, Arora S, Reddy MK (2017) Abiotic stress tolerance in plants, myriad roles of ascorbate peroxidase. Front Plant Sci 8:581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00581
Park HY, Seok HY, Park BK, Kim SH, Goh CH, Lee BH (2008) Overexpression of Arabidopsis ZEP enhances tolerance to osmotic stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 375:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.128
Petrović I, Savić S, Jovanović Z, Stikić R, Brunel B, Serino S, Bertin N (2019) Fruit quality under water deficit - differences between cherry and large fruited tomato genotypes. Zemdirbyste 106(2):123–128. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2019.106.016
Ranc N (2010)Analyse du PolymorphismeMoléculaire de Gènes de Composantes de la Qualité des Fruits dans les RessourcesGénétiquesSauvages et Cultivées de Tomate; Recherche D’AssociationsGènes/QTL. PhD thesis, Académie de Montpellier, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier, Montpellier.
Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biol Med 26:1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
Rigano MM, Arena C, Di Matteo A, Sellitto S, Frusciante L, Barone A (2016) Eco- physiological response to water stress of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive tomato genotypes. Plant Biosyst 150(4):682–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.989286
Ripoll J, Urban L, Bertin N (2016a) The potential of the MAGIC TOM parental accessions to explore the genetic variability of tomato acclimation to repeated cycles of water deficit and recovery. Front Plant Sci 6:3–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01172
Ripoll J, Urban L, Brunel B, Bertin N (2016b) Water deficit effects on tomato quality depend on fruit development stage and genotype. J Plant Physiol 190:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2015.10.006
Rosales MA, Cervilla LM, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi MM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Soriano T, Castilla N, Romero L, Ruiz JM (2011) The effect of environmental conditions on nutritional quality of cherry tomato fruits, evaluation of two experimental Mediterranean greenhouses. J Sci Food Agric 91:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4166
Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi M, Cervilla LM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Rosales MA, Romero L, Ruiz JM (2010) Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci 178:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.10.001
Scholander PF, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA, Hammel HT (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants, negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science 148:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339
Schwarz N, Armbruster U, Iven T, Brückle L, Melzer M, Feussner I, Jahns P (2014) Tissue-specific accumulation and regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase in Arabidopsis reflect the multiple functions of the enzyme in plastids. Plant Cell Physiol 56(2):346–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu167
Sivakumar R, Nandhitha GK, Nithila S (2017) Impact of drought on chlorophyll, soluble protein, abscisic acid, yield and quality characters of contrasting genotypes of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). British Journal of Applied Science and Technology 21(5):1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2017/34347
Smirnof N (2018) Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: A comparison of plants and mammals. Free Radic Biol Med 122:116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.03.033
Sofo A, Scopa A, Nuzzaci M, Vitti A (2015) Ascobate peroxidase and catalase activities and their genetic regulation in plants subjected to drought and salinity stresses. Int J Mol Sci 16(6):13561–13578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613561
Stevens R, Buret M, Garchery C, Carretero Y, Causse M (2006) Technique for rapid, small-scale analysis of vitamin C levels in fruit and application to a tomato mutant collection. J Agric Food Chem 54:6159–6165. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061241e
Thompson AJ, Andrews J, Mulholland BJ, McKee JMT, Hilton HW, Horridge JS, Farquhar GD, Smeeton RC, Smillie IRA, Black CR, Taylor IB (2007) Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant Physiol 143(4):1905–1917. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.093559
Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, Kumar V, Verma R, Upadhyay RG, Pandey M, Sharma S (2017) Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants, a review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front Plant Sci 8:161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00161
Xiong L, Zhu JK (2003) Regulation of Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 133:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.025395
Yan F, Li X, Liu F (2017) ABA signaling and stomatal control in tomato plants exposure to progressive soil drying under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. EnvironExp Bot 139:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.04.008
Yuan XK, Yang ZQ, LiYX LQ, Han W (2016) Effects of different levels of water stress on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activities of greenhouse tomato. Photosynthetica 54(1):28–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0122-5
Zgallaï H, Steppe K, Lemeur R (2006) Effects of different levels of water stress on leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, protein and chlorophyll content and certain antioxidative enzymes in tomato plants. J Integr Plant Biol 48(6):679–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00272.x
Zhou R, Yu X, Ottosen CO, Rosenqvist E, Zhao L, Wang Y, Yu W, Zhao T, Wu Z (2017) Drought stress had a predominant effect over heat stress on three tomato cultivars subjected to combined stress. BMC Plant Biol 17(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0974-x
Zhou R, Kong L, Yu X, Ottosen CO, Zhao T, Jiang F, Wu Z (2019) Oxidative damage and antioxidant mechanism in tomatoes responding to drought and heat stress. Acta Physiol Plant 41:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2805-1
Funding
This study was supported by the EU Commission (FP7 project AREA) and the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 451-03-68/2021-14/200116 and Grant No. 451-03-9/2021-14/200216).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ivana Petrović: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft; Justine Gricourt, Slađana Savić: Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Zorica Jovanović, Radmila Stikić: Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision; Radmila Stikić, Mathilde Causse: Review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
No ethical issues were violated in this study.
Consent to participate
All authors agree to participate.
Consent for publication
All authors agree on publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrović, I., Savić, S., Gricourt, J. et al. Effect of long-term drought on tomato leaves: the impact on metabolic and antioxidative response. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 27, 2805–2817 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-01102-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-01102-2