Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introgression of productivity enhancing traits, resistance to pod borer and Phytopthora stem blight from Cajanus scarabaeoides to cultivated pigeonpea

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study aimed at introgression of productivity enhancing traits and resistance to pod borer and Phytophthora stem blight from wild to cultivated pigeonpea through an inter-specific cross between Cajanus scarabaeoides (ICP 15683) and C. cajan (ICPL 20329). Progenies derived from the direct segregating (without backcross) population and backcross population were evaluated for yield and yield contributing traits namely fruiting branches and pods plant−1 and 100-seed weight. Introgressed progenies having higher fruiting branches, pods and yield plant−1 compared to the cultivated parent were identified in both populations. A few progenies with significantly shorter plant height, early flowering and early maturity as compared to both cultivated and wild parents were also recovered in both populations. Progenies from both the populations were identified with higher resistance to pod borer and Phytophthora stem blight. However, some introgressed progenies having lower seed weight and seeds per pod were also recovered. The promising progenies are currently being used in the breeding programme to develop cultivars with improved productivity and resistance to pod borer and Phytophthora stem blight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2018a) Annual report 2018–19. All India Coordinated Research Project on Pigeonpea. ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, pp. 647

  • Anonymous (2018b) Project coordinator’s report. ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, pp 1–47

  • Bal CP, Bhave SG, Thaware BL, Desai SS, Mahadik SG, Krishnaja RN (2017) Variability studies in early genotypes of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Glob J Biol Sci Biotechnol 6:520–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement SL, McPhee KE, Elberson LR, Evans MA (2009) Pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), resistance in Pisum sativum × Pisum fulvum interspecific crosses. Plant Breed 128:478–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey KJ, Cox TS, Rodgers DM, Bramel-Cox P (1983) Increasing cereal yields with genes from wild and weedy species. In: Proceedings of the 15th international genetics congress. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, pp 51–68

  • Fulton TM, Grandillo S, Bunn BT, Fridman E, Framton A, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (2000) Advanced backcross QTL analysis of Lycopersicon esculantum × L. parviflorum cross. Theor Appl Genet 100:1025–1042

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill AS, Verma MM, Dhaliwal HS, Sandhu TS (1983) Interspecific transfer of resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic virus from Vigna mungo to Vigna radiata. Curr Sci 52:31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Singh IS, Reddy MV, Bajpai GC (1996) Nature of resistance to phytophthora blight in pigeonpea-breeding implications. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 3:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR (1984) Evaluation of wild relatives of crop plants. In: Holden JHW, Williams JT (eds) Crop genetic resources conservation evaluation. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 212–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji SD, Yuan PR, Xiao L, Lee HS, Ahn SN (2012) Characterization of quantitative trait loci for number of primary branches in near-isogenic lines from a cross between the Oryza sativa cultivar ‘Hwayeongbyeo’ and the wild relative Oryza rufipogon. Plant Breed 131:48–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury CK, Castañeda-Alvarez NP, Achicanoy HA, Sosa CC, Bernau V, Kassa MT, Norton SL, van der Maesen LJG, Upadhyaya HD, Ramírez-Villegas J, Jarvis A, Struik PC (2015) Crop wild relatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]: distributions, ex situ conservation status, and potential genetic resources for abiotic stress tolerance. Biol Conserv 184:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Gupta S, Chandra S, Singh BB (2003) How wide is the genetic base of pulse crops. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, pp 211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SJ, Oh CS, Suh JP, McCouch SR, Ahn SN (2005) Identification of QTLs for domestication-related and agronomic traits in an Oryza sativa × O. rufipogon BC1F7 population. Plant Breed 124:209–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalle RM, Taggar GK (2018) Yield loss assessment and establishment of economic threshold level of Maruca vitrata in pigeonpea. J Food Legume 31:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna N, Saxena KB (2005) A new cytoplasmic nuclear male-sterility system derived from cultivated pigeonpea cytoplasm. Euphytica 142:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna N, Saxena KB, Jadhav DR (2011) Cajanus. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources, legume crops and forages. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Naz AA, Ehl A, Pillen K, Leon J (2012) Validation for root-related quantitative trait locus effects of wild origin in the cultivated background of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Breed 131:392–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Nene YL, Kannaiyan J, Reddy MV (1981) Pigeonpea disease resistance screening techniques. Inf Bull 9:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal SS, Dhaliwal HS, Bains SS (1991) Inheritance of resistance to yellow mosaic virus in some Vigna species. Plant Breed 106:168–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande S, Pathak M, Sharma M, Narayana Rao J, Tomar OS (2006a) Resistance to phytophthora blight in the improved pigeonpea lines at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 13:42–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande S, Pathak M, Sharma M, Narayana Rao J, Anil Kumar P, Madhusudan Reddy D, Benagi Mahalinga D, Zhote DD, Karanjkar PN, Eksinghe BS (2006b) Outbreak of phytophthora blight of pigeonpea in the Deccan Plateau of India. J SAT Agric Res 2:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey P, Kumar K, Pandey VR, Tripathi M (2013) Genetic divergence studies in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Am J Plant Sci 4:2126–2130

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott-Allen R, Prescott-Allen C (1986) The first resource: wild species in the North American economy. Yale University, New Haven, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundir RPS, Singh RB (1986) Inheritance pattern for pod length and ovule number in wide crosses among Cajanus and Atylosia species. Euphytica 35:649–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Khanna V (2009) Introgression of yield and component traits through wide hybridization in pigeonpea. Crop Improv 36:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroj SK, Singh RS, Singh MN, Pathak N (2015) Studies on genetic variability of parents, F1’s and F2’s populations in pigeonpea. Agric Sustain Dev 3:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarsamkar SS, Borgaonkar SB, Kalyankar SV, Kadam BP, Kadam GR (2008) Genetic variability studies in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Int J Plant Sci 3:502–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena KB, Kumar RV (2003) Development of a cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterility system in pigeonpea using [C. scarabaeoides (L.) Thours]. Indian J Genet 63:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Franzmann BA (2000) Biology of the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) and its damage to pigeonpea and adzuki bean. Insect Sci Appl 20:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma D, Kannaiyan J, Reddy LJ (1982) Inheritance of resistance to blight in pigeonpea. Plant Dis 66:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma YR, Singh H, Singh G, Sidhu PS (1995) Screening of pigeonpea germplasm for resistance to Phytophthora stem blight. Plant Dis Res 10:102–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Sujana G, Rao DM (2009) Morphological and chemical components of resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in wild relatives of pigeonpea. Arthropod Plant Interact 3:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu PS, Verma MM, Sra SS (1984) Identification and utilization of new genetic resources for pigeonpea improvement. In: National seminar on new dimensions in pulses research and development. JNKVV Jabalpur, India, p 35

  • Singh J, Bajpai GC (2005) Analysis of gene effects for yield and yield attributing traits in interspecific crosses of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Indian J Genet 65:133–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Ocampo B (1997) Exploitation of wild Cicer species for yield improvement in chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 95:418–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VB, Pandey BP, Rathi YPS (1985) Field screening of pigeonpea lines for resistance to Phytophthora blight at Pantnagar, India. Pigeonpea Newsl 4:34–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Gumber RK, Joshi N, Singh K (2005) Introgression from wild Cicer reticulatum to cultivated chickpea for productivity and disease resistance. Plant Breed 124:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Singh S (2013) Introgression of productivity and other desirable traits from ricebean (Vigna umbellata) into black gram (Vigna mungo). Plant Breed 132:401–406

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Singh I, Singh S, Gupta M, Sharma P (2018) Evaluation of BC1F2 and F3 populations derived through wide hybridization for yield and component traits in pigeonpea. Agric Res J 55:633–638

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stalker HT (1980) Utilization of wild species for crop improvement. Adv Agron 33:111–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunitha V (2006) Varietal screening and insecticidal evaluation against Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in pigeonpea. Unpublished M.Sc thesis. College of Agriculture, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar. Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

  • Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1996) Advanced back cross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92:191–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T (1996) Advanced back cross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinnellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:213–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Techale B, Zeleke H, Ayana A, Tilahun A, Chemeda A (2013) Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in early maturing pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] genotypes. World J Agric Sci 1:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanki HP, Sawargaonkar SL (2010) Path coefficient analysis in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Electron J Plant Breed 1:936–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Pundir RPS, Singh S, Gowda CLL, Ahmad MI (2013a) Diversity and geographical gaps in Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thou. germplasm conserved at the ICRISAT gene bank. Plant Genet Resour 11:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Singh S, Gowda CLL (2013b) Phenotypic diversity in Cajanus species and identification of promising sources for agronomic traits and seed protein content. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:639–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verma MM, Brar JS (1996) Breeding approaches for increasing yield potential of mungbean. In: Asthana AN, Kim DH (eds) Recent advances in Mungbean research. IIPR, Kanpur, pp 102–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma MM, Sandhu JS, Brar HS, Brar JS (1990) Crossability studies in different Cicer species. Crop Improv 17:179–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma MM, Sandhu SS, Brar JS, Singh G (1991) Mungbean breeding for tolerance to biotic stress. In: Sharma B (ed) Proceedings of the Golden Jubilee celebrations symposium on Grain Legumes. New Delhi, India, pp 127–147

  • Wang XF, Wang YX, Zang GY, Ma ZY (2011) An integrated breeding technology for accelerating generation advancement and trait introgression in cotton. Plant Breed 130:569–573

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wubneh WY (2015) Interaction of pigeonpea genotypes with Maruca vitrata (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Unpublished M.Sc thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India

  • Wubneh WY, Taggar GK (2016a) Evaluation of pigeonpea genotypes for resistance to spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata Geyer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) under net-house and field conditions. J Insect Sci 29:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubneh WY, Taggar GK (2016b) Role of morphological factors of pigeonpea in imparting resistance to spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata Geyer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J Appl Nat Sci 8:218–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Grandillo S, Ahn SN, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD, Li J, Yuan L (1996) Genes from wild rice for improvement in yield. Nature 384:223–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav LB, Kushwaha KPS, Maurya RP (2016) Screening of germplasm of pigeonpea against phytophthora stem blight. Int J Plant Prot 9:120–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Pang W, Ash G, Harps J, Caring J, Wenze P, Hutter E, Zong X, Killian A (2006) Low level of genetic diversity in cultivated pigeonpea compared to its wild relatives as revealed by diversity array technology. Theor Appl Genet 113:585–595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yerimani AS, Subhash M, Kharde MN (2013) Genetic variability for yield and yield component traits in advanced F3 and F4 generations of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan(L.) Millsp.]. Mol Plant Breed 4:136–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India

    Gurjeet Singh, Inderjit Singh, Gaurav Kumar Taggar, Upasana Rani, Pankaj Sharma, Mamta Gupta & Sarvjeet Singh

Authors
  1. Gurjeet Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inderjit Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gaurav Kumar Taggar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Upasana Rani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pankaj Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mamta Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sarvjeet Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GS, GKT, UR and MG conducted the experiments and performed the phenotyping. SS, IS and GKT designed the experiments. PS and IS performed the data analysis. GS, PS and GKT prepared the final manuscript. SS, IS and GKT conceived the experiment and edit the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarvjeet Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, G., Singh, I., Taggar, G.K. et al. Introgression of productivity enhancing traits, resistance to pod borer and Phytopthora stem blight from Cajanus scarabaeoides to cultivated pigeonpea. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26, 1399–1410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00827-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00827-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation