Skip to main content
Log in

Discordant Hemoglobin Values Determined by Blood Gas Analyzer and Hematology Analyzer Synchronously Is a Warning for Inappropriate Blood Sampling

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A patient may have two contemporary hemoglobin test results; one received from a hematology analyzer and the other from a blood gas analyzer. Such results may pose a dilemma if validated without investigation. A 27-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department because of worsening dyspnea and hemoptysis. Her hemogram revealed Hb 4.5 g/dL; Hct 16.1% while blood gas analysis showed Hb 8.1 g/dL; Hct 25.3%. The results were evaluated to be suspicious. All results were rejected and new requests were made. Hb 9.8 g/dL; Hct 31.9% were seen in repeated hemogram while blood gas analysis showed Hb 10.2 g/dL; Hct 31.5%. It was understood that the nurse used the vein with an intravenous fluid for sampling the first hemogram. A multitude of factors affect the accuracy of hemoglobin concentration measurements. Literature suggests that hemoglobin values of hematology analyzers and blood gas analyzers should be in harmony. Any discordance must be an alarm to stop and review the test results before validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Whitehead RD Jr, Mei Z, Mapango C, Jefferds MED. Methods and analyzers for hemoglobin measurement in clinical laboratories and field settings. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1450:147–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berkow L. Factors affecting hemoglobin measurement. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray JG, Post JR, Hamielec C. Use of a rapid arterial blood gas analyzer to estimate blood hemoglobin concentration among critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2002;6:72–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang JB, Lin J, Zhao XD. Analysis of bias in measurements of potassium, sodium and hemoglobin by an emergency department-based blood gas analyzer relative to hospital laboratory autoanalyzer results. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dolscheid-Pommerich RC, Dolscheid S, Grigutsch D, Stoffel-Wagner B, Graeff I. Comparability of point-of-comparability of point-of-care versus central laboratory hemoglobin determination in emergency patients at a supra-maximal care hospital. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Aydın.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The Author states that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethical Approval

For the case report study the approval by the ethical committee is not required in our hospital.

Informed Consent

This case report involves information about a human.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydın, Ö. Discordant Hemoglobin Values Determined by Blood Gas Analyzer and Hematology Analyzer Synchronously Is a Warning for Inappropriate Blood Sampling. Ind J Clin Biochem 37, 250–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-020-00938-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-020-00938-x

Keywords

Navigation