Abstract
The article analyses the regional approach in the Eastern Partnership (EaP). It is argued that the EaP is a political region-building project, which has entailed the construction of the EaP region as a political and economic periphery based on a process of assimilating the EaP countries to EU norms and standards. The assimilation project has, however, failed to yield significant success. The article explores the potential (and perhaps by now the missed opportunity) to adopt a more emancipatory approach to the region, including the strengthening of political and economic cooperation and infrastructure links between the EaP countries to reduce their dependence on Russia. But the outlook is bleak: after a decade of the EU’s and Russia’s region-building projects competing (with neither power being particularly successful in the attempt to assimilate ‘its region’), the region and its states are likely to be fragmented into a multiplicity of territories which are set to develop into de facto dependencies of either Russia or the EU/the West.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Author’s interview with a senior government official from an EaP country, March 2014.
Some projects (albeit few) also include the Russian Federation as a project partner. These are mainly projects in the area of the environment, in which Russia participates through the Tempus programme.
Author’s interview with civil society representatives, March 2014.
References
Council of the European Union. (2009). Joint declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit. 8435/09 (Presse 78), 7 May. http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/neighbourhood/eastern_partnership/documents/prague_summit_declaration_en.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2014.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Development and Cooperation. (2013). Regional cooperation in the EU neighbourhood. Brussels, 2 May.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade. (2014). European Union, trade in goods with Ukraine. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113459.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2014.
Eurostat. (2014). International trade. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/newxtweb. Accessed 21 April 2014.
Foucher, M. (1998). The geopolitics of European frontiers. In M. Anderson & E. Bort (eds.), The frontiers of Europe (pp. 235–50). London and Washington, DC: Pinter.
Kaca, E., Kucharczyk, J., & Łada, A. (2011). Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum & how to improve it. Warsaw: The Institute of Public Affairs.
Neumann, I. B. (1999). Uses of the other: ‘The East’ in European identity formation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
The Economist. (2012). Democracy index 2012: Democracy is at a standstill. London. http://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex12. Accessed 21 April 2014.
The Heritage Foundation. (2013). Economic freedom index. http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking. Accessed 8 May 2014.
United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Human development report. New York: United Nations.
Walters, W. (2004). The frontiers of the European Union: A geostrategic perspective. Geopolitics, 9(3), 674–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Bosse, G. The Eastern Partnership and the disintegration of Eastern Europe: The end of the region-building project?. European View 13, 97–108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-014-0306-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-014-0306-6