Abstract
In March 2010, the Europe 2020 strategy was released as the follow-up to the very ambitious Lisbon Strategy. Like its predecessor, the strategy aims to increase Europe’s competitiveness in the world economy. Also like its predecessor, Europe 2020 is likely to be ineffectual. The strategy focuses too much on areas that are outside the EU’s legal competence, it lacks recourse for non-compliance and it contains goals that have very little to do with increasing competitiveness. The probable failure of Europe 2020 could have been avoided had the European Commission focused on policy areas over which the EU has competence, and had been given the tools to accomplish the goals that were outside its competence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eichengreen B (2007) The European economy since 1945: coordinated capitalism and beyond. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Erixon F (2005) Transatlantic and global dimensions of the Lisbon Agenda. In: Hamilton D, Quinlan J (eds) Deep integration: how transatlantic markets are leading globalization. CEPS and Center for Transatlantic Relations, Brussels, pp 250–273
Erixon F, Razeen S (2010) Trade, globalisation and emerging protectionism since the crisis. ECIPE, Brussels
Henderson D (1986) Innocence and design: the influence of economic ideas on policy. Blackwell, Oxford
Jones K (1995) Export restraint and the new protectionism. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Krugman P (1996) Pop internationalism. MIT Press, Cambridge
Siebert H (1991) The new economic landscape in Europe. Blackwell, London
Tumlir J (1984) Economic policy as a constitutional problem. Institute of Economic Affairs, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Erixon, F. The Europe 2020 strategy: time for Europe to think again. European View 9, 29–37 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-010-0120-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-010-0120-8