Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy evolution and path compensation in 3D laser cutting process for advanced high strength steel parts: numerical analysis and experimental investigation

  • Developments in Modelling and Simulation..japan, South Korea and China
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advanced high strength steel (AHSS) has been widely used in automobile components due to its good lightweight effect and high safety. 3D laser cutting is the most dominant method for removing material from AHSS. However, the springback in the whole manufacturing process severely causes 3D laser cutting path deviations. To improve the cutting accuracy, a novel 3D laser cutting path compensation method considering the springback transfer is proposed in this paper. The AHSS A-pillar is used to investigate the springback behavior in the whole process. The hot stamping finite element model and 3D laser cutting finite element model are established, respectively. Through the finite element simulation analysis, the accuracy evolution law of the part during the whole process is discussed. Based on the accuracy evolution law of the hot stamping and the accuracy evolution law of the laser cutting process, the proposed compensation method is employed to modify the laser cutting path. The modified path is then applied to a 3D laser cutting experiment. The experimental results show that the deviation value is reduced by about 15% compared with the conventional 3D laser cutting process. The proposed 3D laser cutting path compensation method shows the advantage of high accuracy, which can also effectively improve production efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig.6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Safari H, Nahvi H, Esfahanian M (2017) Improving automotive crashworthiness using advanced high strength steels. Int J Crashworthines 23(6):645–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2017.1389624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Z, Lu Q, Cao ZH, Chen H, Huang MX, Wang JF (2022) Review on Hydrogen Embrittlement of Press-hardened Steels for Automotive Applications. Acta Metall Sinica (English Letters). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-022-01408-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miraoui I, Boujelbene M, Zaied M (2016) High-Power Laser Cutting of Steel Plates: Heat Affected Zone Analysis. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Russo Spena P (2017) CO2 Laser Cutting of Hot Stamping Boron Steel Sheets. Metals-Basel. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7110456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gautam GD, Mishra DR (2019) Dimensional accuracy improvement by parametric optimization in pulsed Nd:YAG laser cutting of Kevlar-29/basalt fiber-reinforced hybrid composites. J Braz Soc Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1783-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shrivastava PK, Singh B, Shrivastava Y, Pandey AK (2019) Prediction of geometric quality characteristics during laser cutting of Inconel-718 sheet using statistical approach. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 41(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1727-6

  7. Nguyen V, Altarazi F, Tran T, Hu J (2022) Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Cutting Process of Stainless Steel 304: A Comparative Analysis and Estimation with Taguchi Method and Response Surface Methodology. Math Probl Eng 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6677586

  8. Madić M, Mladenović S, Gostimirović M, Radovanović M, Janković P (2020) Laser cutting optimization model with constraints: Maximization of material removal rate in CO2 laser cutting of mild steel. Proc IME B J Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420911529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shrivastava PK, Singh B, Shrivastava Y, Pandey AK, Nandan D (2019) Investigation of optimal process parameters for laser cutting of Inconel-718 sheet. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219895533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Girdu CC, Gheorghe C, Radulescu C, Cirtina D (2021) Influence of Process Parameters on Cutting Width in CO2 Laser Processing of Hardox 400 Steel. Applied Sciences 11(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135998

  11. Jadhav A, Kumar S (2019) Laser cutting of AISI 304 material: an experimental investigation on surface roughness. Adv Mater Process Technol 5(3):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068x.2019.1622297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buj-Corral I, Costa-Herrero L, Dominguez-Fernandez A (2021) Effect of Process Parameters on the Quality of Laser-Cut Stainless Steel Thin Plates. Metals-Basel 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081224

  13. Ninikas K, Kechagias J, Salonitis K (2021) The Impact of Process Parameters on Surface Roughness and Dimensional Accuracy during CO2 Laser Cutting of PMMA Thin Sheets. J Manuf Mater Process. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp5030074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazov L, Nikolić V, Jovic S, Milovančević M, Deneva H, Teirumenieka E, Arsic N (2018) Evaluation of laser cutting process with auxiliary gas pressure by soft computing approach. Infrared Phys Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2018.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nabavi SF, Farshidianfar MH, Farshidianfar A, Marandi S (2022) Dross formation modeling in the laser beam cutting process using energy-based and gas-based parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09019-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaki S, Bathe RN, Ghosal S, Padmanabham G (2018) Multi-objective optimisation of pulsed Nd:YAG laser cutting process using integrated ANN-NSGAII model. J Intell Manuf 29(1):175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1100-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rohman MN, Ho JR, Tung PC, Lin CT, Lin CK (2022) Prediction and optimization of dross formation in laser cutting of electrical steel sheet in different environments. J Market Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin JS, Oh SY, Park H, Chung CM, Seon S, Kim TS, Lee L, Choi B-S, Moon J-K (2017) High-speed fiber laser cutting of thick stainless steel for dismantling tasks. Opt Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.03.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oh SY, Shin JS, Kim TS, Park H, Lee L, Chung CM, Lee J (2019) Effect of nozzle types on the laser cutting performance for 60-mm-thick stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrigues GC, Levichev N, Vorkov V, Duflou JR (2019) Thickness validation of modeling tools for laser cutting applications. Procedia Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin JS, Oh SY, Park SK, Park H, Lee J (2021) Improved underwater laser cutting of thick steel plates through initial oblique cutting. Opt Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang HJ, Ren YX, Lian JW, Xu WL, Gao NH, Wang X-G, Jia C-S (2022) A new predicting model study on U-shaped stamping springback behavior subjected to steady-state temperature field. J Manuf Process 76:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.004

  23. Lajarin SF, Filho RAC, Rebeyka CJ, Nikhare CP, Marcondes PVP (2020) Numerical study on variation of chord modulus on the springback of high-strength steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(11–12):4707–4713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04975-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gautam V, Kumar DR (2018) Experimental and numerical investigations on springback in V-bending of tailor-welded blanks of interstitial free steel. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 232(12):2178–2191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416687146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Hu Q, Yan J, Chen J (2016) Springback prediction and compensation for the third generation of UHSS stamping based on a new kinematic hardening model and inertia relief approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1–4):875–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9439-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dang VT, Labergère C, Lafon P (2018) Adaptive metamodel-assisted shape optimization for springback in metal forming processes. Int J Mater Form 12(4):535–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1433-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin J, Hou Y, Min J, Tang H, Carsley JE, Stoughton TB (2019) Effect of constitutive model on springback prediction of MP980 and AA6022-T4. Int J Mater Form 13(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-01468-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li B, Melkote SN (2001) Fixture Clamping Force Optimisation and its Impact on Workpiece Location Accuracy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700170198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abedini V, Shakeri M, Siahmargouei MH, Baseri H (2014) Analysis of the influence of machining fixture layout on the workpiece’s dimensional accuracy using genetic algorithm. Proc IME B J Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413519605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang J, Chunzheng D, Jinxing K, Yi C, Yuwen S, Shanglin W (2020) Prediction of clamping deformation in vacuum fixture–workpiece system for low-rigidity thin-walled precision parts using finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05745-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dingqiang P, Liming W, Chris KM, Yimin S (2021) Position prediction and error compensation for a large thin-walled box-shaped workpiece in a fixture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07632-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang HL, Jywe WY, Cho MC (2015) Development of a simple laser-based 2D contouring accuracy compensation system for the laser cutting machine. Optik. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.08.244

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 52075400, 52275368); Independent Innovation Projects of the Hubei Longzhong Laboratory(2022ZZ-04); the 111 Project (grant number B17034), and the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province (grant number 2021BAA200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhili Hu or Qiu Pang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this work.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., Hu, Z., Pang, Q. et al. Accuracy evolution and path compensation in 3D laser cutting process for advanced high strength steel parts: numerical analysis and experimental investigation. Int J Mater Form 16, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01734-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01734-z

Keywords

Navigation