Skip to main content
Log in

A proposal improvement in flatness measurement in strip rolling

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In strip rolling flatness of the final product is controlled inline with a roll sensor placed at the outgoing of the tandem mill to measure the longitudinal (in the rolling direction) internal stress profile throughout the coil. This profile involves resultant force and sometimes resultant moment (due to preset anomaly for example) equilibrated by the coiler. When strip is relaxed these two quantities are eliminated and there remain residual stresses in the strip. Since negative residual stresses are the main origin of defects, operators subtract the resultant force from measurements to visualize the residual stress profile in real time and detect negative values, without considering the resultant moment. In this paper we show that to predict flatness defects correctly we have to subtract resultant moment too. Otherwise, unpredictable defects manifest in the delivered product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molleda J, Usamentiaga R, García D (2013) On-line flatness measurement in the steelmaking industry. Sensors 13(12):10245–10272. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelkhalek S, Zahrouni H, Legrand N, Potier-Ferry M (2015) Post-buckling modeling for strips under tension and residual stresses using asymptotic numerical method. Int J Mech Sci 104:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zahrouni H, Cochelin B, Potier-Ferry M (1999) Computing finite rotations of shells by an asymptotic-numerical method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 175(1-2):71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00320-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Büchter N, Ramm E, Roehl D (1994) Three-dimensional extension of non-linear shell formulation based on the enhanced assumed strain concept. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37(15):2551–2568. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620371504

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Boutyour EH, Zahrouni H, Potier-Ferry M, Boudi M (2004) Bifurcation points and bifurcated branches by an asymptotic numerical method and Padé approximants. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60(12):1987–2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1033

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanemori S, Kinose R, Maniwa S et al (2014) Development of strip shape meter with high accuracy under severe conditions of hot strip mill. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Tech Rev 51:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  7. Molleda J, Usamentiaga R, García DF, Bulnes FG (2010) Real-time flatness inspection of rolled products based on optical laser triangulation and three-dimensional surface reconstruction. J Electron Imaging 19(3):31206. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3455987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuzuki S, Yoichi K, Kenji M (2009) Flatness control system of cold rolling Processwith pneumatic bearing type shape roll. IHI Eng Rev 42:54–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author wish to thank Arcelormittal company for providing measurements and Pierre Montmitonnet for helpful and comments on the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Abdelkhalek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelkhalek, S. A proposal improvement in flatness measurement in strip rolling. Int J Mater Form 12, 89–96 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1409-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1409-4

Keywords

Navigation